In Re United States ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                FOR PUBLICATION                         FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                     NOV 18 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;               No.   17-72917
    DONALD J. TRUMP; U.S.
    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND                         D.C. Nos. 3:17-cv-05211-WHA
    SECURITY; ELAINE C. DUKE.                                3:17-cv-05235-WHA
    ______________________________                           3:17-cv-05329-WHA
    3:17-cv-05380-WHA
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;                                3:17-cv-05813-WHA
    DONALD J. TRUMP; U.S.                          Northern District of California,
    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND                         San Francisco
    SECURITY; ELAINE C. DUKE, in her
    official capacity as Acting Secretary of the   ORDER
    Department of Homeland Security,
    Petitioners,
    v.
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
    CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO,
    Respondent,
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
    CALIFORNIA; JANET NAPOLITANO,
    In her official capacity as President of the
    University of California; STATE OF
    CALIFORNIA; STATE OF MAINE;
    STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF
    MARYLAND; CITY OF SAN JOSE;
    DULCE GARCIA; MIRIAM GONZALEZ
    AVILA; VIRIDIANA CHABOLLA
    MENDOZA; NORMA RAMIREZ;
    COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA;
    SMR/MOATT
    SERVICE EMPLOYEES
    INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 521;
    JIRAYUT LATTHIVONGSKORN;
    SAUL JIMENEZ SUAREZ,
    Real Parties in Interest.
    Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
    The court has received the government’s November 17, 2017 emergency
    stay motion. The response to the motion is due Monday, November 20, 2017, at
    12:00 p.m. PST, and the optional reply is due Monday, November 20, 2017, at
    5:00 p.m. PST.
    In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in the response and
    reply, the parties shall address whether this court has jurisdiction to grant a stay of
    proceedings, or whether the motion for a stay should instead be filed in the district
    court. See Ellis v. U.S. Dist. Court, 
    360 F.3d 1022
     (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc).
    SMR/MOATT                                    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-72917

Filed Date: 11/18/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/20/2017