Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •  *- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL . STATE OF TEXAS
    JOHN CORNYN
    February 12,2002
    The Honorable Tom Ramsay                              Opinion No: JC-0462
    Chair, County Affairs Committee
    Texas House of Representatives                        Re: Effect on a constable’s duties when his precinct
    P.O. Box 2910                                         is abolished by redistricting  (RQ-0432-JC)
    Austin, Texas 78768-2910
    Dear Representative     Ramsay:
    You inquire about the duties of a constable whose precinct was abolished as a result of
    redistricting and who has been has been reassigned to another precinct in which an elected constable
    serves. Article V, section 18(c) of the Texas Constitution provides that a constable serves out his
    term in the precinct in which he resides, even though the precinct to which he was elected was
    abolished by a change of boundaries or his continued service temporarily results in extra constables
    serving in a precinct. The constable’s legal duties and powers are not changed by the change of
    boundaries, and the commissioners court continues to set his salary and expenses and to approve the
    appointment of his deputies as it did before the precinct boundaries were redrawn.
    You inform us that the Bexar County Commissioners           Court recently accomplished a
    redistricting of the justice of the peace and constable precincts.’ The constable of precinct five was
    elected to a four-year term in the year 2000 and his term began in 2001. Longoria Letter, supra note
    1, at 1. In August of 2001, the commissioners court redrew the precinct boundary lines, effectively
    abolishing constable precinct five, and placed the constable of precinct five in precinct one. 
    Id. The court
    then designated the constable of precinct one as the constable of the newly drawn precinct one
    in Bexar County. 
    Id. Your questions
    relate to the duties of the constable elected to the abolished
    precinct five.
    Article V, section 18(a) authorizes the commissioners court of each county to divide the
    county into precincts, the number of precincts depending upon the population classification
    applicable to the county. 
    Id. 9 18(
    a ) ( i.e., counties with a population of 50,000 or more shall be
    ‘Letter from Honorable Tom Ramsay, Chair, County Affairs Committee, Texas House of Representatives, to
    Honorable John Cornyn, Texas Attorney General (Sept. 12, 2001) ( on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter
    Request Letter]; Letter from Honorable John A. Longoria, Texas House of Representatives, to Honorable Tom Ramsay,
    Chair, County Affairs Committee, Texas House of Representatives (Sept. 5,200l) (on file with Opinion Committee)
    [hereinafter Longoria Letter].
    The Honorable Tom Ramsay       - Page 2          (JC-0462)
    divided into not less than four and not more than eight precincts, counties with a population of
    18,000 or more but less than 50,000 shall be divided into not less than two and not more than eight
    precincts). Under this provision, the commissioners court may redraw precinct boundaries as needed
    for the convenience of the people. State ex rel. Dowlen v. Rigsby, 17 Tex. Civ. App. 171,43 S.W.
    271 (Tex. Civ. App. 1897), writ reyd, 91 Tex. 351,43 S.W. 1101 (Tex. 1897)per curiam. With
    certain exceptions, one justice of the peace and one constable are elected in each precinct to a four-
    year term of office. See TEX. CONST. art. V, § 18(a) (circumstances where two or more justices of
    the peace may be elected in a precinct).
    When the commissioners court redraws precinct lines, some of the county’s commissioners,
    justices of the peace and constables may no longer reside in the precincts to which they were elected.
    See Harris County Comm ‘rs Court v. Moore, 
    420 U.S. 77
    (1975) (abstention doctrine invoked in suit
    by justices of the peace and constables displaced by boundary changes because of unsettled state law
    issues). The Texas Supreme Court determined in Tarrant County v. Ashmore, 635 S.W.2d 417,421
    (Tex. 1982), cert denied, 
    459 U.S. 1038
    (1982), that justices of the peace and constables who were
    removed from office by the redrafting of precinct boundary lines had no claim for salaries for
    the unserved portion of their terms. However, article V, section 18 of the Texas Constitution as
    amended now provides that a justice of the peace or constable whose precinct is abolished by the
    redrafting of precinct lines will serve out the term for which he or she was elected. See TEX. CONST.
    art. V, 8 18(c).
    Pursuant to a 1983 amendment, article V, section 18 of the Texas Constitution provides that
    when the boundaries of the precincts are changed, each justice and constable in office or elected to
    a term of office shall
    serve in the precinct in which the person resides for the term to which
    each was elected or appointed, even though the change in boundaries
    places the person’s residence outside the precinct for which he was
    elected or appointed, abolishes the precinct for which he was elected
    or appointed, or temporarily results in extra Justices or Constables
    serving in a precinct.    When, as a result of a change of precinct
    boundaries, a vacancy occurs in the office of Justice of the Peace or
    Constable, the Commissioners        Court shall fill the vacancy by
    appointment until the next general election.
    TEX. CONST.   art. V, 5 18(c); Act ofMay 19,1983,68thLeg.,     R.S., 1983 Tex. Gen. Laws 6721,6722
    (adopted Nov. 8, 1983); 1985 Tex. Gen. & Spec. Laws, Votes on Proposed Amends. to Texas
    Constitution 1875-l 985, App., at C- 19. Other sections of this amendment authorize certain counties
    to have fewer justices of the peace and constable precincts than formerly. See FISCAL NOTE, H. J.R.
    No. 91, 68th Leg., R.S. (1983). Subsection 18(c) provides for a transition in office for justices of
    the peace, constables, and county commissioners each time their precinct boundaries are changed.
    The Honorable    Tom Ramsay      - Page 3          (JC-0462)
    See TEX. LEG. COUNCILINFO.REP. No. 83-4, ANALYSIS OFPROPOSEDCONSTITUTIONAL              AMENDMENTS
    APPEARINGON Nov. 8,1983         BALLOT, at 8 (Aug. 1983); see also TEX. Lot. GOV’T CODE ANN. 4
    81.021(b) (Vernon 1999) (preserving the term of office of commissioner, justice of the peace, or
    constable when a precinct boundary change places the officer’s residence outside the precinct for
    which he or she was elected); Tex. Att’y Gen. LO-93-45 (when precinct boundaries are changed,
    article V, section 18(c) of the Texas Constitution requires that each incumbent will serve in the new
    precinct in which he or she resides on the effective date of the change).
    The constable of former precinct five and the elected constable of precinct one are now both
    serving in precinct one. Your questions relate to the rights and duties of the constable of former
    precinct five in his new precinct.
    You first ask what the constable’s duties are as constable of precinct one. No provision of
    law changes a constable’s duties in a precinct where two constables are temporarily serving because
    of a boundary change. A constable is a peace officer within article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal
    Procedure and therefore has the various powers and duties assigned by statute to peace officers. See
    TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 2.12(2) (Vernon Supp. 2002); see also 
    id. arts. 2.13
    (duties of
    peace officers); 6.05-.07 (Vernon 1997 & Supp. 2002) (p revention of threatened injuries and deaths).
    Chapter 86 of the Local Government Code sets out the duties specifically required of constables.
    Section 86.021 of the Local Government Code requires a constable to execute and return “each
    process, warrant, and precept that is directed to the constable and is delivered by a lawful officer.”
    See TEX. Lot. GOV’T CODE ANN. 8 86.021(a) (Vernon Supp. 2002); see also 
    id. (b)-(d) (additional
    responsibilities   in service of process). Each constable in precinct one is authorized to serve the
    papers directed to him by a district or county court, see TEX. R. CIV. PROC. 15 (Vernon 1979), or by
    the commissioners court, see TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE ANN. 8 81.022(a) (Vernon 1999). Section
    86.021 also provides that the constable “shall attend each justice court held in the precinct.” 
    Id. 9 86.02
    1(e). In the usual case, there is one constable in each justice precinct, and one constable will
    attend each justice court in the precinct. See TEX. CONST. art. V, 9 18(a) (one justice of the peace and
    one constable elected in each precinct, except that in precincts and counties with certain population
    characteristics, two or more justices may be elected). We believe it will be consistent with section
    86.021 of the Local Government Code if one of the two constables in precinct one attends each
    justice court in precinct one. Seegenerally Tex. Att’y Gen. LO-98-101 (constable must attend each
    session of justice court, whatever may be the purpose for which the court is sitting).
    You ask what rights and responsibilities the constable has in directing the activities of
    deputies in the “new” precinct. Article V, section 18 of the Texas Constitution does not provide that
    the deputy constables in the former precinct five will serve in precinct one with the elected constable.
    Accordingly, if the constable of former precinct five wishes to have a deputy or deputies subordinate
    to him, he must apply to the commissioners        court pursuant to section 86.01 l(a) of the Local
    Government Code, showing that it is necessary to appoint a deputy to handle the business of the
    precinct and stating the name of the proposed deputy in the application. See TEX. Lot. GOV’T CODE
    ANN. 5 86.01 l(a) (Vernon 1999). The commissioners court “shall approve and confirm the
    The Honorable       Tom Ramsay   - Page 4         (JC-0462)
    appointment of     the deputy only if the commissioners court determines that the constable needs a
    deputy to handle    the business originating in the precinct. ” 
    Id. If the
    commissioners court authorizes
    a deputy for the    constable, the constable will have the usual rights and responsibilities’in directing
    the activities of  that deputy. See 
    id. 8 86.01
    l(b), (c),* see also 35 DAVID B. BROOKS, COUNTY AND
    SPECIAL DISTRICT LAW 9 20.10 (Texas Practice 1989 8z Supp. 2001). He will not have a right to
    direct the activities of deputies assigned to the other constable of precinct one.
    You ask what salary the constable is to receive. A constable’s salary and expenses are set
    by the commissioners court pursuant to chapter1 52, Subchapter B of the Local Government Code
    at the appropriate time in the county budget cycle. See TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE ANN. 8 152.011 -.013
    (Vernon 1999). This mode of salary-setting applies whether the individual is constable of precinct
    five or of precinct one. See generally Ector County v. Stringer, 843 S.W.2d 477,479 (Tex. 1992);
    Vondy v. Comm’rs Court of Uvalde County, 
    714 S.W.2d 417
    (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1986, writ
    ref d n.r.e.); Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0389 (2001) (salaries of constables must reflect their duties
    under statute).
    The constable’s legal duties and powers are not changed when precinct five is abolished and
    he becomes a constable of precinct one. Each constable in precinct one receives the salary and
    expenses allocated by the commissioners court. See generaZZy Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0389
    (2001) (authority of commissioners court to determine salaries for constables).     Each constable
    supervises the deputies whose appointment has been approved by the commissioners court. There
    will be issues of a practical nature about allocating the work in the precinct between the two
    constables with identical powers and duties, but these are not resolved by statute.
    The Honorable Tom Ramsay       - Page 5          (JC-0462)
    SUMMARY
    Pursuant to article V, section 18(c) of the Texas Constitution,
    a constable will serve out his term of office in the precinct in which
    he resides when the precinct to which he was elected was abolished
    by a change of boundaries, even though his continued service
    temporarily results in extra constables serving in a precinct. The
    legal duties and powers of a constable are not changed by the
    abolition of the precinct to which he was elected through the
    redrawing of precinct boundaries. The commissioners court continues
    to set the constable’s salary and expenses and to approve the
    appointment of his deputies as it did before the precinct boundaries
    were redrawn.
    JOHN     CORNYN
    Attorney General of Texas
    HOWARD G. BALDWIN, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    NANCY FULLER
    Deputy Attorney General - General Counsel
    SUSAN DENMON GUSKY
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Susan L. Garrison
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JC-462

Judges: John Cornyn

Filed Date: 7/2/2002

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017