Maples, David ( McClain, Codi) v. Professional Personnel Services , 2021 TN WC 172 ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT GRAY
    CODI MCCLAIN, for ) Docket Number: 2019-02-0551
    DAVID MAPLES, )
    Deceased Employee, )
    V. )
    PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL ) State File Number: 977581-2017
    SERVICES, )
    Employer, )
    And )
    AMERICAN ZURICH, ) Judge Brian K. Addington
    Carrier. )
    COMPENSATION ORDER
    GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    This case came before the Court on April 8, 2021, upon Professional Personnel
    Services’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Professional Personnel contends that Codi
    McClain failed to file this case within the applicable one-year statute of limitations, and
    thus it is entitled to summary judgment.! After careful consideration, the Court grants the
    motion.
    History of Claim
    David Maples fell at work on December 16, 2017, and he died later that day.
    Although American Zurich later denied the claim, Professional Personnel voluntarily paid
    Mr. Maples’s funeral expenses on December 21, 2017. Codi McClain, Mr. Maples’s son,
    filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on November 18, 2019, for death benefits. Mr.
    McClain obtained Letters of Limited Administration through the Cocke County Chancery
    Court on January 19, 2021. Afterward, Professional Personnel filed the present motion.
    * Professional Personnel also argued Mr. McClain had no standing to bring the present case. Due to its
    ruling, the Court declines to address that issue.
    Facts
    Professional Personnel filed a Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, summarized as
    follows:
    1. David Maples suffered a medical emergency while he was at work for Professional
    Personnel Services at Bush Brothers and Company on December 16, 2017.
    2. He was taken to the University of Tennessee Medical Center and died on December
    16, 2017.
    3. The Petition for Benefit Determination seeks benefits from Mr. Maples’s December
    16, 2017 death due to a fall at work.
    4. Professional Personnel Services paid funeral expenses as a goodwill gesture for Mr.
    Maples’s family on December 21, 2017.
    5. American Zurich Insurance Company filed a C-23 Notice of Denial for Mr.
    Maples’s death claim on December 23, 2017.
    6. American Zurich Insurance Company did not pay any benefits related to the death
    of David Maples.
    7. Mr. McClain did not file a Petition for Benefit Determination until November 2019.
    Professional Personnel argues that there was no genuine issue as to whether Mr.
    McClain filed this case within the applicable one-year statute of limitations. Mr. McClain
    did not file a response.
    Analysis
    Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to
    interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there
    is NO genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment
    as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04 (2020).
    Professional Personnel, as the moving party, must do one of two things to prevail;
    (1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Mr. McClain’s claim,
    or (2) demonstrate that Mr. McClain’s evidence is insufficient to establish an essential
    element of his claim. 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101
     (2020); see also Rye v. Women’s Care
    Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 
    477 S.W.3d 235
    , 264 (Tenn. 2015).
    If Professional Personnel satisfies one of those burdens, Mr. McClain must respond
    by producing affidavits, pleadings, depositions, responses to interrogatories, or admissions
    that set forth specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial. Tenn. R. Civ. P.
    56.06. If he fails to do so, “summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against the
    [nonmoving] party.” Jd.
    For Mr. McClain to be successful in his claim, he must prove he filed this case
    within one year of Mr. Maples’s death. 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203
    (e)(1). Here,
    Professional Personnel argues that it negated an essential element of Mr. McClain’s claim-—
    his failure to file the case within the one-year statute of limitations. Specifically, the
    undisputed proof shows that the case was filed almost two years after Mr. Maples’s death.
    Mr. Maples acknowledges that he filed the petition after the statute ran, but he asks
    the Court to excuse his late filing because of his difficulties hiring an attorney. However,
    he cites no authority that this reason tolled the statute of limitations, and the Court finds it
    insufficient to toll the statute.
    Therefore, based on the undisputed facts and viewing the evidence in the light most
    favorable to Mr. McClain, the Court finds that Professional Personnel negated an essential
    element of his claim. Thus, it is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.
    IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
    1. Professional Personnel’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Mr. McClain’s
    claim is dismissed on the merits with prejudice to its refiling.
    2. The filing fee of $150.00 is taxed to Professional Personnel under Rule 0800-02-
    21-.06 of the Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations, for which execution
    may issue as necessary.
    3. Professional Personnel shall prepare and submit the SD2 within ten days of the date
    of judgment.
    ENTERED, April 12, 2021.
    /S/ Brian K. Addington
    BRIAN K. ADDINGTON, JUDGE
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claim
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a correct copy of this Order was sent on April 12, 2021.
    Name Certified | Fax | Email | Service sent to:
    Mail
    John Rosson, xX rossonlaw @aol.com
    Employee’s Attorney rjoyce1960 @yahoo.com
    Mary Beth Maddox, X | mmaddox @fmsllp.com
    Employer’s Attorney
    ri)
    ff /
    /
    ft
    ‘. f 2 .
    Tiny XX
    =I
    ht At(tMin—_
    PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK
    we.courtclerk @tn.gov
    Compensation Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
    If you disagree with this Compensation Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
    Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal to the Workers’
    Compensation Appeals Board, you must:
    1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the
    Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the
    date the compensation hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you
    must serve a copy upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).
    2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
    calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
    any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
    altemative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
    website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-
    completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
    Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
    result in dismissal of your appeal.
    3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
    from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. A licensed court
    reporter must prepare a transcript and file it with the court clerk within fifteen calendar
    days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the
    evidence prepared jointly by both parties within fifieen calendar days of the filing of the
    Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate
    account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement
    of the evidence before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals
    Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the
    absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to
    meaningful appellate review.
    4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the court clerk transmits
    it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties. The appealing
    party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the
    Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation
    Appeals Board.
    To appeal your case directly to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Compensation Hearing
    Order must be final and you must comply with the Tennessee Rules of Appellate
    Procedure. If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s
    Order will become final by operation of law thirty calendar days after entry. See 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239
    (c)(7).
    For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
    NOTICE OF APPEAL
    Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
    www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/
    wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667
    Docket No.:
    State File No.:
    Date of Injury:
    Employee
    Employer
    Notice is given that
    [List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]
    appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
    Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-
    stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):
    CZ Expedited Hearing Order filed on CD Motion Order filed on
    C1 Compensation Order filed on Oi Other Order filed on
    issued by Judge
    Statement of the Issues on Appeal
    Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
    Parties
    Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): [o Employerl | Employee
    Address: Phone:
    Email:
    Attorney’s Name: BPR#:
    Attorney’s Email: Phone:
    Attorney’s Address:
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082
    Employee Name: Docket No.: Date of Inj.:
    Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): [| Employer [Employee
    Appellee’s Address: Phone:
    Email:
    Attorney’s Name: BPR#:
    Attorney’s Email: Phone:
    Attorney’s Address:
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, , certify that | have forwarded a
    true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
    in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
    case on this the day of , 20
    [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2019-02-0551

Citation Numbers: 2021 TN WC 172

Judges: Brian K. Addington

Filed Date: 4/12/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/22/2021