Adam Michael Finkle v. the State of Texas ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 10, 2021.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-21-00183-CR
    NO. 14-21-00184-CR
    ADAM MICHAEL FINKLE, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 10th District Court
    Galveston County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. 12-CR-0352 & 12-CR-0353
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    After the trial court found appellant qualified for deferred adjudication
    community supervision on charges of possession of less than 28 ounces of a
    controlled substance, hydrocodone, in a drug-free zone (trial court case number
    12-CR-0352; appellate case number 14-21-00183-CR) and possession of four
    ounces or less but more that two ounces of marijuana in a drug-free zone (trial
    court case number 12-CR-0353; appellate case number 14-21-00184-CR), the trial
    court deferred further proceedings and placed appellant on deferred adjudication
    community supervision. The State in each case moved to adjudicate appellant’s
    guilt based on violations of conditions of community supervision. The trial court in
    each case granted the motion, set aside the deferred adjudication, found appellant
    guilty, and assessed punishment at two years’ confinement in state jail, to run
    concurrently. The sentences were imposed in open court on June 15, 2020. No
    timely motions for new trial were filed. Therefore, appellant’s notices of appeal
    were due within 30 days after the day sentences was imposed, which was July 15,
    2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).
    A court of appeals may grant an extension of time if, within 15 days after the
    deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party files (a) the notice of appeal in the
    trial court, and (b) a motion to extend time in the court of appeals. See Tex. R.
    App. P. 26.3; see also Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(2) (governing motion to extend time
    to file notice of appeal). The fifteenth day after July 15, 2020, was July 30, 2020.
    Appellant filed his notices of appeal on February 27, 2021, a date that is not within
    15 days of the due date.
    A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of
    Appellate Procedure 26.2 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction.
    Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (construing former
    1986 Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(b)(1)). When a notice of appeal is not
    filed within the 15-day motion-to-extend-time period, the court of appeals can take
    no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See 
    id.
    (construing former 1986 Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(b)(2)).
    On April 20, 2021, the parties were notified that the appeals would be
    dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has
    jurisdiction. No response has been received.
    2
    Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-21-00184-CR

Filed Date: 6/10/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/14/2021