O. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    Filed: August 31, 20171
    Refiled in Redacted Form: February 7, 2018
    * * * * * * * * * * *                     **          PUBLISHED
    S.O. and A.O., Parents and Natural         *
    Guardians of T.A.O., a Minor,              *          Chief Special Master Dorsey
    *
    *          No. 08-125V
    Petitioners,                 *
    *          Denial of Entitlement; Measles, Mumps
    v.                                        *          & Rubella (“MMR”) Vaccine; Hepatitis
    *          A (“Hep A”) Vaccine; Varicella
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                        *          Vaccine; Autistic Disorder (“AD”);
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                        *          Residual Human DNA Fragments;
    *          HERV-K Fragments; Insertional
    Respondent.                  *          Mutagenesis; Autoimmunity.
    * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    Robert J. Krakow, Law Office of Robert J. Krakow, P.C., New York, NY, for petitioners.
    Linda Sara Renzi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION DISMISSING PETITION
    On May 6, 2014, petitioners filed a status report in which they agreed to be bound by the
    ruling in the J.M et al. (02-10V) case.
    On August 31, 2017, I ruled against petitioners in J.M. et al. A copy of that decision is
    attached hereto as Appendix A and is incorporated herein.
    Accordingly, petitioners are bound by that decision, and this case is DISMISSED. In the
    absence of a motion for review,2 the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in
    accordance with this decision.
    1
    When this decision was originally filed, I advised the parties of my intent to post it on the
    United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of
    2002. 
    44 U.S.C. §3501
     note (2012) (Federal management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners filed a motion to
    redact certain information. This decision is being reissued with minimal changes, including
    redaction of the petitioners’ name in the case caption to initials and redaction of the lead omnibus
    case name to initials. Except for those changes and this footnote, no other substantive changes
    have been made.
    2
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
    notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    1
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-125

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 2/7/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/7/2018