Bank of New York v. Conte, A. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • J-S54037-15
    NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
    BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON AS                       IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    TRUSTEE FOR GE-WMC ASSET-BACKED                        PENNSYLVANIA
    PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATE SERIES
    2005-2 TRUST,
    v.
    ANTHONY JOHN CONTE, III, A/K/A
    ANTHONY JOHN CONTE AND UNITED
    STATES OF AMERICA EASTERN
    DISTRICT
    APPEAL OF: ANTHONY JOHN CONTE, III,
    A/K/A ANTHONY JOHN CONTE
    No. 666 EDA 2015
    Appeal from the Order January 29, 2015
    In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
    Civil Division at No(s): July Term, 2010, No. 532
    BEFORE: BOWES, PANELLA, AND FITZGERALD * JJ.
    DISSENTING STATEMENT BY BOWES, J.:               FILED NOVEMBER 30, 2015
    I respectfully disagree with the majority’s disposition of this matter as
    I conclude that the failure to adjudicate the rights of the federal government
    by entry of a judgment is not fatal to our jurisdiction.
    Appellee instituted this mortgage foreclosure action after Appellant
    defaulted on a mortgage that had been assigned to Appellee. Appellee was
    owed nearly $530,000 when this case was instituted. It filed the complaint
    solely to foreclose on the mortgaged property.       The complaint stated that
    the United States of America was a named defendant because it had filed a
    *
    Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
    J-S54037-15
    federal tax lien against Appellant, and it delineated the amount of the tax
    lien.   In my view, the failure to obtain a judgment against the federal
    government was unnecessary.        The federal tax lien and its amount were
    outlined in the complaint, and its order of payment will be determined when
    the proceeds of the sheriff’s sale are distributed.
    We have previously held that an order either denying or granting a
    petition to set aside a sheriff’s sale is a final, appealable order under
    Pa.R.A.P. 341 since it constitutes a final adjudication of all matters before
    the court. See Nat'l Penn Bank v. Shaffer, 
    672 A.2d 326
    , 328 n. 4 (Pa.
    Super. 1996) (ruling specifically that an order granting petition to set aside
    sheriff’s sale was final appealable order since order “completely disposed of
    all of the parties' claims[.]”); see also Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Lark,
    
    73 A.3d 1265
     (Pa. Super 2013) (accepting jurisdiction over an order denying
    a motion to set aside a sheriff’s sale).     Accordingly, I would address the
    merits of this appeal rather than quash.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 666 EDA 2015

Filed Date: 11/30/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/30/2015