Jerry Marable v. State ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
    AT NASHVILLE             FILED
    OCTOBER 1997 SESSION
    December 18, 1997
    Cecil W. Crowson
    Appellate Court Clerk
    JERRY WAYNE MARABLE,                   )
    )
    APPELLANT,          )
    )           No. 01-C-01-9611-CC-00493
    )
    )           Rutherford County
    v.                                     )
    )           J. S. Daniel, Judge
    )
    )           (Post-Conviction Relief)
    STATE OF TENNESSEE,                    )
    )
    APPELLEE.          )
    FOR THE APPELLANT:                          FOR THE APPELLEE:
    Jerry Wayne Marable, Pro Se                 John Knox Walkup
    South Central Correctional Center           Attorney General & Reporter
    P.O. Box 279                                500 Charlotte Avenue
    Clifton, TN 38425-0279                      Nashville, TN 37243-0497
    (Appeal Only)
    Clinton J. Morgan
    Howard W. Wilson                            Counsel for the State
    Attorney at Law                             450 James Robertson Parkway
    6 Public Square, North                      Nashville, TN 37243-0493
    Murfreesboro, TN 37130
    (Trial Court Only)                          William C. Whitesell, Jr.
    District Attorney General
    Justice Building, Third Floor
    Murfreesboro, TN 37130
    Paul A. Holcombe, III
    Assistant District Attorney General
    Justice Building, Third Floor
    Murfreesboro, TN 37130
    OPINION FILED:______________________________
    AFFIRMED
    Joe B. Jones, Presiding Judge
    OPINION
    The appellant, Jerry Wayne Marable (petitioner), 1 appeals as of right from a
    judgment of the trial court dismissing his action for post-conviction relief following an
    evidentiary hearing. The trial court found the petitioner received the effective assistance
    of counsel prior to and during the submission hearing, the petitioner’s plea of guilty was
    understandingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered, and the petitioner failed to establish
    the District Attorney General’s Office engaged in prosecutorial misconduct. In this court,
    the pro se brief filed by the petitioner does not delineate an issue presented for review. It
    appears the petitioner asserts his innocence and claims he was denied his constitutional
    right to the effective assistance of counsel.
    The record reflects the defendant was charged with the rape of a child under the
    age of thirteen. He was permitted to enter a plea of guilty to aggravated sexual battery and
    was sentenced as a Range I standard offender to confinement for eight and one-half years
    in the Department of Correction pursuant to a plea agreement. He advised the trial court
    he was not guilty of the offense in question because the charge was fabricated. He further
    stated he was entering the guilty plea for “my best interest for my family.” The trial court
    refused to accept the plea unless the petitioner agreed there was a factual basis for his
    plea. The petitioner agreed there was a factual basis for his plea.
    The petitioner failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence he was denied
    his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. See 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 40
    -
    30-210(f). He did not testify in support of his grounds. Moreover, the petitioner did not
    establish the two-prong test established in Hill v. Lockart, 
    474 U.S. 52
    , 
    106 S.Ct. 366
    , 
    88 L.Ed.2d 203
     (1985). The submission hearing transcript reveals the petitioner was pleased
    with the services of the attorneys who represented him. Counsel met with the petitioner
    prior to the date he entered the guilty plea. Counsel revealed the information obtained,
    provided the petitioner with copies of statements, and spent several hours explaining the
    ramifications of a guilty plea. The trial court was extremely tolerant and patiently advised
    1
    The petitioner was indicted as “Jerry Wayne Marable A/K/A Jerry DeWayne
    Marable.”
    2
    the petitioner of his rights. The court wanted to make sure the petitioner was in fact
    understandingly, intelligently, and knowingly pleading guilty to the lesser included offense
    of aggravated sexual battery.
    This court is of the opinion the evidence contained in the record does not
    preponderate against the findings of fact made by the trial court.
    ____________________________________________
    JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE
    CONCUR:
    ______________________________________
    WILLIAM M. BARKER, JUDGE
    ______________________________________
    JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01C01-9611-CC-00493

Filed Date: 12/18/1997

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014