Amend16RobertWirengard v. Commissioner , 2005 T.C. Memo. 30 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                         
    T.C. Memo. 2005-30
    UNITED STATES TAX COURT
    AMEND16ROBERTWIRENGARD, Petitioner v.
    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
    Docket No. 18437-03X.           Filed February 22, 2005.
    R.O. Wirengard (an officer), for petitioner.
    Helen F. Rogers, for respondent.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    WELLS, Judge:   In a final adverse determination letter,
    respondent determined that petitioner did not qualify for
    exemption from Federal income taxation pursuant to section 501(a)
    as an organization described in section 501(c)(3).1   Having
    1
    Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to
    the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references
    (continued...)
    - 2 -
    exhausted its administrative remedies, petitioner challenged
    respondent’s determination by timely filing a petition for a
    declaratory judgment pursuant to section 7428(a).   The
    administrative record was submitted to the Court by joint motion
    pursuant to Rules 122 and 217(b).   For purposes of the instant
    proceeding, the facts and representations contained in the
    administrative record are accepted as true and are incorporated
    herein by reference.   The sole issue to be decided is whether
    petitioner qualifies for tax exemption as an organization
    described in section 501(c)(3).
    Background
    On or about August 16, 2001, petitioner filed a Form 1023,
    Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3)
    of the Internal Revenue Code (Form 1023).   In its Form 1023,
    petitioner reported that it was organized as an association and
    that it had an address in Hillsborough County, Florida.
    In the Form 1023, petitioner reported that it was a school.
    Petitioner’s Web site described petitioner as a “free school”
    whereby education is provided via the Internet on how to obtain a
    microloan; how to establish an IRA; how to obtain health care;
    and how to “think about reality or other religions”.    An article
    on petitioner’s Web site entitled “Article of an Unincorporated,
    1
    (...continued)
    are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.
    - 3 -
    Non-Profit Individual Organization” stated that the purpose of
    the organization is “to educate as many people as possible about
    the existing Amendment 16 of the Constitution of the United
    States of America, its fundamental flaws that are contrary to the
    views of our founding fathers and ways to correct these.”
    Along with its Form 1023, petitioner submitted articles of
    association2 (hereinafter referred to as the Articles).   The
    Articles provided:
    ARTICLE III
    PURPOSES
    Amend16robertwirengard is not for profit and organized
    exclusively for educational, welfare and charitable
    purposes, including to:
    1.   Provide education and advocacy, principally of the
    economic and financial sciences
    2.   Provide for food, shelter, healthcare,
    access/transportation and environments
    3.   Study, research and test welfare, healthcare and
    environmental models
    4.   Identify socio-economic and sustainability
    problems and provide economic solutions
    5.   Assist and organize employees and unemployed and
    unpaid workers for their and children’s welfare
    2
    The record shows that petitioner submitted to respondent
    drafts of its articles of association on three separate
    occasions. Each of the three drafts was dated Aug. 31, 2001.
    The first draft was signed only by Robert Wirengard and submitted
    as an attachment to petitioner’s Form 1023. The second draft,
    set forth above, was identical to the first, except that it was
    signed by all four directors and was submitted by petitioner as
    an attachment to a letter to respondent dated Oct. 9, 2001. The
    third draft was not identical to the first two drafts but was
    substantially similar; it was signed by Robert Wirengard and
    Mauricio Rosas and submitted by petitioner as an attachment to a
    letter to respondent dated Apr. 3, 2003. The signature of
    Mauricio Rosas was dated Apr. 3, 2003.
    - 4 -
    6.   Study, assist and organize economic welfare
    arrangements and alliances for and/or with other
    community concerns, including employee, employer,
    government, faith based, corporate, other business
    and environmental entities
    7.   Publish economic mechanisms and applications based
    on Nobel Laureate types of economic and financial
    theories; as well, publish test conclusions of
    models built, be they successful or failures (and
    how they may be amended or corrected to build a
    sustainable universe)
    *    *    *      *       *   *   *
    ARTICLE VI
    BY-LAWS
    Provisions for the regulations of the internal affairs
    of Amend16robertwirengard are to be determined and set
    forth in the By-Laws. The Board of
    Amend16robertwirengard shall adopt the original By-
    Laws. Thereafter, By-Laws may be adopted, amended or
    repealed by the Board of Directors in accordance with
    the By-Laws. Any decision before the board must be
    concluded with unanimous vote, in favor or against.
    *    *    *      *       *   *   *
    ARTICLE VIII
    OVERSEERS
    The number of Directors of Amend16robertwirengard shall
    be three, or more than three, as fixed from time to
    time by the By-Laws of Amend16robertwirengard. The
    number of Directors constituting the initial Board of
    Directors is four, and the names and addresses of the
    persons who are to serve as directors or overseers
    until their successors are elected or otherwise
    appointed and shall qualify are:
    Robert Wirengard
    6234 Falkenburg Road North
    Fair Share, FL 33610-9491
    (Note, “Fair Share” is not within Tampa city limits, is
    in an unincorporated area of Hillsborough County, and
    - 5 -
    our post office, approving the name so long as the
    correct zip code is used, delivers to our Fair Share
    address).
    Mauricio Rosas
    P.O. Box 7641
    Tampa, FL 33673
    John Larsen
    532 De Resine Carre
    Seffner, FL 33532
    Tom Hoyt
    611 De Resine Carre
    Seffner, FL 33584
    *       *    *   *       *   *   *
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed these Articles of
    Amend16robertwirengard in duplicate this 31st day of
    August 2001, and say that I know the contents thereof
    and am liable for the entity, both economically and
    financially, and to the letter and in the spirit of
    governing laws.
    (Signed ROWirengard)
    Robert Wirengard, FOUNDER, PRINCIPAL AND AGENT
    Mauricio Rosas, Board of Directors
    (Signed Mauricio Rosas)
    Thomas Hoyt, Board of Directors
    (Signed Thomas Hoyt)
    John Larsen, Board of Directors
    (Signed John Larsen)
    Petitioner subsequently submitted to respondent a
    document entitled “Agreement to Amend” (hereinafter referred
    to as the Agreement) in which petitioner agreed to “enact”
    the following amendment to the Articles:
    - 6 -
    a.     The organization is organized exclusively for
    charitable, religious, educational, and/or
    scientific purposes under section 501(c)(3) of the
    Internal Revenue Code.
    b.     No part of the net earnings of the organization
    shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributable
    to, its members, trustees, officers or other
    private persons, except that the organization
    shall be authorized and empowered to pay
    reasonable compensation for services rendered and
    to make payments and distributions in furtherance
    of the purposes set forth in the purpose clause
    hereof. No substantial part of the activities of
    the organization shall be the carrying on of
    propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence
    legislation, and the organization shall not
    participate in, or intervene in (including the
    publishing or distribution of statements) any
    political campaign on behalf of any candidate for
    public office. Notwithstanding any other
    provision of this document, the organization shall
    not carry on any other activities not permitted to
    be carried on (a) by an organization exempt from
    federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the
    Internal Revenue Code, or corresponding section of
    any future federal tax code, or (b) by an
    organization, contributions to which are
    deductible under section 170(c)(2) of the Internal
    Revenue Code, or corresponding section of any
    future federal tax code.
    c.     The organization will not discriminate based on
    gender, race, religion, disability, or ethnic or
    national origin.
    The Agreement stated that the amendment would be adopted in
    accordance with petitioner’s internal rules of operation.      Robert
    Wirengard alone signed the Agreement; the Agreement was not
    signed by all directors as required by Article VI of the
    Articles.
    - 7 -
    As an attachment to a letter dated June 20, 2002,
    petitioner submitted to respondent a document entitled “By-Laws
    of Amend16robertwirengard (Under Review)” (hereinafter referred
    to as the Bylaws).   The Bylaws provided:
    Article I: Name
    Sec. 1. The name of this organization shall be
    Amend16robertwirengard, with its divisions and
    wholeness through the Circle of Life Ministry, United
    Health Payers, United Arrangements, United Affiliations
    and, United Bank, severally and jointly
    Of Amend16robertwirengard
    We are an integral part of our local community,
    Hillsborough County, Florida, and the United States of
    America and our greater community, all territories,
    nations, our Earth and our Universe.
    Article II: Purpose and Policy
    Sec. 1. Purpose. To teach about, apply and treat each
    as each would be treated.
    *     *    *    *       *    *   *
    Article IX: Programs/Divisions
    Sec. 1. Authorization. The Principles of “treating
    each as each would be” and freedom to choose, without
    dictate, threat or coercion, adopted by us as a whole,
    constitute the authorization for the adoption of
    Programs.
    Sec. 2. Programs. The programs shall consist of those
    issues chosen for concerted study and action.
    Sec. 3. Current Agenda and Continuing Responsibilities.
    These categories of programs are defined as follows:
    a. The Current Agenda focuses on universal, market
    priced healthcare, the absence of which in the United
    States, involves a million people in medical mishaps,
    including losses of lives, and a half million personal
    bankruptcies (impoverishments) annually, involving
    healthcare debts. The healthcare issue is eminent as a
    national issue and in local governmental issues limited
    to indigent care through a general sales tax.
    b. The Continuing Responsibilities shall consist of
    working with local government staff in its objective to
    co-pilot universal, market priced healthcare, currently
    - 8 -
    having established a Health Insurance Study Work Group
    relative to this.
    c. The long term agenda, of which healthcare represent
    close to a third, is the elimination of poverty and
    war, or, put positively, having world wide peace
    (unfair activity, violence and terrorism being
    preempted by treating each as each would be: that each
    should have needs met and work and trade freely for
    more than what the needs of sustenance are).
    Article I, section 1, of the Bylaws provides that petitioner
    is organized into five divisions: (1) Circle of Life Ministry;
    (2) United Health Payers; (3) United Arrangements; (4) United
    Affiliations; and (5) United Bank.    Petitioner’s Web site
    provided the following description of the five divisions:
    For welfare purposes and what may be described as
    scientific and experimental models, practical
    applications and/or assistance programs, divisions of
    Amend16robertwirengard exist. These, similar to
    colleges within a university, are:
    United Arrangements of Amend16robertwirengard -
    educational, practical and real welfare application
    purposes and assuring compliance with the Multi
    Employer Welfare Arrangement of the Employee Retirement
    Income Security Act, passed by the U.S. Congress and
    under the U.S. Department of Labor. This school may
    remain in perpetuity until the end of poverty and
    systematic impoverishment.
    United Health Payers of Amend16robertwirengard (Mary
    Lasano, nurse and consultant) - experimental model for
    market-priced, universal healthcare in a non-socialist
    society. Once the success that is envisioned is
    accomplished, it is expected that this one-payer system
    will be bought out at future cost to become an
    efficient one-payer system established as a Government
    Sponsored Entity (much as the U.S. Federal Reserve
    system currently is a GSE).
    United Bank of Amend16robertwirengard (DeVara Sims,
    Tampa Police Dept./reach out, consultant and trustee) -
    a non-profit banking facility for people and businesses
    - 9 -
    to learn about and apply banking products and services;
    establish IRA’s, pooling of funds, also for other
    financial services such as electronic payroll
    depositing for small firms, including, possibly, for
    our no-profit United Health Payers deposits, accruals,
    and disbursements, or employees being able to pull
    partial cash funds from payrolls of their employers for
    a day’s work, as well as store year to date information
    on wages, tax withholdings and benefit costs; micro
    loans to persons and small businesses, mainly for work
    or volunteer initiatives. $8,000 already has been
    donated for this endeavor.
    Circle of Life Ministry of Amend16robertwirengard
    (Merry Wiesenborn, director, volunteer, trustee) -
    provides food and shelter for needy; transportation;
    financial assistance for single mothers, particularly
    those who have experienced violent, physical abuse
    [cash assistance for food, shelter and education plus
    transportation needs, exceeds $5,000, plus $12,000 in
    loaner vehicle assets are tied up]; potential center
    specifically for working with youth involving hate
    crime; religious* studies, discussions and advocacy as
    regards religions of Wiesenborn’s Circle of Life
    Ministry and realism as opposed to or inclusive of
    faiths in a deity or deities (possibly of the more
    modern government preferred religions, such as of
    Judeo-Christianity or Islam, etc.) Its doctrines are
    based on the natural earth and universe, spirit of
    people, “big boom” theory, treating others as one wants
    to be treated, amending where we are wrong, repairing
    where we have hurt, and civil and consensual activities
    as opposed to systematic corruption that can stem from
    the concentration of power in governments or from
    individual violent abuses (often the physical power of
    a man over a woman, rather than logic and
    reasonability; or the difficult challenge of teaching
    children without expeditiously inflicting pain that
    causes long term and deep problems).
    *    *    *    *       *   *   *
    - 10 -
    United Alliances of Amend16robertwirengard3 (Mauricio
    Rosas, independent citizen, activist, and trustee) -
    advocacy and reach out program to join in common
    grounds with other businesses, government, schools and
    universities, community concerned (including those
    concerned with global healthcare, environmental issues
    and community sustainability, from local “Tomorrow
    Matters”, League of Women Voters, Independent Citizens,
    ACLU, Results!, Amnesty International, Planned
    Parenthood to the Federal Reserve Bank of the U.S and
    other central banks, United Nations, International
    Monetary Fund and World Bank), and faith based
    organizations.
    In a letter to respondent dated November 30, 2001,
    petitioner described the organization as a university “based on
    theory”, whereas the five divisions are “subordinate colleges,
    arranged to complete the fundamentals of a 103 T.C. 140
    , 145 (1994), affd. 
    71 F.3d 808
    (11th Cir. 1996); Am. Campaign Acad. v. Commissioner, 
    92 T.C. 1053
    , 1062 (1989); IHC Health Plans, Inc. v. Commissioner, 
    T.C. Memo. 2001-246
    , affd. 
    325 F.3d 1188
     (10th Cir. 2003).    Section
    501(c)(3) provides for the following exempt purposes:    Religious,
    charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary,
    educational, and prevention of cruelty to children or animals.
    Sec. 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(i), Income Tax Regs.
    It is well established that our inquiry focuses on the
    reasons given by the Commissioner for denying an organization’s
    application for exemption.   See Aid to Artisans, Inc. v.
    Commissioner, 
    71 T.C. 202
    , 208 (1978).   Thus, in making our
    declaration, we do not engage in a de novo review of the
    administrative record.   See Am. Campaign Acad. v. Commissioner,
    
    supra at 1063
    ; Church in Boston v. Commissioner, 
    71 T.C. 102
    ,
    105-106 (1978); Houston Lawyer Referral Serv., Inc. v.
    Commissioner, 
    69 T.C. 570
    , 573-574, 577 (1978).
    The first of the section 501(c)(3) requirements mandates
    that an organization be organized exclusively for one or more of
    the exempt purposes.   The exempt purposes requirement is met only
    if the organization satisfies the organizational as well as the
    6
    (...continued)
    intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of
    statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in
    opposition to) any candidate for public office.
    - 14 -
    operational test.   See sec. 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1), Income Tax Regs.
    The organizational test is set forth in section 1.501(c)(3)-
    1(b)(1)(i):
    (i) An organization is organized exclusively for
    one or more exempt purposes only if its articles of
    organization * * * as defined in subparagraph (2) of
    this paragraph:
    (a) Limit the purposes of such organization
    to one or more exempt purposes; and
    (b) Do not expressly empower the organization
    to engage, otherwise than as an insubstantial part
    of its activities, in activities which in
    themselves are not in furtherance of one or more
    exempt purposes.[1]
    [1]
    The term “articles of organization” includes an
    organization’s articles of association. Sec. 1.501(c)(3)-
    1(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.
    Furthermore, to satisfy the organizational test, an organization
    must serve a public rather than a private interest.   See sec.
    1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii), Income Tax Regs; Columbia Park &
    Recreation Association, Inc. v. Commissioner, 
    88 T.C. 1
    , 13
    (1987), affd. without published opinion 
    838 F.2d 465
     (4th Cir.
    1988); Retired Teachers Legal Fund, Inc. v. Commissioner, 
    78 T.C. 280
    , 286 (1982); Baltimore Regl. Joint Bd. Health & Welfare Fund
    v. Commissioner, 
    69 T.C. 554
     (1978).
    Even if an organization’s articles of organization set forth
    purposes no broader than those specified in section 501(c)(3),
    the organization is not organized exclusively for exempt purposes
    if such articles expressly empower it to carry on (other than as
    - 15 -
    an insubstantial part of its activities) activities not in
    furtherance of one or more exempt purposes.    Sec. 1.501(c)(3)-
    1(b)(1)(iii), Income Tax Regs.
    In the instant case, the enumerated activities set forth in
    Article III of the Articles are broad in scope and vague in
    description.7   For instance, the Articles empower petitioner to
    provide economic solutions to identified socioeconomic problems.
    Such activities do not necessarily further an educational or
    charitable purpose regardless of the fact that the Articles state
    that petitioner is organized “exclusively for educational,
    welfare and charitable purposes.”   See 
    id.
        This Court has held,
    however, that the mere existence of power to engage in activities
    other than those set out in section 501(c)(3) does not in itself
    prevent an organization from meeting the organizational test.
    Peoples Translation Serv./Newsfront Intl. v. Commissioner, 
    72 T.C. 42
    , 48 (1979).   A determination of whether an organization
    is organized exclusively for exempt purposes is based on an
    examination not only of the articles of organization but also of
    other evidence in the administrative record.    See Peoples
    Translation Ser./Newsfront Intl. v. Commissioner, supra; Gen.
    7
    The enumerated activities include providing “education and
    advocacy, principally, of the economic and financial sciences”;
    providing healthcare and transportation; testing “welfare,
    healthcare and environmental models”; providing economic
    solutions to identified “socio-economic and sustainability”
    problems; assisting and organizing employees; and organizing
    economic welfare arrangements.
    - 16 -
    Conference of the Free Church of Am. v. Commissioner, 
    71 T.C. 920
    , 927 (1979); Levy Family Tribe Found., Inc. v. Commissioner,
    
    69 T.C. 615
    , 619 (1978).   Consequently, an examination of the
    administrative record in the instant case for evidence that the
    enumerated activities of the Articles will further an exempt
    purpose is appropriate.
    We understand petitioner’s contention to be that it is a
    school organized to disseminate theory to the public at-large via
    petitioner’s Web site and to engage in the practical application
    of such theory through its five divisions.   Petitioner includes
    banking activities among such practical applications.
    As noted above, the Articles expressly empower petitioner to
    identify socioeconomic problems and provide economic solutions.
    Article I of the Bylaws establishes United Bank as one of
    petitioner’s five organizational divisions but does not further
    describe the organization or operations of United Bank.
    Petitioner’s Web site stated that United Bank of
    Amend16robertwirengard would provide banking products and
    services to individuals and businesses.   According to the Web
    site, such services include establishing IRAs, pooling funds,
    electronic payroll deposits for small firms and possibly for
    United Health Payers, accruals, disbursements, and providing
    micro loans.   In its letter of June 20, 2002, petitioner stated
    that United Bank is primarily distinguished from commercial banks
    - 17 -
    in that United Bank is neither incorporated nor a member of the
    FDIC.   Rather, Robert Wirengard assumes all liability related to
    United Bank.   Petitioner stated that loans were to be “of micro-
    level (small) nature to help