In Re Wieneke ( 2012 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE PAUL R. WIENEKE, SCOTT D. EIKENBERRY, TIM NUFIRE, DAVID A. KOBLAS, AND BRIAN K. WILSON (REAL PARTY IN INTEREST SONICWALL, INC.) ____________________ 2011-1250 (Serial No. 10/449,875) ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ COLBY B. SPRINGER, Lewis and Roca LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief was TAM THANH PHAM. JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 13, 2012 /s/Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk