-
{¶ 43} As the principal opinion aptly notes, intermediate appellate courts are obligated to follow Ohio Supreme Court decisions. For this reason and this reason alone, I reluctantly agree with the principal opinion's affirmance of the trial court's judgment.
{¶ 44} Interestingly, I note that a vast majority of the other jurisdictions that have considered the issue raised in Scott-Ponzer v.Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. (1999),
85 Ohio St.3d 660 ,710 N.E.2d 1116 have apparently reached a conclusion opposite to the conclusion drawn by the Ohio Supreme Court. See Foote v. Royal Ins. Co. of America (1998),88 Haw. 122 ,124-125 ,962 P.2d 1004 ,1006-1007 and the cases cited therein.{¶ 45} Moreover, as Justice Stratton states in her dissenting opinion in Scott-Ponzer, it is inherent that a commercial insurance policy, purchased by a corporation and written for a corporation (or, by extension, a board of education) applies to the corporate entity and those acting within the scope of employment for that entity. A commercial policy should not be construed to provide uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage in a situation that involves personal, non-employment related activities of an employee (or a member of the employee's family). Nevertheless, the Scott-Ponzer decision must be followed unless and until the Ohio Supreme Court decides to revisit this issue.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 02CA8.
Judges: EVANS, P.J.
Filed Date: 2/18/2003
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021