Clarke v. Bank of Sarasota , 92 Fla. 1018 ( 1926 )

The record in this cause has been examined and the motion to dismiss for lack of proper parties is granted on authority of Sherlock v. Couper, 43 Fla. 51, 29 South. Rep. 444; Bridges Co. v. Carlton, 56 Fla. 843, 48 South. Rep. 46; Bate v. Cook,89 Fla. 40, 103 South. Rep. 126; Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Inv. Co., ___ Fla. 105 South. Rep. 819.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur in the opinion.