Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Talmadge Park ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •      09-2601-ag
    Nat’l Labor Relations Bd. v. Talmadge Park
    1
    2                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    3
    4                           FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
    5
    6                               August Term, 2008
    7
    8
    9   (Submitted: July 15, 2009                    Decided: June 23, 2010)
    10
    11                            Docket No. 09-2601-ag
    12
    13   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
    14
    15   NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,
    16
    17                     Petitioner,
    18
    19               - v.-
    20
    21   TALMADGE PARK,
    22
    23                     Respondent.
    24
    25   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
    26
    27         Before:           JACOBS, Chief Judge, SACK, Circuit Judge,
    28                           and GOLDBERG, Judge.*
    29
    30         The National Labor Relations Board petitions for
    31   enforcement of an order against respondent, Talmadge Park.
    32   The order issued on May 27, 2009 when the Board comprised
    33   only two members, and we accordingly deny the petition on
    34   the basis of New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor
    35   Relations Board, No. 08-1457, 
    2010 WL 2400089
     (June 17,
    36   2010).
    *
    The Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, Judge of the
    United States Court of International Trade, sitting by
    designation.
    1                                Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate
    2                                General Counsel, National Labor
    3                                Relations Board, for Petitioner.
    4
    5                                William A. Ryan, Ryan & Ryan,
    6                                LLC, New Haven, CT, for
    7                                Respondent.
    8
    9    PER CURIAM:
    10       The National Labor Relations Board petitions for
    11   enforcement of an order against respondent, Talmadge Park,
    12   pursuant to 
    29 U.S.C. § 160
    (e).   When the order issued on
    13   May 27, 2009, only two of the Board’s five seats were
    14   filled.   Though the National Labor Relations Act stipulates
    15   a three-member quorum, it also permits the Board to delegate
    16   its authority to a group of three or more members, any two
    17   of whom may constitute a quorum of that delegate group.     See
    18   
    29 U.S.C. § 153
    (b).   Anticipating a triple vacancy, the
    19   Board in 2007 delegated its authority to a three-member
    20   group that continued to exercise the Board’s authority when
    21   the third member of the group vacated his seat.   Such was
    22   the situation when the Board issued the order that is the
    23   subject of this petition.
    24       In Snell Island SNF LLC v. National Labor Relations
    25   Board, 
    568 F.3d 410
     (2d Cir. 2009), we held that two Board
    26   members may exercise the Board’s authority in such
    27   circumstances as a quorum of a three-member delegate group.
    1   See 
    id. at 424
    .    However, the Supreme Court has since
    2   overridden that holding in New Process Steel, L.P. v.
    3   National Labor Relations Board, No. 08-1457, 
    2010 WL 2400089
    4   (June 17, 2010).   See id. at *8.   Recognizing that, on this
    5   point, Snell Island yields to New Process Steel, we conclude
    6   that the Board as constituted did not have the authority to
    7   issue the May 27, 2009 order against Talmadge Park.       The
    8   Board’s petition is denied.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-2601

Filed Date: 6/23/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2014