Stremler v. Lincoln ( 2014 )

 electronic means, if the party being served consents in writing"). Thus,
because notice of entry of the challenged order was served electronically
on December 4, 2013, the notice of appeal was required to be filed by
January 6, 2014. 1 See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). Because the notice of
appeal was not filed until January 14, 2014, it was untimely, and we
therefore lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Healy v.
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 331, 741 P.2d 432, 433
(1987) (recognizing that an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest
jurisdiction in this court).
Accordingly, we grant respondents' motion and
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Poeutuf
' J.
p
' kering
J.
Parraguirre
,
Saitta
'In their opposition to the motion to dismiss, appellants assert that
nonjudicial days are excluded from the calculation of the date that a
document is due. But nonjudicial days are only excluded if the period
being calculated is less than 11 days. See NRCP 6(a); NRAP 26(a)(2).
Thus, nonjudicial days are included in the calculation of when a notice of
appeal is due, except to the extent that the due date falls on a nonjudicial
day. See NRCP 6; NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(a)(3).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
cc: Hon. Richard Wagner, District Judge
Barbara Stremler
Michael Stremler
Parsons Behle & Latimer/Reno
Pershing County Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A ea