Michael Williams v. Jessica Santiago , 710 F. App'x 326 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        JAN 25 2018
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS,                            No. 17-15834
    Plaintiff-Appellant,            D.C. No. 1:16-cv-01065-MJS
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    JESSICA SANTIAGO, Unit Supervisor at
    Coalinga State Hospital,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of California
    Michael J. Seng, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
    Submitted January 16, 2018**
    Before:      REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
    Michael B. Williams, a civil detainee under California’s Sexually Violent
    Predators Act, appeals pro se from the magistrate judge’s order dismissing his 42
    U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation and due process violations. We have
    jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether the magistrate
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    judge validly entered judgment on behalf of the district court. Allen v. Meyer, 
    755 F.3d 866
    , 867-68 (9th Cir. 2014). We vacate and remand.
    Williams consented to proceed before the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.
    § 636(c). The magistrate judge then screened and dismissed Williams’s action
    before the named defendant had been served. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
    Because all parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to proceed before
    the magistrate judge for jurisdiction to vest, Williams v. King, 
    875 F.3d 500
    , 503-
    04 (9th Cir. 2017), we vacate the magistrate judge’s order and remand for further
    proceedings. To the extent that Williams requests appointment of counsel on
    remand (Docket Entry No. 4), the request is denied without prejudice to Williams
    requesting appointment of counsel by the district court.
    Williams’s request that his pending appeals, Case Nos. 17-15530, 17-15834,
    and 17-16790, be assigned to the same merits panel (Docket Entry No. 4) is
    granted.
    VACATED and REMANDED.
    2                                    17-15834
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-15834

Citation Numbers: 710 F. App'x 326

Filed Date: 1/25/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023