Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1999 )

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERilL STATE OF TEXAS
JOHN CORNYN
April 12,1999
Mr. John Branson Opinion No. JC-003 1
Fisher County Auditor
P.O. Box 126 Re: Whether section 113.022 ofthe Local Government
Roby, Texas 79543 Code, which requires a county officer who receives
funds to deposit the funds with the county treasurer
within certain time limits, applies to court fees collected
by a district clerk (RQ-1177)
Dear Mr. Branson:
You ask whether section 113.022 of the Local Government Code, which requires a county
officer who receives funds to deposit the funds with the county treasurer within certain time limits,
applies to court fees collected by a district clerk. As a general rule, section 113.022 applies to funds
collected by a district clerk that “belong to the county,” including all fees for “official services”
performed by the district clerk. An express statutory directive regarding the deposit of a particular
fee, however, will prevail over more general statutes regarding the disposition of monies.
We begin with a review of the statutory scheme. Section 113.022 provides as follows:
A county officer who receives funds shall deposit the funds with the
county treasurer on or before the next regular business day after the date on
which the funds are received. If this deadline is not met, the officer must
deposit the funds, without exception, on or before the seventh business day
after the day on which the funds are received. However, in a county with
fewer than 50,000 inhabitants, the commissioners court may extend the
period during which funds must be deposited with the county treasurer, but
the period may not exceed 30 days after the date the funds are received.
TEX. LOCAL GOV'T CODE ANN. $ 113.022 (Vernon 1988).
In Attorney General Opinion DM-396, this office concluded that section 113.022 applies
only to funds belonging to the county and not necessarily to all funds a county officer receives, based
on the provision’s statutory history. In 1985, the legislature inserted the language that is now in
Mr. John Branson - Page 2 (JC-0031)
section 113.022 into former article 1709a, section 2 of the Revised Civil Statutes.’ After the 1985
amendment, article 1709a, section 2 provided in pertinent part as follows:
The County Treasurer in each county of this State shall receive all
moneys belonging to the county from whatever source they may be
derived. A county officer who receives funds shall deposit them with the
County Treasurer or his successor not later than the next regular business
day after the day on which the funds are received, but in no event shall
deposits be made later than seven business days after receipt of said funds
with [one] exception.’
Because any modifications to this language in the1987 codification of the Local Government Code
are nonsubstantive, Attorney General Opinion DM-396 construed “funds” in section 113.022 to
refer only to funds belonging to the county, even though section 113.022 does not explicitly limit
its scope in that way. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. DM-396 (1996) at 4-5.
While this office has opined that section 113.022 applies to funds “belonging to the county,”
we are not aware of any statute or judicial or attorney general opinion defining the term “belonging
to the county.” There are a number of attorney general opinions that consider whether particular
funds belong to the county. These opinions analyze the particular funds at issue and do not establish
any general rule. See, e.g., Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. Nos. DM-396 (1996) (hot check restitution collected
by sheriff does not belong to county), DM-257 (1993) (funds of specialized local entity belong to
county), JM-882 (1988) (Local Government Code chapter 117 trust funds do not belong to county);
Tex. Att’y Gen. LO-98-067 (justice of the peace defensive-driving-course fees belong to county),
LO-96-023 (Local Government Code chapter 117 trust funds do not belong to county). In Attorney
General Opinion DM-396, for example, this oftice concluded that a justice of the peace is not
required to deposit hot check restitution with the county treasurer because:
[rlestitution that a justice of the peace receives pursuant to section 32.41(e)
of the Penal Code merely passes “through” the court. The restitution clearly
does not belong to the county; rather, it belongs to the holder of the
dishonored check. Consequently, restitution received under section 32.41(e)
of the Penal Code is not “money belonging to a county”
Tex. Any Gen. Op. No. DM-396 (1996) at 4. As this opinion illustrates, whether funds “belong to
the county” depends very much on the nature of the particular monies at issue.
‘See Act of May 17, 1985,69th Leg., RX, ch. 145.5 1, 1985 Tex. Gen. Laws 669,669-70.
‘Id. (emphasis added).
‘See Act of May 1, 1987,7Oth Leg., R.S., ch. 149, caption, 1987 Tex. Gem Laws 707,707
Mr. John Branson - Page 3 (JC-0031)
In some cases, a statute may expressly provide that particular funds or a particular class of
funds collected by an officer belongs to the county and must be deposited in the county treasury.
Significantly, section 154.003 ofthe Local Government Code provides that “[a] district, county, or
precinct officer who is paid an annual salary shall charge and collect in the manner authorized by
law all fees, commissions, and other compensation permitted for official services performed by the
officer.” TEX. LOCALGOV’TCODEANN. § 154.003 (Vernon 1988). Section 154.003 also requires
that “[t]he officer dispose of the collected money as provided by” chapter 113, subchapter B,
sections 113.021 through 113.024. Id.4 Section 154.003 establishes that funds collected by a
salaried district, county, or precinct officer “for official services performed by the officer” belong
to the county and are subject to section 113.022. Thus, section 113.022 applies to a court fee
received by a district clerk that “belongs to the county,” including a fee for “official services”
performed by the district clerk.
We now turn to your question regarding court fees collected by the district clerk in your
county, who we assume receives a salary. You describe the following situation:
Court fees are collected and held in a separate account by the District
Clerk until the case is resolved before turning these funds over to the County
Treasurer. In some cases these funds are held for several years prior to the
transfer to the County Treasurer. .
It is the opinion of the District Clerk that she is to hold these funds until
the case is resolved before turning the funds over to the Treasurer and then
only under the order of the District Judge.
Letter from Mr. John Branson, Fisher County Auditor, to Honorable Dan Morales, Attorney General
(Aug. 10,199s) (on tile with Opinion Committee). Your questioninvolves a fee account maintained
by the district clerk outside of the county treasury. You do not ask about funds held in a court
registty account5 You believe that the monies at issue are subject to section 113.022 and should be
‘The Revisor’s Note to Local Government Code section 154.003 states as follows: “The source law refers to
the time at which and the fund in which collected money must be deposited. The references are omitted from revision
and a cross-reference to Subchapter B, Chapter 113, is added because that subchapter contains the provisions governing
the disposition of the money.” One of the two statutory predecessors to section 154.003, now-repealed aticle 3898,
provided that “officers receiving an annual salary as compensation for their services shall, by the close of each month,
pay into the Offkers’ Salary Fund or funds, all fees, commissions and compensation collected by him during said
month.” Act ofNov. 14, 1935.44t.b Leg., 2d C.S., ch. 465, 5 10, 1935 Tex. Gen. Laws 1762, 1767. We assume that
the revisors determined that the time-frame for deposit set forth in former article 3898, which dated from 1935, see id.,
had been superseded by the time-frame for deposit in the stahltory predecessor to Local Government Code section
113.022, now-repealed article 1709~7,which was enacted in 1985, see Act of May 17, 1985,69tb Leg., R.S., ch. 145,
9 1, 1985 Tex. Gen. Laws 669,669-70.
5F~ds deposited in court registry accounts under Local Government Code chapter 117 include funds tendered
(continued...)
Mr. John Branson - Page 4 (JC-0031)
deposited with the county treasurer upon receipt in accordance with those statutory time limits. On
the other hand, you have submitted a letter from the county attorney, who disagrees with your
position, stating that “as soon as the funds under her control become county funds, [the district clerk]
deposits them with the County Treasurer. [P]rior to that time, fhe funds in question are not county
fUnds and the handling of them is not governed by” section 113.022. See Letter from Honorable
Robie Robinson, Fisher County Attorney, to Mr. John Branson, Fisher County Auditor
(Aug. 7, 1998) (on file with Opinion Committee).
A myriad of statutes authorize district clerks to collect court fees in criminal6 and civil7 cases.
Some ofthese statutes earmark court fees for deposit in specific state or county accounts;* others are
silent with respect to this issue.’ Some of these fees are due when the service is perfonned;l” others
are collected as a court cost.” Generally, we believe that section 154.003 mandates that if a fee
provision is silent with respect to the fee’s proper disposition and the fee is for an official service
performed by the district clerk, then the fee must be deposited in the county treasury in accordance
with section 113.022 upon receipt. See TEX. LOCAL GGV’T CODE ANN. 4 154.003 (Vernon 1988)
(“A district. oficer who is paid an annual salary shall charge and collect in fhe manner authorized
by law all fees, commissions, and other compensation permitted for official services performed by
the officer. The officer shall dispose of the collected money as provided by Subchapter B, chapter
113.“); see also TEX. CONST. art. XVI, 5 61 (“All fees earned by district officers shall be paid
into the county treasury where earned for the account of the proper fund.“). Of course, an express
‘(...continued)
in an interpleader action, funds paid in satisfaction of ajudgment, child support funds, and cash bonds. See TEX. LOCAL
GOV’T CODEANN. 5 117.052 (Vernon Sups. 1999).
‘See TEX. CODE GRIM. PKJC. arts. 102.001- ,075 (Vernon Supp. 1999) (costs and fees paid by defendants in
criminal cases); TEX. Gov’~ CODEANN. 5 56.001 (Vernon 1998) (judicial and court personnel training fund fee).
‘S~~,~.~.,TEX.G~V’T CODEANN. $5 51.317(Vemon 1998)(filingfees); 51.318, 51.319(courtdocument
and services fees); 51.601 (court reporter fee); 51.604 (jury fee); 51.701 (judicial fund fee); 51.901(a)(2), (3) (legal
services fee); TEX. LOCAL GOV’T CODEANN. 3 291.008 (Vernon Supp. 1999) (co~rtl~ouse security fee).
8See, e.g., TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. $8 51.317(c) (Vernon 1998) (requiring district clerk to pay records
managementandpreservationfeetocountytreasurerfordepositinrecordsmanagementandprese~ationfund); 51.601
(requiring clerk to deliver court reporter fee to county treasurerfor deposit in court reporter service fund); 51.701(b)
(requiring district clerk to send judicial fund fees to the Comptroller for deposit in judicial fund); 51.901(a)(2), (d)
(requiring district clerk to send legal services fee to county treasurerwho must remit to Comptroller on quarterly basis);
TEX. LOCALGOV’T CODEANN. 5 291.008(e) (Vernon Supp. 1999) (district clerk to pay courthouse security fee to
county l~easurerfor deposit in courthouse security fund); TEX. CODECNM. PROC.ANN. art. 103.004(a) (Vernon Supp.
1998-99) (payments recovered in name of state payable to county treasurer).
gSee, e.g., TEX. Gov’r CODEANN. $5 51.317(a), (b)(l)-(3), .318, ,319 (Vernon 1998).
“See, e.g., id. $9 51.317, .318.
“See genern/[y Dallas County Y. Sweilzer, 881 S.W.2d 757 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1994, writ denied).
Mr. John Branson - Page 5 (JC-0031)
statutory directive regarding the deposit of a particular fee will prevail over more general statutes
regarding the disposition of monies.
Because we understand that you are particularly concerned about filing fees collected by the
district clerk, weapplythis generalrule to filingfeeprovisions. Sections 51.317,51.318, and 51.319
of the Government Code, for example, require the district clerk to collect various fees for services
performed by the clerk. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. $5 51.317-,319 (Vernon 1998). Generally,
these fees, which are expressly described in the statutes as fees for services performed by the district
clerk, must be deposited in the county treasury in accordance with section 113.022 upon receipt.
Subsection(c) of section 5 1.3 17, however, makes specific provision for the records management and
preservation fund fee set forth in subsection (b)(4), mandating the district clerk to pay that fee “to
the county treasurer . for deposit in the records management and preservation fund.” Id.
5 5 1.317(c). Accordingly, that fee must be deposited pursuant to that express statutory directive.
Finally, we note that county auditors have statutory authority to ensure that monies collected
by a district clerk that must be deposited in the county treasury are deposited in the county treasury.
Section 154.003 requires district officers to dispose of county money as provided by chapter 113,
subchapter B. S~~TEX.LOCALGOV’TCODEANN. $154.003 (Vernon 1988). SubchapterB requires
an officer to deposit money in accordance with procedures prescribed under section 112.001 or
112.002. See id. $ 113.021. Section 112.001, the provision applicable to your county,‘* authorizes
county auditors to adopt regulations “for the speedy and proper collecting, checking, and accounting
of the revenues and other funds and fees that belong to the county.” Id. 5 112.001. Any regulation
adopted by an auditor under section 112.001 must be consistent with the time limits established
under section 113.022. See id. (“county auditor may adopt and enforce regulations, not inconsistent
with law or with a rule adopted under Section 112.003 [by the Comptroller of Public Accounts]“)
(emphasis added). Section 112.001 does not authorize a county auditor to adopt regulations with
respect to funds and fees that do not belong to the county. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. Nos. DM-396
(1996) at 5, JM-1263 (1990) at 2.
In addition, a county auditor has the authority to determine whether a district clerk is properly
handling funds belonging to the county. Specifically, a county auditor is expressly authorized to
“examine the accounts, dockets, and records of each clerk. to determine if any money belonging
to the county and in the possession of the officer has not been accounted for and paid over according
to law.” TEX. LOCAL GOV’T CODE ANN. 5 115.901(a) (Vernon Supp. 1999); see also id.
$112.006(a) (Vernon 1988) (“The county auditor has general oversight of the books and records of
a county, district, or state officer authorized or required by law to receive or collect money or other
property that is intended for the use of the county or that belongs to the county.“); Tex. Att’y Gen.
Op. Nos. JM-702 (1987) (county auditor is authorized to audit inmate trust andjail commissary fund
‘2Local Government Code section 112.001 applies to a county with a population of less than 190,000, while
section 112.002 applies to a county with a population of 190,000 or more. Fisher County has a population of 4,842.
Bureau of the Census, U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, 1990 Census of Population: General Characteristics: Texas 2 (1992).
Mr. John Branson - Page 6 (X-0031)
held by sheriff whether or not monies belong to county), H-1185 (1978) (county auditor is
authorized to audit bond monies held by sheriffwhether or not monies belong to county), WW- 1400
(1962) (former article 1651, now Local Government Code section 112.006(a), authorized county
auditor to audit child support account books of district clerk). If a county auditor finds that such
money does exist, the auditor is required to report the findings of the examination to the
commissioners court “for the purpose of instituting a suit for the recovery of the money.” TEX.
LOCAL GOV’T CODE ANN. 5 115.901(b) (Vernon Supp. 1999).
In sum, section 113.022 of the Local Government Code applies to funds collected by a
district clerk that “belong to the county,” including all fees for “official services” performed by the
district clerk. An express statutory directive regarding the deposit of a particular fee will prevail
over more general statutes regarding the disposition of monies. As county auditor, you are
authorized to ensure that monies collected by a district clerk that must be deposited in the county
treasury are deposited in the treasury and to determine whether a district clerk is properly handling
funds belonging to the county.
We hope that this information is helpful. You or the county attorney may ask this office for
a supplemental attorney general opinion should legal questions arise about the proper disposition of
particular fees not addressed in this opinion. In addition, we note that the State Office of Court
Administration, which has prepared procedure manuals for district and court clerks, may be able to
assist your county in determining the proper disposition of particular fees collected by the district
clerk, as may the Comptroller.
Mr. John Branson - Page 7 (JC-0031)
SUMMARY
Section 113.022 ofthe Local Government Code applies to fimds collected
by a district clerk that “belong to the county,” including all fees for “official
services” performed by the district clerk. An express statutory directive
regarding the deposit of a particular fee will prevail over more general
statutes regarding the disposition of monies.
Yo s ve truly,
4J@Y-
JOtiN CORNYN
Attorney General of Texas
ANDY TAYLOR
First Assistant Attorney General
CLARK RENT ERVIN
Deputy Attorney General - General Counsel
ELIZABETH ROBINSON
Chair, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Mary R. Crouter
Assistant Attorney General