Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1990 )


Menu:
  •                         August 30, 1990
    Honorable Hugh Parmer         Opinion No.   JM-1213
    Chairman
    Intergovernmental Relations   Re: Authority of a municipal-
    Committee                  ity to require health benefit
    Texas State Senate            provisions to be included    in
    P. 0. Box 12068               specifications  for    contract
    Austin, Texas    78711        security guards    (RQ-1991)
    Dear Senator Parmer:
    You ask whether    the City of Houston     can authorize
    specifications   requiring   that the    city's    independent
    contractors   provide  their employees with basic       health
    insurance benefits.   We understand that the question relates
    specifically to independent   contractors providing   security
    guard services under contracts with the city.         We also
    understand that the city formerly employed its own security
    guards and has ceased the practice.      The city attorney's
    office has rendered its opinion on the matter and concluded
    that such a requirement would contravene competitive bidding
    requirements.   We agree.
    Chapter 252 of the Local Government Code is the law
    that governs city purchases.   With certain exceptions   that
    do not appear to be relevant here, that chapter     requires
    that cities with 50,000 or more inhabitants let contracts
    for amounts over $10,000 by means of competitive    bidding.
    Local Gov't Code 3 252.021(a).    We are advised   that the
    Houston city charter contains a complementary provision.
    Competitive bidding laws are designed    to ensure that
    the public   receives  "the  best work and materials   at the
    lowest practicable    price." v,                   
    240 S.W.2d 516
    , 520 (Tex. Civ. App. - Dallas 1951, no writ);    see also,
    a
    Texas Hi hwa     omm'n-v.                           Imnorters
    Inc.. 
    372 S.W.2d 525
    , 527 ITex. 19631. This end is achieved
    bydisallowance   of specifications that are unrelated to the
    quality or quantity of the goods or services          or that
    otherwise    restrict    competition.   In   Texas     Hishwav
    Commission, suvra, the court determined      that a highway
    commission minute order requiring that construction material
    P. 6418
    ,
    Honorable Hugh Parmer - Page 2     (JM-1213)
    used by the commission be domestically manufactured violated
    the competitive bidding statute. The court said "Matters of
    quality should be fixed by quality specifications and not by
    proscriptions as to localities of manufacture or fabrica-
    tion." 
    Id. at 529.
    By the same token, we believe that matters  of quality
    in the provision  of security guard services should not be
    fixed by requiring that contractors provide their employees
    with health  insurance benefits.    Such a requirement     may
    result in a work force that is less dependent on publicly
    supported health care, but it has no direct relation to the
    quality of security guard services.
    This office has noted that the legislature may alter
    the general competitive bidding rules by adopting exceptions
    or authorization that would otherwise contravene the mandate
    that goods and services be purchased through unrestricted
    competition.   Attorney General Opinion JM-712 (1987) (statu-
    tory exception   for out-of-state   bidders found in article
    601g, V.T.C.S.);   see also   Local Gov't Code 5 262.025(d)
    (authority for certain political subdivisions     to require
    that 25% of work be performed by bidder): Attorney    General
    Opinion JM-881   (1988) (requirement that 25% of work be
    performed by bidder's employees violates statute). We have
    found no similar exception      for a requirement  of health
    insurance benefits.
    It has been suggested that the city is a public health
    agency, and in that capacity, it has the authority to enact
    such an exception  to the competitive  bidding statute.   As
    this office noted in Attorney General Opinion JM-712 (1987),
    the state law may only be overcome by an exception   defined
    by the state legislature.
    SUMMARY
    The City of Houston may not require,
    either through an ordinance   or through  job
    specifications, that its contractors  provide
    their security guards with basic       health
    insurance benefits,.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    p. 6419
    Honorable Hugh Parmer - Page 3     (JM-1213)
    MARY KELLER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    LOU MCCREARY
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    RENEA HICKS
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Karen C. Gladney
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 6420
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-1213

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1990

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017