Harpeth Valley Utilities Dist. of Davidson and Williamson Counties v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County - Concurring ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •        IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
    AT NASHVILLE
    HARPETH VALLEY UTILITIES                     )
    DISTRICT OF DAVIDSON AND                     )
    WILLIAMSON COUNTIES,                         )
    )
    Plaintiff/Appellant,                   )
    )
    VS.                                          )
    )
    THE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT                  )
    OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON                    )
    COUNTY,                                      )      Davidson Chancery
    )      No. 97-2895-III
    Defendant/Appellee,                    )
    )      Appeal No.
    )      01A01-9711-CH-00686
    RAY BELL, GLENDA BELL, WILLIAM               )
    COBLE, DR. ROY PARKER, JIMMY                 )
    JONES, WESLEY BARNES, FANNIE C.              )
    BUCHANAN, KEITH VAUGHN, JOEL                 )
    CHEEK, DANNY GRAVES, EDDIE                   )
    GRAVES, JERRY GRAVES, ANNIE K.               )
    GRAVES, MACK LOVELL, WANDA                   )
    LOVELL, JOE COLLIER, JIM FESMIRA,            )
    MAC KELL, THOMAS ROGERS, GENE                )
    ROGERS, and GEORGE ROGERS,                   )
    )
    Intervenors-Defendants/Appellees.      )
    CONCURRING OPINION
    We concur with the results of the presiding judge’s opinion because we believe
    that the holding of Davidson County v. Harmon, 
    200 Tenn. 575
    , 
    292 S.W.2d 777
    (1956) controls the outcome of this case. The Harpeth Valley Utility District has
    been operating since 1959 under the aegis of the Utilities Law of 1937 [
    Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 7-82-101
    , -804 (1992 & Supp. 1997)] providing water and sewerage disposal
    services to areas of Davidson, Williamson, and Cheatham Counties. As such, it is a
    governmental entity. See 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 7-82-301
    (a)(1) (Supp. 1997); First
    Suburban Util. Dist. v. McCanless, 
    177 Tenn. 128
    , 132-34, 
    146 S.W.2d 948
    , 950
    (1941). Unless specifically provided otherwise, a city’s zoning power does not
    extend to state government instrumentalities located within its borders. See Davidson
    County v. Harmon, 200 Tenn. at 583-84, 
    292 S.W.2d at 780-81
    .
    While a state governmental entity could be enjoined from maintaining a
    nuisance on its property, see Davidson County v. Harmon, 200 Tenn. at 585, 
    292 S.W.2d at 781
    , there is no evidence in this record that Harpeth Valley’s proposed
    wastewater treatment plant on the Cumberland River, when constructed, will be a
    nuisance. To the contrary, the plans for the plant have already been approved by the
    Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation.
    _____________________________
    WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
    _____________________________
    JERRY SMITH, SPECIAL JUDGE
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01A01-9711-CH-00686

Judges: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.

Filed Date: 7/17/2001

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014