Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1985 )


Menu:
  •                               The Attorney                       General        of Texas
    JIM MAl-TOX                                                 Oc:t,ober 18,   1985
    Attorney General
    suprrnw court sulidlwJ       Ur. Robert 0. Vitcrma                                    Opinion NO. JM-360
    P. 0. Box1254s               Executive Director                          ,
    Austin.TX. 78711-2542        Texas Comieaion on Jail                Stsodards         UC: Detention of pcrsoos in
    512/47w5o1                   P. 0. I)or 12985                                         county jail under articles 5115
    1u.x 91011)1*1s7
    1ekwpler SI21475ae8
    Austin.  Texae   78711                                   and X47-26, V.T.C.S.
    Dear   Mr.    Viterna:
    714Jackam.Sulta700
    0811*1,Tx. 752024506
    You request an opinion construing aevcrel ltetutee vith respect
    ZIu142am44
    to vbao a ~lptally  Hl person may be detained in the county    jail.    YOU
    first   aak whether article  5115. V.T.C.S.,   conflicta   with    lrticle
    4lt24Albwt4*w.suit*Iw        5547-26, V.T.C.S.  Article 5115 provides in part:
    Elkso,lx.7wos27w
    SIY53344M                                      The ~Cc~missiooers             Court    shall   provide  safe
    and    suitable  jails              for      their    respective
    1aJ11*rrr,Sul14700                          countlea. . . .
    Houuon. TX. 77002-5111
    712l2295Ba6                                     .   .   .    .
    SUITABLESISGREGATION
    es5 Bm4ow4y,sun~~I2
    Luotack,lx. 7Mo1-2472
    208l747-5238                                    The ten1 ‘ufe     cod suitable jails.'     as uwl in
    thie Act,    11hel1be constroed to mu       jells which
    : ~..                          provide c.r’deqaate    ugreytion     facilitiee    . 1 .
    U00N.TWth.SUtUB                              8epar8tS.q; ritoeeum    from all ela~sificatiow       of
    wcAltm.lx. 78sol-lam
    s12m2-4547    ..                             prim&i;      :and.ulem from feaaleo. . 1 .       '
    L: (:.;:~?,~~.
    . . . a
    200 MSh Plaza,Suit*400
    &nAntonlo,TX   -2727
    S1;e~l~;~~:suapectcd            of insenitr.    or ubo has
    51?J2254191
    m k dB&W           itmner @hall be houred or
    ~bold in:~>~ailv        except that e&h a person vbo
    :~. ~t~al~i.bafc'i&l~t~cllcieo.~a~                who awt be
    r~rtrdnetl     from    comittiug      act8 -of   violence
    againet oILbar parmona. uy be held in a iail for a
    period   of ,tlme mt to exceed l ~total of tventy-
    ,.i       .                    four.~24)~llhoura,:,duf~g      vhici; period be o&l1 be
    kept unde:~'obscrvetioa continuoumly. At the end
    of the twenty-four (24) hour period.          much Denon
    Shli be ri:lused or teken to a hornpita or uotal
    hospital.     Furthetmre. for ouch temporary holding
    p. 1645
    . .
    Mr. Robert 0. Viteras        - Psge i! (J?l-360)
    of each person swpected of inssnity. or who has
    been legslly   sdjl*lged insane, there   ehsll be
    provided [e padded cell].  (Emphseis sdded).
    The last parsgrsph quoted does not relate to the ordinsry county
    jell prisoner who hns been mrested for violating s criminnl law. IO
    our opinion it mesns thet s jell shall not be used to house persons
    solely on the ground that ,theysppeer to be insane or have been
    adjudged insana.     An axcq~tiw     is ude   for soy such person who
    “deuonstrates hoaicidel teodmcies” en4 has to be rertreinad from acts
    of violence sgainst others,, The requirements of article        5115 are
    npproprinte   for dealing vitll insure persons who are iocercernted for
    the purpose of restraining th,smfrom cowittiog    acts of violence; they
    aeke little    aeose vhen sp?:Lied to priroaers    lrrested on criminal
    cherges. since iocarceretiom asp last no wre thso 24 hours end aust
    be follwed by the iodividusl’s    release or hospits1ization.
    IO our opioioo. the qwted paragraph de~lr vith insane persons
    placed io jail      to reotraio (them~fraa acta of violeoca and oot with
    persons jailed      for criainal    charges.    Only the formar cetegory of
    persons are required by art:Lcla 5115 to be held in a padded cell.
    LOZNO V. With.         718 P.2d ‘756,..759 o. 6 (5th Cir. 1983) (diets)
    (article 5115 d-6 not reqwlte release or transfer of persons held on
    cricainal charges who are c:oiocideqtally insane);            contrs Wright v.
    Wagner, 
    641 P.2d 239
    (5th c:!lr. 1981) (dicta)         (article   5115 requires
    padded cell for prisoner         legally adjudged insane or suspected of
    1ns401ty).     The standards prescribed in article         5115 “are minImum
    stsndsrds only.”      The Taxes C&ssion       on Jail Stsoderds is smpovered
    to establish %inimn         stamdards for the construction,         equipment,
    asiotenaoce, and oparntion of .county jails”           and “for the cuntody.
    ~cara, aod treatment of -pri~ooars.*         V.T.C.S. art. 5115.1. )9(s)(l),
    (2).     The cowi~i+     ho -ratluirad that a jail have one or aore padded
    calls “foi.tamporary halding of rialaot persoos or parsuos suspected
    of   1nDNity.~      37 T.A.C. --Wig.66 -:<19gO). The ccnnission has in
    addition required aach l      htriff   to davalop a plan for classifying
    imnates, vhicb must prwido for
    [t]ha .raparate b~~iog    of persc+     suopectad of
    iosa+ity or tio.ht~a be&o lagally Cdjudged insane,
    :.      a@ .p+rsaor-%he . . ; krt        be restrained   from
    comittinJ   l.;aCtm roof ViOlSUN     againrt    other
    parsons. .~...
    37 T.A.C.      :271.2(g)      (1’jgO:s.        Thus.    aoy .violaot    prisoner. iosene
    primmer,.    or   prironar     .~auspBctod of          insanity” .wBt    be placed in e
    paddad cell.
    I.
    Article 5547-26; V.T.C.S..  was anactod as psrt of the 1983
    revirioo to the Taxas Xaotrl Health Cads. Actr 1983. 68th Leg., ch.
    p.    1646
    Mr. Robert 0. Viteroe        - Page '3 (a-360)
    47, at 211.  It la awog th#: Haotal Raalth Code prwirioos  easoded in
    1985 by Rouse Bill No. 1256. Aeta 1985. 69th Lag., ch. 70. nt 281.
    Articles  5547-26 through 5547-30, V.T.C.S..   prwide                 for the
    emergency detention of a patron believed to be mentnlly ill.                Article
    5547-26(a) prwidas ls follolrs:
    Aoy peace offic:er. vhe has remon             to believe
    aod does believe        upon the reprasentntion of A
    credible persoo, or upeo the basis of the conduct
    of a pereoa, or the circumstnocer under uhich the
    person is found, l:bmt the person IO uentslly ill
    lnd'because of ruclr mot.1           illness   represents A
    lubstnotial    risk I,:[ sarieuo hera to hfmself or
    othere uolaes imwdiataly rertrsinad. vhicb hnru
    uy     be  deaooetrctad       either     by the person’8
    behavior    or   by rvidenca of aavare             eaetiooal
    distress aod deter:;aratioo in his uental condition
    to the extent      that   the perooo caooot reusio at
    liberty,  sod who-believes there im not nufficieot
    time to obtain a vnrraot.              ray, uithaut first
    obtnioiog a warrant, take Ncb person into custody
    aod imediately          woosport      the person to the
    oaua8t     Spproprist~s in-pAtiNt            mento    health
    facility    and &al:1 fmuedintely file           lpplication
    vith the facility       Eor the pertwn'~ detention.        If
    facility    shall be kept eaparata from those parroor
    chuged     tith  or convicted of ~a~.crime. (Raphesis
    added).
    V.T.C.S. lr t.5547-26(n).   A '"aaotnl haalth authority" is the ngeocy
    desigoatad by the ccmiasiaoer     of the Texn~ Departnot       of Ueotnl
    Eenlth lnd Uaotnl Retardation to direct.oparate,      fncilitate  and/or
    coordinete sarviceo in the vrriour service nraas of the stnte.
    Article 5547-26(c),.V.T.C.S    ., requires a physicisn to ammine the
    person vitbio 24 hour6 of lpprehNrieo.          Uoless the physicleo asker,
    the nittN      ltataaent  raqufred by lrticla       5547-27 thnt emergency
    detNtioo    IO oecassnty,    the' person wet      be rclensed.    A perron
    nppreheodad under article    55M’-26 , asy be detnined PO longer than 24
    hours nftar ha IO presantad to the facility        unless he is takan into
    custody after noon eo Friday or 00 a Sbturdsy. Sun&y or legal
    Nr. Robert      0. Viterns - Pnge 4       (J&360)
    holiday. lo that came, the :I~Ihour detention period begins lt 9 0.0.
    on the firmtNccaading bu.1cul.s dny. V.T.C.S. lrt. 5547-26(f).
    The 1983 ravimioa of the Mental Eultb Code vam uodartakanportly
    in   rasponaato a, fedora1 court ruling thmt existing prwioions for
    detention in protective custody violntad due proce...     Dix, -1983
    Revision of ihe Tub.     Uentnl- Health Code, 16 St. Mary'. L.J. 41
    (1984); mea Luna v. Van ZantF554 P. Suvu. 681 (S.D. Tu.     1982). Lun.
    V. VN     1,
    i%ii   held thnt  tbe.mtntaamy mot ho.pitmlire no iodivi~
    plodlog a!n involuotnry civil. cdtment      hamring for more than three
    &ym u&e.a a neutrnlfactf:Lnder ukam a probnble csuse deteraiontion
    at A hemring tire   the potlent im present.
    Article 5547-26, V.T.C.S..  rats out in detnil circmstances thmt
    nuthorire the varrantlas.  dotantion of a aentally ill or apparently
    maotnlly ill person;   it 81~ indicntem   uban detention in A jail is
    permitted.   Article 5115 in oontrnst, priaerily   establishes require-
    aeot. for phymical conditioutr of a county jnil, but it refers     in on
    lmhiguoumand i~,oapleta vcby to the jailing of 4 mentblly ill or
    presuambly aentally ill pawm     vho dancmmtrntambaicidal     tendencies
    nnd aust be restraioad frolr hnraiog others.     Article 5115 does not
    stnte who la nuthorizad to ~?:Lnce  Nch A parson in jail,   nor who must
    tnka hia to a hompital or raL.ame hia at the Nd of 24 hours.     It does
    not stbte vhd ehall brraqge     for   the iodividual's  ndmission to A
    hoepitnl or untal hospital.
    NAN   thio prwision     wm rddad to article     5115 in 1957. it
    permitted a 7-&y detantion,. Acts 1957, 55th Leg.. eh. 277, lt 637.
    A 1975 enmctmentcraatad the Comimmion on Jail Standard. lnd mmeodad
    lrticle   5115 to reduce the detenti& to 24 hoarm. Actm 1975, 64th
    Leg.. ch. 480, at 1278. Article 5115. in our opinion, reflects       an
    early le8imlativa l   ffort~:to dul  with the urgency      deter&ion of
    parmonm&c-had n&t comitttrd      a criaa, but vhome mat81 illnams or
    appbraot laotal illnasm .utlo thea dan8erNs to others.       The period
    betveen 1957 mad 1983 ~%av:;B'significaat incruse in concern for the
    lag81 interests of involuntc.ry mental pbtients.  Dir, m      at 43.
    Article 555736 :raprasm~tm  tlu later nod lore datniled lagisln-
    rive lffott 20 prwida    for the eaergancy detention of mentally ill
    permons or permonm.rumonab1.y balievad~to be uotnlly ill..  It nppurs
    in A coaprmhanmivocoda.dasLgnad to prw1da~icea.m to humane care and
    treataent for permonm muffarlng from severeaentbl illoems.    V.T.C.S.
    art. -5547-2. Awq..othar    purposu. the code mats out to safegumrd
    X!dxr   i.vgS’+ aY&ts.   - ~3.3.%:ir.~   aft.   %t3VZiYz,.   is   our oplnlon,   lrtl&e
    5547-26 gwanii.     the aarSency    detanticm of parwns vhome amntal
    ill.namo reprueota    l mariournthrut.of hmn to tbeamelves or others,
    and-itorevails wer 8rticLi 5115 to the utmot of aw conflict.          See
    Stnta v: h&y.      404 8.U.2d :!96 (Tax. 1966); Pncific Pkoductm, Inc.7
    Grant WesternPlywood. Ltd,!, 528 S.U.2d 286 (Tu. Civ. App. - Fort
    p. 1648
    ?lr. Robert 0. Vitcrna - Page S    (Jh-360)
    Worth 1975, no vrit);   Robsrtmn v. State, 406 S.Y.Zd 90 (fex. Clv.
    APP. -  Fort  Worth   1966,-3,t  ref’d n.r.c.). The requirements 10
    article 5115 ao to a padded cell and other Jail cmditiono have not
    been impliadly repealed, but they are miaLur    ltandards which have
    baen aupplamted by rule of the Comieaion on Jail Standerda.
    Article    5547-26(a), V.T.C.S..     otatea th a t l 1jail   or similar
    detentlou     facility  shall  ‘not be deemed suitable         for   emergency
    detention except in au extrew emergency.         IOU ask vhat constitutes an
    “extreme emergency” under this    statute.
    Article 5547-26 requiruo thst even s person uho “represents a
    substantial   risk  of meriom    hara    to himself or other6    unless
    imediately   rxainad”    ahou1.d be taken to a mental health facility
    rather than to jail if at al:1 possible.   The 1985 amendmentto article
    5547-26 provides that  the pc’rson shall be traarportad to a facility
    deeaad suitable by the ment,r:Lhealth authority for the county if no
    appropriate in-patient manta1 haalth fscility   is available.
    What constitutes      an “extrame emergency” tbat would permit
    detention of the person la a :jail depends upon the facts of each case.
    Factors to be considered vou’ld include the tiinance       of the risk of
    harm,   the severity     of the harm threatenad.   and the availability
    of appropriate      mental health     facilities.   *      V.T.C.S.   art.
    5547-27(a) (l)-(4).     Cases ,ihich discuss the standard for actual
    cosaoltmant provide tome guidance.      For -la,      in Taylor v. State,
    671 S.W.id 535, 538 (Tax. App. - Eouston [lat Dist.] 1983. no urit).
    the court held that to comply with standards of due process required
    by the Texae and Federal Couotitution a person may not be deprived of
    hia liberty by a temporary involuntary comitment unless the ltate
    eatabliahes by clear and convincing evidanca that          there exists a
    aubatantlal threat of harm to himsalf or othara.       Moreover, the court
    stated tbat the “showing .auat       be found[adI upon actual dangerous
    behavior manifested by aoae wert act or threat in the recent past.”
    Article 5547-26 “~alloua an l.ndividual to ba, placed in jail vithout a
    magiatrate’m determination tbat ‘detention is necessary; therefore. the
    risk of haa that    invokes ltr procedures is graater and more Wdiate
    than that required under involuntary comitment          procedures.   -See
    V.T.C.S. arta. 5547~SO. 5541~,S1.
    You .aak whether    a pe::son tsken into. protective custody under
    article 5547-36, V.T.C.S..     q ny be detained in jail.   A Motion for an
    Order of Protective Custody suy be filed only in the court in which an
    Application    for Court-Ordsrad Mental Eulth        Services lo pending.
    V.T.C.S.   art.   5547-36(a).      The judge may ishue the order if     he
    detarm.inas                     ..
    p. 1649
    ttr. Robert 0. Vitarna - Page 6      (m-360)
    (1) that a phyr.ician haa etatad him opinion
    and the detaflad basis for his opinion that the
    paroon la sentally 01; and
    (2)    the perron proeanta  a lubetaotiel risk of
    lerioue  haa     to hfmself     or   othera  if   not
    immediately rartrain~ad   pending the hearing; ruch
    harm may be demonlrtreted either by the peraou’a
    behavior or by widtnca         of  savere emtional
    diatrasm and deteria~ration in him mental condition
    to the extent that the parson cannot remain at
    liberty.
    V.T.C.8. art. 5547-36(c).  k~ order of protective custody directa that
    the mentally ill person be cxken to “an appropriate in-patient mental
    bealth facility  or other suitable    place” and detained pending a
    probable cause hearing.   V.T.C.S. art. 5547-36(d).   Article 5547-39,
    V.T.C.8.. prwides for the place and term of dcteation     in protective
    clmtody:
    (a)  The head of a facility  in vhich a person
    is detained pursuant to an Order for Protective
    Cuatody or his dedgnae shall detain the perruo
    pending an Order ,for Court-Ordered Pfental Easlth
    Services issued ‘7nrsuant to Section  SO or 51 of
    this coda, exceptse provided in thir section.
    (b) The person detained in protective curtody
    lhall    detainr~d in an appropriate in-petient
    be
    mental health fircility .  If  there is no appro-
    priate in-patiart  mtal    health facility avail-
    able, the perrot shall be detained in a facility
    deeacd mitabla 'bytha untal health authority for
    extrens Getthe; e&gencias      daciarrd            to
    Subwction    (a)   of .~Section 38 of    this coda.
    Persona detained in a aonnedicdl facility    ahall be
    k a pl aparate firom those peraono charged uith or
    t
    convicted of a crima.
    (c)  Zf thtr parson is     datainad during en
    emergency In a. oonudical    facility,     the county
    health officer   shall tat  that    proper   care and
    madical attentLon are made evailable to the pernon
    p. 1650
    ?lr. Robert 0. Viterns - Page 1 (JH-360)
    held    in   protective   custody.   . . .   (Pkpharls
    added).
    Thue, article  5547-39 apraooly provides tbat a parson detained in
    protectivecustodymay be placed in a jail only in case of an extreme
    emergency and for no wre than, the tims period described in subsection
    &I.    As uith   an "extreme emergency”   under erticle 5547-26, m
    "extremeemergency” under 554,7-36 dependsupon the facts in escb case.
    Pou finallyask vhathar a.person chargedvith a crime may be bald
    in jail vhile a datarmiuatioli of his mantel capacity is msde pursuant
    to article 46.02 or articla M.03 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
    Article 46.02 of the l:oda provides for determining whether a
    dafendaot is competent to stand trial.          “A defendant Is presumed
    competent to stand trial and aball be found competent to stand trial
    unless proved incompetent b7, a preponderance of the evideoca."       Code
    Crlm. Proc.   art. 46.02,   61 lb). The Issue of competencymay arise
    before or during the trial ou the merits.      
    Id. 52. When
    this issue is
    raised, the court uy      appoi.nt experta  toxuine      the defendant and
    testify about his competency to stand trial.      
    Id. 13(a). If
    the court
    finds that there it evidence! to support a fiodiog of incompetency, a
    5ury la impaneled to decide ,this question. 
    Id. 14(a). Until
    the jury
    finds him incompetent   based on a prapooder=         of the evidence. the
    defendantla presumed compatmt under section l(b) of article 46.02 of
    the Code of Criminal Procedure.      Sea Graham v. State, 
    566 S.W.2d 941
     (Tex. Grim. App. 1978); -- Cross v. State.   
    446 S.W.2d 314
    (Tex. Grim.
    App. 1969).
    While the question of defendant's cowpetancyIs being determined,
    ha remains in custody pursuant to criminal charges.        Be has been
    detained because of theta charges, not because he appeared to be
    mentslly ill.  l'be terma of energancy detention and protective custody
    prescribed by lrticlao   5115, 5547-26. and 5547-39. V.T.C.S.,   do not
    apply to custody for crimiwl charges.
    A criminal defendant free on ball may be ordered to submit to a
    mental examination under lectlon 3(b) of article 46.02 of the Code of
    Criminal Procedure. If he refuses to, the court may order him into
    custody for examination "f,xra reasonable period not to exceed 21
    days."  Code Grim. Proc. art:. 46.02, 13(b).
    Article  46.03 of the Code of Criminal Procedure governs the
    Insanity dafenre, an lffiru~t:iva defense which defeodant muat raise in
    the trial on the merits and lprwe by a prepond&rance of the evidence.
    Code Crlm. Proc. art.      46.03; tee Penal Code 512.04, 8.01.       The
    defendant must also file notice This      intent to raise this defense
    before the trial.    Code Cria. Proc. art. 46.03. 12. The court ray
    order a defendant to sublsit to examination vith respect to the
    p. 1651
    Hr.   Robert 0. Vltarna - Page 8       (m-360)
    insanity dafenre.    If he is free on ball and refuaas      to eubmit to
    examination, the court uy ordlar him into custody for axaminatioo "for
    a reasonable period not to exceed 21 days."      Coda Grim. Prof.     art.
    46.03,  13(b).  Othenrisa, th#c defendant remalas in custody or free on
    bail, just as if ha had not rslaed the inaanity dafenae.      The Insanity
    defense conceras defendant's rwntal status when he cllttad       the crime
    and doas not necassarily in&ate       present mental illnaaa.     See Code
    Grim. Proc. art.      46.03, !Iri (procedures for determining whether
    defendant is mentally ill fo:L:Lou detarainationof not guilty by reason
    of iosanlty).   The prwiaionr for detaining lomaonein jail because he
    appears mentally ill   do not become applicable to a criminal defendant
    on trial merely because ha rs:Loed the Insanity defense.
    The provisions   lo article  5115. V.T.C.S.,    on
    holding.an apparer~tly insane person lo jell,    have
    been fmpliadly rapcaled to the extent of incon-
    sintancy by artt::Le 5547-26. V.T.C.S.        Article
    5547-39. V.T.C.S,,      prwider   the circumstancaa
    under which a person detained in protective
    custody pursuant   ta article  5547-36, V.T.C.S., may
    be held in jail.     A defendant in a criminal case
    remains a prisoner lo jail or free on bail while
    his   competency ‘to    stand trial    is  determined
    pursuant to artie:le 46.02 of the Coda of Criminal
    Procedure or xhile      the insanity defense under
    article 46.03 of'the Code of Criminal Procedure is
    decided in the tr:tal on the merits.
    Very I truly yours
    JIU        MATTOX
    Attorney    General of Texas
    TOMGRXRN
    Pirat Assistant Attorney    General
    DAVID It. BICBASDS
    gxacutive Assistant Attoraey     General         '
    .
    ROBERTGRAY
    Special Asslstsnt   Attorney.G~aneral
    p. 1652
    ’           ,
    -           .       nr. Robert 0. Vitarna   - Past 9   (Jn-360)
    ”       .
    Rx8 GILPIll
    Chairman. Opinion Cowittoe
    Preparad by Suaan L. Garrison
    Araiatant Attornay Ganaral
    APPBDVIZD:
    OPINIOII COMITTPZ
    Rick Gilpin,     Chairman
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrison
    Jim lloallingar
    Iaocy   Sutto8
    Sarah   Uoalk
    p. 1653
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-360

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017