Christopher Jamel Hawkins v. Thestate ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    June 09, 2021
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A21A0382. CHRISTOPHER JAMEL HAWKINS v. THE STATE.
    Christopher Jamel Hawkins pled guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to
    distribute in June 2012, and the trial court sentenced him to ten years to be served on
    probation under the terms of the First Offender Act, OCGA § 42-8-60 et seq. In
    March 2020, the State petitioned to revoke Hawkins’s probation based on his
    commission of new offenses and other violations of his probation. Following a
    hearing, the trial court concluded that Hawkins had violated the terms of his
    probation, revoked his first offender status, and re-sentenced him to 20 years on the
    original charge, giving him credit for time served. Hawkins filed this direct appeal,
    arguing that the trial court erred in considering “mere arrests and/or untried
    indictments” in re-sentencing him. We lack jurisdiction.
    “In determining the proper procedure to follow in pursuing an appeal, the
    underlying subject matter generally controls over the relief sought.” Self v. Bayneum,
    
    265 Ga. 14
    , 14-15 (453 SE2d 27) (1995). Because the underlying subject matter of
    this appeal is the revocation of Hawkins’s probation, he was required to file an
    application for discretionary appeal in order to obtain review of the sentencing order
    he seeks to challenge in this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5), (b); Todd v. State,
    
    236 Ga. App. 757
    , 758 (513 SE2d 287) (1999); Zamora v. State, 
    226 Ga. App. 105
    ,
    105 (485 SE2d 214) (1997) (the discretionary appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-35
    (a) (5) is applicable to the revocation of “first offender” probation). “Compliance with
    the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human
    Resources, 
    221 Ga. App. 257
    , 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Hawkins’s failure to follow
    the proper procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is
    hereby DISMISSED. See White v. State, 
    233 Ga. App. 873
    , 874 (505 SE2d 228)
    (1998).
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    06/09/2021
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A21A0382

Filed Date: 6/15/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/15/2021