Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                              KEN PAXTON
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    March 21, 2018
    The Honorable Matthew C. Poston                             Opinion No. KP-0189
    Liberty County Attorney
    1923 Sam Houston, Suite 202                                 Re: Whether an elected constable and
    Liberty, Texas 77575                                        deputy constables may simultaneously serve
    under the sheriff, specifically to perform
    tasks related to the duties of a weight-
    enforcement officer under Transportation
    Code chapter 621 (RQ-0187-KP)
    Dear Mr. Poston:
    You ask .whether an elected constable and deputy constables may simultaneously serve
    under the sheriff, specifically to perform tasks related to the duties of a weight-enforcement officer
    under Transportation Code chapter 621. 1 Chapter 621 generally grants weight-enforcement
    officers the exclusive authority to enforce vehicle-weight regulations in any area of the State. TEX.
    TRANSP. CODE § 621.408(a). The statutory list of persons who may be a weight-enforcement
    officer includes sheriffs deputies. 
    Id. § 621.401(3).
    You state that a constable and a deputy
    constable for Liberty County are also commissioned as deputy sheriffs. Request Letter at 2.
    The Department of Public Safety (the "Department") has the responsibility to establish
    uniform weighing procedures by rule to ensure that weight-enforcement officers obtain accurate
    measurement of motor vehicle weight. TEX. TRANSP. CODE § 621.402(e)(l). The Department
    may revoke or rescind an officer's weight-enforcement authority if the officer or the officer's law
    enforcement agency fails to comply with those rules. 
    Id. § 621.402(e
    )(2). The Department
    requires a law enforcement agency that employs weight-enforcement officers to enter into a
    memorandum of understanding with the Department and requires officers to complete the
    Department's weight-enforcement training to receive certification as a weight-enforcement
    officer. 37 TEX. ADMIN. CODE§ 4.56(b).
    Your question concerns whether a person's commission as a constable or deputy constable
    disqualifies the person from serving as a weight-enforcement officer, not whether the Department
    should provide its training to any particular persons. We preliminarily consider whether statutes,
    the constitution, or the common law prohibit a constable or deputy constable from serving
    'See Letter from Honorable Matthew C. Poston, Liberty Cty. Att'y, to Honorable• Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y
    Gen. at I, 3 (Oct. I 0, 2017), https://www.texasattorneygen~ral.gov/opinion/requests-for-opinions-rqs ("Request
    Letter").                                                                                         ·
    The Honorable Matthew C. Poston - Page 2                       (KP-0189)
    simultaneously as a sheriffs deputy. First, no statute we are aware of prohibits such simultaneous
    service. See, e.g., TEX. Loe. Gov'T CODE §§ 85.001-.023 (chapter 85, concerning sheriffs and
    deputy sheriffs), 86.001-.025 (chapter 86, concerning constables and deputy constables).
    Second, article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution, where applicable, prohibits a
    person from simultaneously holding or exercising "more than one civil office of emolument."
    TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 40. However, the prohibition applies only if both positions are civil
    offices within the meaning of the constitutional provision. State ex. rel. Hill v. Pirtle, 
    887 S.W.2d 921
    , 931 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (orig.proceeding). Whether a person holds a civil office subject
    to article XVI, section 40 depends on whether the person exercises a sovereign function of the
    government "largely independent of the control of others." 
    Id. Opinions of
    this office determine
    that, while elected constables are constitutional officeholders, deputy sheriffs, who serve at the
    direction and pleasure of the sheriff, do not hold a public office for purposes of article XVI, section
    40. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. GA-0470 (2006) at 4, GA-0402 (2006) at 1. Accordingly, article
    XVI, section 40 does not preclude a person from simultaneously holding the positions of constable
    or deputy constable and the position of deputy sheriff.
    Third, the common-law doctrine of incompatibility also may preclude a person from
    holding two public positions: See Thomas v. Abernathy Cty. Line Indep. Sch. Dist., 
    290 S.W. 152
    ,
    153 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1927, judgm't adopted). Like the constitutional prohibition of dual
    officeholding, however, the common-law doctrine of incompatibility prevents person from    a
    holding two positions only when each position constitutes an office. See 
    id. at 152-53.
    Because
    a deputy sheriff does not hold an office, the common-law doctrine of incompatibility does not
    apply. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0402 (2006) at 2; see also Tex: Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-
    0470 (2006) at 4. In short, neither article XVI, section 40 of the Constitution, nor any statute, nor
    the common-law doctrine of incompatibility prevents a constable or deputy constable from
    simultaneously serving as a deputy sheriff.
    We next consider the persons eligible to be weight-enforcement officers under chapter 621
    of the Transportation Code. Section 621.401 defines "weight enforcement officer" by listing
    persons eligible for the position:
    In this subchapter, "weight enforcement officer" means:
    (3) a sheriff or sheriffs deputy;
    ... ; or
    (6) a constable or deputy constable designated under Section
    621.4015. 2
    2
    Section 621 .40 l 5(a) of the Transportation Code provides:
    (continued ... )
    The Honorable Matthew C. Poston - Page 3                   (KP-0189)
    TEX. TRANSP. CODE§ 621.401(3), (6). Constables and deputy constables not mentioned in section
    621.401 are not authorized by that section to be weight-enforcement officers. See Head v. State,
    
    96 S.W.2d 981
    , 982 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936) (holding that a statute that gave authority to weigh
    vehicles to Department weight inspectors did not give such authority to constables or other peace
    officers). By authorizing some constables and deputy constables, section 621.401 indicates that
    other constables and deputy constables are excluded under the statutory construction doctrine that
    "the expression of one implies the exclusion of others." Mid-Century Ins. Co. of Tex. v. Kidd, 
    997 S.W.2d 265
    , 273-74 (Tex. 1999) (discussing the doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius).
    However, your question asks about individuals commissioned as both sheriff's deputies and as
    constable or constable's deputies. The statute's construction must give full effect to subsection
    (3)'s authorization of sheriffs and deputy sheriffs to serve as weight-enforcement officers. Phillips
    v. Beaber, 
    995 S.W.2d 655
    , 658 (Tex. 1999) (holding that courts "must view the statute's terms in
    context, and give them full effect"). Thus, the fact that such individuals may not have weight-
    enforcement authority as a constable or deputy constable does not affect their weight-enforcement
    authority as a deputy sheriff. Accordingly, section 621.401 allows a person commissioned as a
    sheriff's deputy to serve as a weight-enforcement officer even if the person is also commissioned
    as a constable or constable's deputy. See TEX. TRANSP. CODE§ 621.401(3).
    (a) A county commissioners court may designate a constable or deputy constable
    of the county as a weight enforcement officer in a county:
    (1) that is a county with a population of 1.5 million or more and is within 200
    miles of an international border; or
    (2) that is adjacent to a county with a population of 3 .3 million or more; and
    (3) in which a planned community is located that has 20,000 or more acres of
    land, that was originally established under the Urban .Growth and New
    Community Development Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. Section 4501 et seq.), and
    that is subject to restrictive covenants containing ad valorem or annual
    variable budget based assessments on real property.
    TEX. TRANSP. CODE§ 621.4015(a).
    The Honorable Matthew C. Poston - Page 4        (KP-0189)
    SUMMARY
    Neither article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution,
    nor any statute, nor the common-law doctrine of incompatibility
    precludes a constable or constable's deputy from serving
    simultaneously as a sheriffs deputy. A deputy sheriff may serve as
    a weight-enforcement officer under section 621.401 of the
    Transportation Code, even if the person simultaneously serves as a
    constable or deputy constable.
    Very truly yours,
    KEN PAXTON
    Attorney General of Texas
    JEFFREY C. MATEER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    BRANTLEY STARR
    Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
    VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    WILLIAM A. HILL
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KP-0189

Judges: Ken Paxton

Filed Date: 7/2/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/21/2018