Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1985 )


Menu:
  •                                The Attorney        General of Texas
    December 18, 1985
    JIM MATTOX
    Attorney General
    Supreme Court Building         Mr. Vernon M. Arrell                OpinionNo. m-391
    P. 0. BOX 1254s
    Austin, TX. 78711. 2548
    Commissioner
    51214752501                    Texas RehabilitationCo~issiou       Re: Dispositionof income from
    Telex 9101874.1387             118 East Riverside‘Drive            RehabilitationCommissionvending
    Telecopier 5121475.0266        Austin. Texas 78704                 machines and pay telephones
    714 Jackson, Suite 700
    Dear Mr. Arrell:
    Dallas, TX. 75292-4506
    2141742.8944                        You have asked whether the Board of the Texas Rehabilitation
    Commission, acting as the board of trustees of au "Employee Fund"
    establishedfor the benefit of commissionemployees,may direct that
    4824 Alberta Ave., Suite 160
    El Paso. TX. 79905-2793
    income from vending machines and pay telephonesbe used to buy flowers
    9151533.3484                   either for hospitalizedemployeesor for the funeralsof employeesand
    their family mmhrs,     or be used for other purposes benefiting
    commission employc!esgenerally. You also ask whether these monies
    1001 Texas, Suite 700          must be deposited in the state treasury pursuant to the State Funds
    Houston, TX. 77002.3111
    Reform Act of 1981, now chapter4 of the TreasuryAct, article4393-1,
    713&x%5886
    V.T.C.S. -See Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 240, at 2078, 2103.
    806 Broadway, Suite 312             In order to answer your questions,it is unnecessaryto discuss
    Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479        at length by what:authority vending machines, pay telephones, and
    8061747.5238
    other coin-operateddevices may be installedin buildings occupiedby
    state agencies,because the commissionstherefrommay not be placed in
    4309 N. Tenth, Suite B         an "Employee Fund" such as you describe in any event; they must be
    ?&Allen, TX. 7awi-1885         depositedin the state treasuryunless they are paid to a vocationally
    512M2-4547                     handicappedvendor/operator.
    200 Main Plaza, Suite 400           If a "vending facility,"as defined by section 94.001(2),of the
    San Antonio, TX. 782052797     Human Resources Code, has been established in a state-controlled
    51212254191                    building by either the Commissionfor the Blind or the Rehabilitation
    Commissionpursuant to sections94.002, 94.003 and 94.007 [see, e.&,
    An Equal OpportunityI
    V.T.C.S. art. 8801 (coin-operatedservice, music, skill and pleasure
    Affirmative Action EmPlOw      machines)],the voszationally handicappedperson operatingthe facility
    is entitled to %e commissions from competing vending machines
    installedin the bu:tlding; but if the Commissionfor the Blind and the
    RehabilitationComn:Lssion have decided not to locate such a "vending
    facility," in a 'wilding, the agency issued a general permit to
    arrange for vending facilitiesis to determinethe "assignmentof the
    commissionsfrom lending machines installed in the building." Hum.
    Res. Code §94.OlO(c).
    p. 1790
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page 2    (34-391)
    Even if the Rehabilii:ation  Commission could be considered an
    agency "granted a general permit" to arrange for vending facilities
    and determine the assignment of commissions from vending machines
    installedin its buildingpursuant to section 94.010 [a questionwe do
    not address],we do not believe it could validly "assign" them to a
    fund operated for the private benefit of RehabilitationC=ission
    employees. While machine ccmrmissions may be assigned to handicapped
    vendors as part of the considerationfor their agreement to operate
    vending facilitieson the premises, money paid to a state agency by a
    vending company or other firm as considerationfor the placement of
    its machines on state property is money belonging to the state. It
    may not be used for private purposes. Texas Const. art. III, $51. In
    answer to your first question, we do not believe the use of public
    funds to purchase flowers ~1s:expressionsof condolencecould normally
    be considereda use for public purposes. Cf. AttorneyGeneral Opinion
    MW-36 (1979) (county prohib,ited from expending public funds for the
    purchase and mailing of Chri~stmascards).
    Your second question involves chapter 4 of article 4393-1,
    V.T.C.S.,the TreasuryAct, which embodiesthe State Funds Reform Act.
    It requires that "fees, fines, penalties, taxes, charges, gifts,
    grants, donations, and other funds collected or received by a state
    agency under law" shall be ;iepositedin the treasury,and creditedto
    the general revenue fund "unless the money is expresslyrequiredto be
    deposited in another fund, trust fund or special account not in the
    General Revenue Fund." 1r.T.C.S.art. 4393-1, 14.004. (Emphasis
    added).
    No law requires that the money collectedby the Rehabilitation
    Commission as commissions from vending.machines installed in its
    building be deposited in another fund, trust fund, or special fund,
    and it must be deposited in the general revenue fund of the state
    unless it is paid to a handicappedoperatorpursuant to chapter 94 of
    the Human ResourcesCode, or falls within one of the statutoryexemp-
    tions set out in section 4.003. You suggest the commissions from
    vending machines located ix the building occupied by the Rehabilita-
    tion Cosusissionmight be exemptedas "trust funds."
    Subsection (b)(2) of section 4.003 of article 4393-l specifies
    that the chapter does not c:pplyto "funds held in trust or escrow for
    the benefit of a person c'r entity other than a state agency." We
    think this provision would apply to the commissions collected from
    vending machines located i.nthe building housing the Rehabilitation
    Commission if they were being collected for the account of a
    handicappedvendor/operator,but not when they are collectedfor the
    benefit of a RehabilitationCommissionemployees fund. Cf. Attorney
    General Opinion MW-590 (1982) (physicians' fees at certain state
    hospitals not exempt from deposit in state treasury). Commissions
    collected for the benefit of handicappedvendors are earmarkedfunds
    p. 1791
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page:3    (JM-391)
    to which the vendors are already entitled as considerationfor their
    services,and are not collected for the benefit of the state agency.
    In other cases, machine comaissionswill be collectedfor the benefit
    of a state agency, which controls their disposition. Hum. Res. Code
    594.010. But see Hum. Res. Code 194.015(b).
    Our attentionhas bee3 drawn to Attorney General OpinionsMW-363
    (1981) and E-610 (1975), which involved a fund for the Windham
    Independent School District, a nongeographical school district
    operatedby the Texas Departmentof Correctionsfor the benefit of its
    inmates, and similar Educ;itional  and RecreationalFunds. The funds
    consisted of receipts frcm.the operation of commissaries,prison-
    sponsored recreational shows and entertainment,and all gifts and
    other income for inmate welfare. Attorney General Opinion H-610
    concludedthat the funds f.eldwere trust funds, and Attorney General
    Opinion MW-363 concluded zhat they were "held in trust" within the
    meaning of the State Funds Reform Act.
    It is unnecessaryhers to review or affirm all that was said in
    those opinions. It is sufficientto note that expendituresof money
    to advance the welfare of :.nmates
    by a state agency chargedwith their
    care is not an expenditure for private purposes; such expenditures
    serve a proper public purpose. Attorney General Opinions H-610 and
    MW-363 do not hold that public funds may be divertedto a fund for the
    private benefit of state ,employees.Cf. Hum. Res. Code 594.015(b);
    Attorney General Opinions N-454 (198r (certain Mental Health and
    Mental Retardation funds ncltsubject to deposit in state treasury);
    JM-42 (1983) (independent school districts may deposit "activity
    funds" in credit union).
    In sum, we are of the opinion that the income from neither
    vending machines,pay telephones,nor other coin-operateddevices,may
    be directedby the board of trustees of the RehabilitationCommission
    to be deposited in an "Employee Fund" to be used for the private
    benefit of RehabilitationCommission employees. Like income from
    vending machines, income from pay telephonesand other coin-operated
    devices placed on public property is public money. That the State
    Purchasingand General ServicesCommission,rather than the Commission
    for the Blind, may be responsiblefor authorizingthe placementof pay
    telephonesand other devices does not alter the public character of
    the income realized, *0* the constitutional restrictions on its
    disposition.
    Unless control has been specificallydelegated to a different
    agency by law, or unless the State Purchasing and General Services
    Cosraissionhas delegated the authorityto an occupying state agency,
    the State Purchasing and N:eneralServices Commissionhas charge and
    control of all public buildings, grounds, and property of the state.
    It is responsible for inc.omederived from the private use of such
    p. 1792
    .
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Pags:4   (n-l-391)
    property that it may achorize.       V.T.C.S. art. 601b, 594.01(a),
    4.01(c),4.15(a),4.15(b). Revenues it receives    from leasing space to
    private tenants in state-cwnedbuildings "to serve the needs of the
    employeesand visitors in the buildings"are requiredby statute to be
    deposited to the credit of'the general revenue fund and may be used
    only for "buildingand pror'erty servicesperformedby the Commission."
    V.T.C.S. art. 601h, 14.15(i). In our opinion the term "lease" in this
    statute was used in a broad sense that includes "licenses"and other
    Hancock V. Bradshaw, 
    350 S.W.2d 955
    (Tex. Civ.
    lesser rights. -See --
    APP. - Amarillo 1961, no writ) (coin-operatedmachines). See also
    Tips v. United States, 70 :?..2d
    525 (5th Cir. 1934) (federal"lease");
    Kibbin v. McPaddin, 259 Sik'.232 (Tex. Civ. App. - Beaumont 1924, writ
    ref'd) (nontechnicaluse of term). Cf. Doncliff Realty Corp. v.
    Miller, 
    225 A.2d 52
    (R.I. 1964) (statute)
    Thus, income from vending machines and pay telephoneslocated in
    the building occupied by the RehabilitationCommission-- because it
    is not expressly required by general law to be deposited in another
    fund, trust fund or special fund - must be deposited in the general
    revenue fund of the state pursuant to the State Funds Reform Act.
    V.T.C.S. art. 4393-l.
    We have not overlooked sections 36 and 37 of article V of the
    General AppropriationsAct, which reads:
    Sec. 36. VRNIYINGMACHINES ADTRORIZRD. Except
    in those areas which are now served by vendors
    operating under supervisionof the Blind Commls-
    SiOU,  vending machines may be placed on state-
    owned or leased property or in state-owned or
    leased buildings only with the approval of the
    governingboards or commissionsand such approval
    shall be recordei in the minutes of the body. A
    copy of the contractshall be filed with the State
    Purchasingand Q,n.eral ServicesCommissionshowing
    the location within the agency and the terms of
    the contract. Pxoceeds,net revenues,rentals or
    commissions received shall be accounted for as
    state revenue aad the amount so collected is
    hereby appropriated to the institution, board,
    commission or agency for use as directed by the
    board or commiss:ton authorizingthe installation.
    The amount of sutb proceeds,net revenues,rentals
    or commissionsar.ddisposalof such funds shall be
    included in the .nmnualreport of the state agency
    as required elsewhere in this Act. Vending
    machines located ,inareas or buildings now being
    serviced by vend,xcsunder the supervisionof the
    Blind Commission must be operated under a joint
    p. 1793
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page 5   (JM-391)
    I
    contract with the machine owners and the vendors
    operating under the supervision of the Blind
    Commission.
    Sec. 37.  PAY STATION TELEPHONES AUTRORIZD.
    Pay station telephones may be located in the
    capitol area only with the approval of the State
    Purchasingand Ggr.eralServicesCommissionand the
    net proceeds o:I such installations shall be
    collectedand dellositedto GeneralRevenue Fund by
    the State Purchasingand General Services Commis-
    sion. In other areas pay telephones may be
    located in state-(ownedor leased buildings or on
    state-owned land only with the approval of the
    governingboard or commissionand the net proceeds
    shall be collectsedand accounted for as state
    revsnue and the amount so collected is hereby
    appropriatedfor use by the agency as determined
    by the governingboard or commission. The amount
    of net proceeds and disposal of such funds shall
    be included in the annual report of the state
    agency as requiredelsewherein this Act.
    General AppropriationsAct!.Acts 1985, 69th Leg., art. V, 5536, 37. at
    7782-83.
    Riders to general appropriationsacts cannot repeal, modify,
    amand or conflictwith existing general law because such matters are
    foreign to the subject of "appropriations." Tex. Const. art. III,
    935; Moore v. Sheppard,19:!S.W.2d 559 (Tex. 1946). Riders that could
    be interpretedas intendirg to do so will be construed,instead, to
    harmonize with existing law, if possible. See Attorney General
    Opinion JM-343 (1985). ,iuthorityfor determining whether vending
    machines or other coin-,operateddevices will be installed on
    state-controlledproperty is vested by existing general law in the
    Commissionfor the Blind aud the State Purchasingand General Services
    Commission,primarily. Geaoral law also "earmarks"machine income in
    some instances,&,    directs its use for particularpurposes.
    Inasmuch as the AppropriationsAct provisionscannot alter that
    authority or appropriate the income for different purposes, we
    construethe two provisionsto mean, when they refer to "the board or
    commission authorizing the installation,"either the Commission for
    the Blind [or the Rehabilitation Commission pursuant to section
    94.003(b) of the Ruman Rr:sourcesCode] or the State Purchasing and
    General ServicesCommission[or the agency to which charge and control
    of the property may have hen given by statute or delegatedpursuant
    to article 601b, §4.01(c), V.T.C.S.]. Cf. Rum. Res. Code 094.004.
    Such a constructiondoes uo violence to the language employedby the
    p. 1794
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page 6   (34-391)
    legislaturein the AppropriationsAct riders and avoids the need to
    pronounce the passages violative of the constitution. See Jessen
    Associates,Inc. v. Bullock,,
    
    531 S.W.2d 593
    (Tex. 1975). -
    SUMMARY
    Income from vouding machines dispensingcertain
    products and services (not operated by handicapped
    vendors) and pay telephoneslocated in the building
    occupied by the Texas Rehabilitation Connission
    must be depositedIn the state treasuryand may not
    be expended for the private benefit of Texas
    RehabilitationCommisslan employees.
    Jabs
    Very truly yours,
    .
    JIM    MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    JACKRIGHTOWRR
    First AssistantAttorney General
    MARY KRLLER
    ExecutiveAssistantAttorney General
    ROBERT GRAY
    SpecialAssistantAttorney General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman,Opinion Committee
    Preparedby Bruce Youngblood
    AssistantAttorneyGeneral
    p. 1795
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-391

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017