United States v. Decio Viveros Granja ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •         USCA11 Case: 20-11745    Date Filed: 05/20/2021   Page: 1 of 3
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 20-11745
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00316-VMC-CPT-3
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    DECIO VIVEROS GRANJA,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (May 20, 2021)
    Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    USCA11 Case: 20-11745        Date Filed: 05/20/2021     Page: 2 of 3
    Decio Viveros Granja appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to
    distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine while on board of a vessel subject to
    the jurisdiction of the United States, in violation of 
    46 U.S.C. §§ 70503
    (a),
    70506(a) and (b), and 
    21 U.S.C. § 960
    (b)(1)(B)(ii), and sentence of 121 months’
    imprisonment.
    Granja’s appointed counsel in this direct criminal appeal has moved to
    withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744, 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    , 1400 (1967) (when
    counsel determines that a criminal defendant’s case is “wholly frivolous,” counsel
    must “so advise the court and request permission to withdraw”). As required, his
    counsel filed a brief setting out any irregularities or other potential errors in
    Granja’s plea and sentencing processes that might arguably be meritorious. See
    United States v. Blackwell, 
    767 F.2d 1486
    , 1487–88 (11th Cir. 1985) (per curiam).
    His counsel notes the existence of a valid appeal waiver in the plea agreement and
    says the record does not reveal that any exception to that waiver applies. He also
    notes that Granja received a below-guidelines sentence. He concludes that he was
    unable to find the existence of any meritorious argument on appeal.
    Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
    assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
    examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
    2
    USCA11 Case: 20-11745    Date Filed: 05/20/2021   Page: 3 of 3
    motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Granja’s conviction and sentence are
    AFFIRMED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-11745

Filed Date: 5/20/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/20/2021