State v. Ball, Unpublished Decision (5-19-2006) , 2006 Ohio 2485 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  • DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
    {¶ 1} These consolidated appeals are before the court from judgments of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas which resentenced defendant-appellant, James P. Ball, upon remand from this court. In Lucas County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR 02-3063, Ball was sentenced to serve a term of three years in prison, after having been convicted of one count of robbery. In Lucas County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR 03-1128, Ball was sentenced to serve a term of four years in prison, after having been convicted of another count of robbery. The sentences were ordered to be served consecutively. Ball now challenges those sentences through the following assignment of error:

    {¶ 2} "I. The sentence imposed was contrary to law."

    {¶ 3} Upon review, we find that these cases are controlled by the Supreme Court of Ohio's decision in State v. Foster,109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856. In Foster, the court held that R.C. 2929.14(E)(4) violates the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to Blakely v. Washington (2004),542 U.S. 296, and Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), 530 U.S. 466. Because the trial court relied on an unconstitutional statute when sentencing appellant, we find that the sentences are void and must be vacated. Foster, supra at ¶ 103-104. Accordingly, appellant's sole assignment of error is well-taken.

    {¶ 4} On consideration whereof, this court finds that the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas erred in sentencing appellant and the judgments are reversed. The sentences are hereby vacated and the cases are remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with Foster. The state is ordered to pay the costs of these appeals pursuant to App.R. 24. Judgment for the clerk's expense incurred in preparation of the records, fees allowed by law, and the fees for filing the appeals is awarded to Lucas County.

    JUDGMENTS REVERSED.

    A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. See, also, 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 4, amended 1/1/98.

    Handwork, J. Pietrykowski, J. Skow, J. concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: Court of Appeals Nos. L-05-1215, L-05-1216, Trial Court No. CR-2002-3063., CR-2003-1128.

Citation Numbers: 2006 Ohio 2485

Judges: PIETRYKOWSKI, J.

Filed Date: 5/19/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021