United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria , 323 F. App'x 309 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    FILED
    April 15, 2009
    No. 08-50848
    Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    JOSE LEON GONZALEZ-LONGORIA, also known as Alfred Martinez, also
    known as Juan Vela
    Defendant-Appellant
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. 5:92-CR-65-1
    Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Jose Leon Gonzalez-Longoria, Jr., federal prisoner # 59761-079, seeks
    leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the denial for lack of
    jurisdiction of his motion to show cause why the Government had not filed a
    motion under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3573
     for remission of his $200,000 fine. The district
    court denied IFP and certified that Gonzalez-Longoria’s appeal was not taken
    in good faith.      By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Gonzalez-Longoria is
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
    be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 08-50848
    challenging the district court’s certification. See Baugh v. Taylor, 
    117 F.3d 197
    ,
    202 (5th Cir. 1997); F ED. R. A PP. P. 24(a)(5).
    On appeal, Gonzalez-Longoria does not addresses the threshold issue of
    whether the district court had jurisdiction to consider his motion to show cause.
    Gonzalez-Longoria’s motion to show cause was an unauthorized motion that the
    district court was without jurisdiction to entertain. See United States v. Early,
    
    27 F.3d 140
    , 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Gonzalez-Longoria’s appeal is from the denial
    of that unauthorized motion.
    Gonzalez-Longoria’s appeal does not involve legal points arguable on their
    merits, and it is therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King, 
    707 F.2d 215
    , 220 (5th
    Cir. 1983). Accordingly, Gonzalez-Longoria’s IFP motion is DENIED, and the
    appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 
    117 F.3d at 202
    ; 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-50848

Citation Numbers: 323 F. App'x 309

Judges: Benavides, Haynes, Jolly, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 4/15/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023