In Re: The Conservatorship of Joyce D. Benny ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
    AT KNOXVILLE
    IN RE: THE CONSERVATORSHIP OF JOYCE D. BENNY
    Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County
    No. 36262     G. Richard Johnson, Chancellor
    No. E2010-00322-COA-R3-CV - FILED AUGUST 3, 2010
    This is an appeal in a conservatorship case. The notice of appeal was mailed via overnight
    delivery. Had the notice of appeal been delivered the next day, it would have been timely.
    Unfortunately, the notice of appeal was not delivered the next day and, therefore, was not
    timely filed. Because the notice of appeal was not filed within thirty (30) days of entry of
    the final judgment, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and this appeal must be
    dismissed.
    Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed
    Joyce B. Denny, Johnson City, Tennessee, pro se.
    Monica Franklin, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Judy S. Wyrick.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
    The order appealed from in this case was entered by the Trial Court on January
    5, 2010. A notice of appeal was filed on February 5, 2010, which is thirty-one (31) days
    from entry of the final judgment. On July 13, 2010, this Court entered an Order directing the
    Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed because the notice of
    appeal was not filed within thirty (30) days and was, therefore, untimely.
    1
    Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides: “This Court, with the concurrence of all
    judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum
    opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum
    opinion it shall be designated ‘MEMORANDUM OPINION,’ shall not be published, and shall not be cited
    or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.”
    Appellant responded to the show-case motion, indicating that the notice of
    appeal was sent via overnight mail on February 3, 2010, and had it been delivered overnight
    as promised by the United States Postal Service, then the notice of appeal would have been
    timely. Thus, Appellant argued that she acted in good faith at all times.
    The requirement that a notice of appeal be filed within thirty (30) days of entry
    of a final judgment cannot be waived. Cobb v. Beier, 
    944 S.W.2d 343
    , 344 n.2 (Tenn. 1997)
    (noting that in civil cases, Tenn. R. App. P. 2 does not permit suspension of the rules to
    extend the time for filing a notice of appeal as prescribed in Rule 4). The requirement that
    a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the final judgment is jurisdictional
    in civil cases. Absent a timely notice of appeal, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction
    and cannot entertain the appeal, even if an appellant has acted in the utmost good faith. See
    Ball v. McDowell, 
    288 S.W.3d 833
    , 837 (Tenn. 2009) (dismissing an appeal because the
    notice of appeal was not filed within thirty (30) days of entry of the final judgment and the
    Court of Appeals, therefore, lacked subject matter jurisdiction).
    Because the notice of appeal in the present case was not filed within thirty (30)
    days of entry of the final judgment, this appeal is dismissed. Costs on appeal are taxed to the
    Appellant, Judy S. Wyrick, and her surety, for which execution may issue, if necessary.
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: E2010-00322-COA-R3-CV

Filed Date: 8/3/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014