Richard Vernon Quick v. State of Texas ( 2009 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed August 6, 2009
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    ___________
    No. 11-09-00096-CR
    __________
    RICHARD VERNON QUICK, Appellant
    V.
    STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 355th District Court
    Hood County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CR10964
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    The jury convicted Richard Vernon Quick of burglary of a building and assessed his
    punishment at confinement in a state jail facility for twenty-four months. We dismiss the appeal.
    Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported
    by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable
    law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided appellant
    with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of his right to review the record and file a response
    to counsel’s brief. A response has not been filed. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the
    requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967); In re Schulman, 
    252 S.W.3d 403
    (Tex.
    Crim. App. 2008); Stafford v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 
    516 S.W.2d 684
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
    Gainous v. State, 
    436 S.W.2d 137
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and Eaden v. State, 
    161 S.W.3d 173
    (Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.).
    Following the procedures outlined in Anders, we have independently reviewed the record,
    and we agree that the appeal is without merit. We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise
    appellant that he may file a petition for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
    Ex parte Owens, 
    206 S.W.3d 670
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Likewise, this court advises appellant
    that he may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX . R. APP . P. 66. Black v. State,
    
    217 S.W.3d 687
    (Tex. App.—Eastland 2007, no pet.).
    The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    August 6, 2009
    Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP . P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    McCall, J., and Strange, J.
    2