Earlando Harrison v. Artisha Gregg ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 18-7230
    EARLANDO HARRISON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ARTISHA GREGG, Commonwealth’s Attorney; TIMOTHY FORBES, Hampton
    Police Detective,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00525-HEH-RCY)
    Submitted: February 21, 2019                                 Decided: February 26, 2019
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Earlando Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Earlando Harrison appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
    his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failure to comply with the court’s prior order
    directing him to either pay the filing fee or execute a consent form to authorize
    installment payments. Subsequent to the entry of the district court’s dismissal order,
    Harrison filed a consent form authorizing collection of fees, and the district court directed
    that the complaint be refiled as a new civil action. Because a decision by this court
    would not have “a practical effect on the outcome of this case,” we dismiss as moot
    Harrison’s appeal. SAS Inst., Inc. v. World Programming Ltd., 
    874 F.3d 370
    , 390 (4th
    Cir. 2017), cert. denied, 
    139 S. Ct. 67
    (2018). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-7230

Filed Date: 2/26/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021