State v. Orosco ( 2017 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. No. A-1-CA-36230 5 ANDREW J. OROSCO, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY 8 Angie K. Schneider, District Judge 9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellee 12 Todd A. Holmes 13 Alamogordo, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 GARCIA, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} AFFIRMED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 __________________________________ 7 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _______________________________ 10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 11 _______________________________ 12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2