Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                 KEN PAXTON
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    November 7, 2016
    The Honorable Wiley B. McAfee                               Opinion No. KP-0118
    District Attorney
    33rd & 424th Judicial Districts                             Re: Election questions related to ballot image
    Post Office Box 725                                         storage, the production of tally lists by election
    Llano, Texas 78643                                          judges, and remedies for the unauthorized
    exclusion of a poll watcher (RQ-0126-KP)
    Dear Mr. McAfee:
    You ask three questions regarding certain requirements related to various election
    procedures. 1 You first ask whether electronic voting systems must store "an image of the ballot
    that contains the items listed in Chapter 52 of the Election Code, including a number assigned to
    each individual ballot, the nature and date of the election, the designation of 'OFFICIAL
    BALLOT,' and a voting square to the left of the candidate's name." Request Letter at 2. Title 5
    of the Election Code addresses "Election Supplies," and within that title, chapter 52, subchapter
    C, of the Election Code prescribes specific requirements for the form of an official ballot. 2 TEX.
    ELEC. CODE§§ 52.061-.075.
    Title 8 of the Election Code addresses voting systems, and within that title, section 128.001
    establishes computerized voting standards. Id.§ 128.00l(a). That section provides:
    The secretary of state shall prescribe procedures to allow for the use
    of a computerized voting system. The procedures must provide for
    the use of a computerized system with:
    1
    See Letter from Honorable Wiley B. McAfee, Dist. Att'y, 33d & 424th Jud. Dists., to Honorable Ken
    Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen. at 2-5 (Sept. 6, 20 I 6) ("Request Letter"), https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinion/
    requests- for-opinion-rqs.
    2
    Relevant to your request, ballots "shall be numbered consecutively beginning with the number 'I'." TEX.
    ELEC. CODE§ 52.062. "A designation of the nature of the election and the date of the election shall be printed at the
    top of the ballot." 
    Id. § 52.063.
    '"OFFICIAL BALLOT' shall be printed in large letters on the ballot immediately
    below the designation and date of the election." 
    Id. § 52.064.
    "A square for voting shall be printed to the left of each
    candidate's name on a ballot." 
    Id. § 52.070(a).
    The Honorable Wiley B. McAfee - Page 2                    (KP-0118)
    (1) multiple voting terminals for the input of vote selections on the
    ballot presented by a main computer; and
    (2) a main computer to coordinate ballot presentation, vote
    selection, ballot image storage, and result tabulation.
    
    Id. (emphasis added).
    As you note, the Election Code does not define "ballot image." Request
    Letter at 2. The Secretary of State has defined "ballot image" in the computerized voting system
    context as "[e]lectronically produced records of all votes cast by a single voter."3 You suggest
    that the term should be defined as "what the voter sees or reads when in the ballot booth casting a
    vote." 
    Id. at 3.
    This same question is the subject of pending litigation, which is currently before the Third
    Court of Appeals of Texas in Pressley v. Casar, No. 03-15-00368-CV (3d Ct. App. Tex. June 15,
    2015). 4 In that election contest case, the appellant asserted at trial that a computerized voting
    system used by Travis County did not comply with section 128.001 of the Election Code because
    the system stored only cast vote records and not "images of the ballot presented to voters by the
    computerized voting system." 5 In response, appellee argued that the definition of ballot image did
    not require "any pixelated version of a physical ballot or that all parts of the actual ballot be
    retained, only an electronic representation of the vote on each ballot." 6 The district court granted
    appellee's no evidence motion for summary judgment, which appellant now challenges on appeal.
    See Appellant's Brief at 3--4. The first issue you raise in your request is therefore the subject of
    pending litigation, although a number of potential procedural avenues exist for the final resolution
    of that litigation. It is possible that in deciding this case, the Third Court of Appeals may not reach
    the issue of whether or to what extent electronic voting systems must store a ballot image. The
    court could remand the case back to the district court for further proceedings or could decide the
    appeal without directly addressing this question. However, until the litigation is finally resolved,
    your question regarding ballot images remains an open question that is the subject of pending
    litigation.
    Declining to answer a question that is the subject of pending litigation is a long-standing
    policy of this agency. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. GA-0502 (2007) at 3--4, MW-205 (1980)
    at 1, V-291 ( 194 7) at 5-6. This policy is based upon the fact that the ultimate determination of a
    3
    See Brief of Lindsey Wolf, Gen. Counsel, Tex. Sec'y of State, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen.
    at 6 (Sept. 20, 2016) (on file with the Op. Comm.).
    4
    The Third Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in this appeal on April 27, 2016.
    5
    See Appellant's Briefat 21-22, Pressley v. Casar, No. 03-15-00368-CV (3d Ct. App. Tex. Sept. 16, 2015),
    http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=03-15-00368-CV &coa=coa03.
    6
    See Appellee's Brief at 27, Pressley v. Casar, No. 03-15-00368-CV (3d Ct. App. Tex. Jan. 15, 2016),
    http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=03- l 5-00368-CV&coa=coa03.
    The Honorable Wiley B. McAfee - Page 3                      (KP-0118)
    law's applicability, meaning, or constitutionality is left to the courts. Attorney general opinions,
    unlike those issued by courts of law, are advisory in nature. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-
    1003 (2013) at 1 ("The purpose of an attorney general opinion is to attempt to determine how
    Texas courts would rule on the legal question presented by the opinion request."). By contrast,
    court decisions are binding unless and until they have been modified or overturned by a higher
    court or until the law they construe has been amended. Court rulings themselves are a task that
    article V of the Texas Constitution confers on the courts as their primary role. See TEX. CONST.
    art. V, § 1 (vesting the "judicial power of this State" in the courts). Answering a specific question
    through an attorney general opinion that is pending with a court would usurp this constitutional
    structure. Consequently, when a legal matter is being litigated, the courts are generally the
    appropriate forum for resolving the issue, rather than this office through an advisory opinion. We
    therefore decline to answer your first question at this time and defer to the Third Court of Appeals'
    determination of this issue. If your question remains unresolved upon conclusion of the pending
    litigation, you may resubmit a request on this issue at that time.
    In your second question, you ask whether the Election Code requires the election judge at
    each polling location to print, sign, and return to the county election officer a tally list and precinct
    returns "recording the number of votes for each candidate for early voting results" as is required
    for election-day results. Request Letter at 3. You specifically point to sections 65.004 and 65.005
    of the Election Code, which require the maintenance and verification of tally lists "at the polling
    place to record the number of votes received for the candidates and for and against the measures
    voted on." 
    Id. at 4;
    TEX. ELEC. CODE §§ 65.004, .005. You suggest that the "statutes do not
    distinguish between early voting and election day results," requiring a tally list at each stage.
    Request Letter at 4.
    However, reviewing the Election Code as a whole reveals that the Legislature has
    established separate and distinct procedures for processing early voting returns and election-day
    returns. See City of Waco v. Kelley, 
    309 S.W.3d 536
    , 542 (Tex. 2010) (explaining that courts
    "examine the Legislature's words in context of the statute as a whole and [do] not consider words
    or parts of the statute in isolation"). Title 6 of the Election Code, titled "Conduct of Elections,"
    contains the provisions you raise. See TEX. ELEC. CODE §§ 61.001-68.055; Request Letter at 4.
    Chapter 65 of that title establishes procedures for counting votes and preparing returns. See TEX.
    ELEC. CODE §§ 65.001-.060. Section 65.001 provides that "[a]t each polling place, the ballots
    shall be counted by one or more teams of election officers assigned by the presiding judge," and
    subsequent sections detail how and when the counting occurs. Id.§ 65.001; see also id.§§ 65.002
    ("Time for Counting"), 65.005 ("Tallying the Votes"). 7 Once the election officers complete the
    vote count, "the presiding judge shall prepare the returns of the election for the precinct." 
    Id. § 65.014(a).
    The presiding judge includes in those returns: "(1) the total number of voters who
    voted at the polling place ... ; and (2) the total number of votes counted for each candidate and for
    and against each measure." 
    Id. § 65.014(b).
    7 Election   judges are appointed for each election precinct in which an election is held. TEX. ELEC. CODE
    § 32.00 I (a).
    The Honorable Wiley B. McAfee - Page 4                  (KP-0118)
    Title 7 of the Election Code, titled "Early Voting," establishes separate procedures for
    casting and counting early voting ballots. See 
    id. §§ 81.001-114.008.
    Within that title, the
    Legislature has provided that the "other titles of [the Election Code] apply to early voting except
    provisions that are inconsistent with [title 7] or that cannot feasibly be applied to early voting."
    
    Id. § 81.002.
    Chapter 87 of title 7 establishes procedures for processing early voting results. 
    Id. §§ 87.001-.126.
    Section 87.001 creates early voting ballot boards "to process early voting results,"
    and the Legislature has charged those boards with counting the early voting ballots and preparing
    the returns. 
    Id. §§ 87.001,
    87.061-.062. Unlike electionjudges who serve individual precincts,
    the early voting ballot board processes early voting results for the full territory served by the early
    voting clerk. 
    Id. § 87.001.
    8 Rather than have election officers at each polling place count the
    ballots and create tally lists and precinct returns, as occurs on election day, section 87.021 directs
    the early voting clerk to deliver the sealed ballot boxes to the early voting ballot board, along with
    keys to each box, for counting. 
    Id. § 87.021(1);
    cf 
    id. § 65.001.
    The early voting ballot board is
    then required to "count the ballots and prepare the returns in accordance with the procedure
    applicable to paper ballots cast at a precinct polling place." 
    Id. § 87.062(b).
    Section 85.032
    provides that once an early voting ballot box is locked for use in an election, it "may not be
    unlocked except as provided" by the subtitle in the Election Code addressing early voting. 
    Id. § 85.032(a).
    Because section 87.062 authorizes only the early voting ballot board to open the early
    voting ballot boxes, it is inconsistent with the election-day procedure in section 65.001, requiring
    the ballots to be counted at each individual polling place. Section 65.001 is therefore not applicable
    to early voting, and the early voting ballot board, rather than the election judge at each polling
    location, counts the ballots and prepares the returns. 
    Id. § 81.002
    (providing that provisions of
    other titles do not apply to title 7 if they are inconsistent with title 7).
    In your final question, you ask what remedies exist "if an elections administrator excludes
    a poll watcher's access to any of the authorized activities provided in the Election Code." Request
    Letter at 4. Chapter 33 of the Election Code provides for the appointment of watchers "to observe
    the conduct of an election on behalf of a candidate, a political party, or the proponents or opponents
    of a measure." TEX. ELEC. CODE § 33.001; see also 
    id. §§ 33.002-.005
    (listing the specific
    individuals who may appoint watchers). Section 33.056 generally provides that "a watcher is
    entitled to observe any activity conducted at the location at which the watcher is serving."9 
    Id. § 33.056(a).
    In addition, watchers may "observe the inspection and securing of [voting system]
    equipment in the jurisdiction of the authority responsible for distributing election supplies to the
    polling place at which the watcher is appointed to serve" and may accompany an election officer
    delivering election records. 
    Id. §§ 33.059(a),
    .060(a).
    8
    Depending on the nature of the election, the territory served by the early voting clerk may encompass a
    county, city, or another political subdivision. 
    Id. §§ 83.002
    ("County Clerk as Early Voting Clerk"), .005 ("Clerk
    for City Elections"), .007 ("Clerk for Other Elections").
    9 Subsection33.057(b) makes one exception, providing that "[a] watcher may not be present at the voting
    station when a voter is preparing the voter's ballot or is being assisted by a person of the voter's choice." 
    Id. § 33.057(b).
    The Honorable Wiley B. McAfee - Page 5                   (KP-0118)
    Section 33.061 of the Election Code makes it a Class A misdemeanor for a person serving
    in an official capacity at a location at which the presence of watchers is authorized to prevent a
    watcher from observing an activity the watcher is entitled to observe. 
    Id. § 33.061.
    In addition to
    this criminal provision aimed at preventing unlawful obstruction of watchers, title 14 of the
    Election Code establishes procedures for an election contest. 10 Id.§§ 221.001-243.013. In such
    proceedings, the relevant tribunal hearing the contest must ascertain whether the outcome of the
    election is inaccurate due to "an election officer or other person officially involved in the
    administration of the election: (A) prevent[ing] eligible voters from voting; (B) fail[ing] to count
    legal votes; or (C) engag[ing] in other fraud or illegal conduct[.]" Id.§ 221.003(a). If the tribunal
    "cannot ascertain the true outcome of the election," it "shall declare the election void" and order a
    new election. 
    Id. § 221.012(b);
    see also id.§ 221.014(a) (allocating costs of a new election ordered
    by a tribunal).
    10Chapter 221 does not apply to "(I) a general or special election for the office of United States senator or
    United States representative; (2) an election on a measure that is for advisory purposes only; or (3) a presidential
    primary election." Id § 221.001.
    The Honorable Wiley B. McAfee - Page 6          (KP-0118)
    SUMMARY
    Through title 7 of the Election Code, the Legislature has
    established separate procedures for counting the ballots and
    processing early voting returns. Section 87.021 of the Election Code
    requires that early voting clerks deliver secure ballot boxes to the
    early voting ballot board. Section 87.062 then requires the early
    voting ballot board to count the ballots and prepare returns.
    Section 33.061 of the Election Code makes it a Class A
    misdemeanor for a person serving in an official capacity at a location
    at which the presence of watchers is authorized to prevent a watcher
    from observing an activity the watcher is entitled to observe. Title
    14 of the Election Code establishes procedures for an election
    contest if the true outcome of the election is in dispute due to an
    election officer or other person officially involved in the
    administration of the election: (A) preventing eligible voters from
    voting; (B) failing to count legal votes; or (C) engaging in other
    fraud or illegal conduct.
    Very truly yours,
    ~?~
    KEN PAXTON
    Attorney General of Texas
    JEFFREY C. MATEER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    BRANTLEY STARR
    Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
    VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KP-0118

Judges: Ken Paxton

Filed Date: 7/2/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/10/2017