eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 Federal Courts
 US Court of Appeals Cases
 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 2017-10

Roderick Mitchell v. Daniel Stone , 699 F. App'x 719 ( 2017 )


Menu:
 
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        OCT 26 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RODERICK L. MITCHELL,                           No. 17-15631
Plaintiff-Appellant,            D.C. No. 2:14-cv-02994-GEB-DB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DANIEL STONE; ROBERT
AMBROSELLI,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 23, 2017**
Before:      McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Roderick L. Mitchell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising
from the imposition of certain parole conditions. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Decker v. Advantage Fund Ltd.,
    362 F.3d 593
    , 595-96
(9th Cir. 2004). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Hell’s
Angels Motorcycle Corp. v. McKinley,
    360 F.3d 930
    , 933 (9th Cir. 2004). We
affirm.
Dismissal of Roderick’s claim for monetary damages was proper because
defendants are entitled to absolute immunity for the imposition of the challenged
parole conditions. See Thornton v. Brown,
    757 F.3d 834
    , 840 (9th Cir. 2014)
(parole officers are entitled to absolute immunity against claims for damages
arising from imposition of parole conditions).
The district court properly dismissed Roderick’s claim for injunctive relief
as moot because Roderick is no longer on parole subject to the challenged
conditions. See Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles,
    279 F.3d 862
    , 871 (9th
Cir. 2002) (“An actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review, not
merely at the time the complaint is filed.”).
AFFIRMED.
2                                  17-15631