-
I concur in the judgment of reversal but not for the reason given in the majority opinion. The property was first rented at $17 per month; subsequently the rent was raised to $20 per month; and this rental covered the term from the first day to the last day of each calendar month. The lessee held over for several years. This constituted a tenancy from month to month, not a tenancy at will: Hollis v. Burns,
100 Pa. 206 ; Hood v. Drysdale,27 Pa. Super. 540 ; and the tenant was entitled to full 30 days' notice before the expiration of his monthly term, which in this case was not given; he was notified on August 15, 1922, to vacate on September 15, 1922.There was, however, no evidence in the case to justify a verdict of $500. The actual damages proven were trivial in amount and there was no evidence of wantonness or malicious conduct justifying punitive damages. On that ground I would reverse the judgment and award a new trial.
GAWTHROP, J., joins in this opinion. *Page 341
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 83 Pa. Super. 337
Judges: OPINION BY TREXLER, J., July 2, 1924:
Filed Date: 4/18/1924
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023