United States v. Norfleet , 36 F. App'x 71 ( 2002 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-4828
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM FRANK NORFLEET,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CR-90-104)
Submitted: April 30, 2002 Decided: May 31, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
A. Christopher Zaleski, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY, P.L.C., Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney,
Laura M. Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William Frank Norfleet appeals the sentence imposed upon the
revocation of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. The
district court did not err in imposing a sentence above that
recommended by U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a), p.s.
(2000). 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 3583(e)(3), (g) (West 2000); see generally
United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638, 640-41 & nn. 1, 6, 10 (4th
Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Norfleet, No. CR-90-104 (E.D. Va. Oct.
16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2