Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1983 )


Menu:
  •            1
    The Attorney General of Texas
    March 14, 1983
    JIM MATTOX
    Attorney General
    Honorable Mike Driecoll                Opinion No. JM-11
    Supreme Court Bullding         Harris County Attorney
    P. 0. Box 12548                1001 Preston, Suite 634                Re: Fees to be collected
    Austin. TX. 78711. 2549
    Houston, Texas    77002                county   clerk    for   filing
    5121475-2501
    Telex 9101874~1387
    foreign judgment pursuant
    Telecopier   5121475~0206                                             article 2328b-5. V.T.C.S.
    Dear Mr. Driscoll:
    1607 Main St.. Suite 1400
    Dallas, TX. 75201-4709
    2141742.8944                        You have asked if the county clerk      of Harris County
    constitutionally authorized to collect the filing fee set forth
    article 2328b-5, V.T.C.S.
    4824 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160
    El Paso. TX. 798052793
    9151533.3484
    Article 2328b-5 is the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
    Act, enacted by the legislature in 1981. Generally, it provides that
    P
    a copy of any properly authenticated foreign judgment may be filed
    ,220 Dallas Ave.. Suite 202    the office of the clerk of any court of competent jurisdiction.
    Houston, TX. 770026986         statute directs the clerk to “treat the foreign judgment in the same
    7131650.0666
    manner as a judgment of the court in which the foreign judgment
    filed.” V.T.C.S. art. 2328b-5, 12.
    806 8roadway. Suite 312
    Lubbock. TX. 794013479              Section 5 of the act states:
    8061747.5238
    A person filing a foreign judgment shall pay $10
    4309 N. Tenth, Suite B
    to the clerk of the court.       Fees for other
    MeAllen, TX. 78501-1685                  enforcement proceedings shall be as otherwise
    5121682.4547                             provided by law for judgments of the courts of
    this state.
    200 Main Plaza, Suite 400
    San Antonio. TX. 78205-2797         You question the constitutionality of the statute because
    5121225.4191                   title of the measure enacting it did not refer to a fee nor to
    duty of the clerk to collect one. Article III, section 35 of
    Texas Constitution provides in part:
    An Equal Opportunity/
    Affirmative Action Employer
    Sec. 35. No bill . . . shall contain more than
    one subject, which shall be expressed in its
    title. But if any subject shall be embraced in an
    act, which shall not be expressed in the title,
    such act shall be void only as to so much thereof,
    as shall not be so expressed.
    Honorable Mike'Driscoll - Page 2 (J&11)
    YOU suggest that since the subject of fees was not expressed in the
    title, article 2328b-5, V.T.C.S., is void as to the provision
    regarding fees.
    In our opinion, the title of the bill in question is sufficient.
    It reads, "An Act relating to the uniform enforcement of foreign
    judgments." Acts 1981, 67th Leg., R.S., ch. 195. at 464. The filing
    of a foreign judgment is the first step necessary for enforcement of
    the judgment in this state. Indeed, after setting out the fee for
    filing a foreign judgment, the statute continues, "Fees for other
    enforcement proceedings shall be as otherwise provided by law for
    judgments of courts of this state." V.T.C.S. art. 2328b-5, 15. Thus,
    the fee provision relates to the enforcement of foreign judgments.
    At least since the Texas Supreme Court decided the case of &
    Hayman Construction Company v. American Indemnity Company, 
    471 S.W.2d 564
    (Tex. 1971). it has been the rule in this state that the caption
    of an act should be liberally construed so as to uphold its validity
    if at all possible. It is now settled that a statute will not be held
    to violate the constitutional provision if its own provisions relate
    directly or indirectly to the same general subject, have a mutual
    connection, and are not foreign to the subject expressed in the title.
    Robinson v. Hill, 507 S.W.Zd 521, 525 (Tex. 1974); City of Brownsville
    ?
    v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, 
    616 S.W.2d 402
    , 407 (Tex. Civ.
    APP. - Texarkana 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.).           See also Jessen
    Associates, Inc. v. Bullock, 
    531 S.W.2d 593
    , 601 (Tex. 1975). In our
    opinion, the fee provision of article 2328b-5 meets the test. Cf.
    Attorney General Opinion H-1097 (1977) (not necessary that the caption
    of an amendatory bill apprise the reader of the precise effects of the
    body of the bill, so long as the general subject of the amending bill
    is disclosed).
    You also ask, "What is the correct fee to be collected by the
    county clerk of Harris County, as clerk of the court at the time of
    filing a 'foreign judgment' as stated in article 2328b-5, V.T.C.S.?"
    The correct fee to be collected at that time for filing the foreign
    judgment is ten dollars ($10.00).
    You further ask if the clerk can thereafter collect several other
    fees related to litigation and to the enforcement of judgments, and if
    so, how much.
    The statute plainly provides that fees for other enforcement
    proceedings shall be as otherwise provided by law for judgments of the
    courts of this state. Article 3930(b). V.T.C.S., specifies in section
    1. subsection C, that where no cause is pending, the clerk shall
    charge $4.00 for issuing (and recording of the return thereon) each
    instrument or paper on which a return must be recorded. The mere
    filing of a foreign judgment does not initiate a suit or cause; thus,    ?
    p. 46
    -   .
    Honorable Mike Driscoll - Page 3   (JM-11)
    fees associated with the enforcement of foreign judgments will
    ordinarily be those "where no cause is pending." Of course, if a
    proceeding such as a garnishment action is instituted in connection
    therewith, then the fees to be charged "for each cause or action or
    docket" as specified by other provisions of article 3930b should be
    collected. It might also be noted that section (10) of article 3930,
    V.T.C.S.. requires county clerks to collect reasonable fees for the
    discharge of duties prescribed, authorized or permitted by the
    legislature for which no fee is statutorily set. See also Attorney
    General Opinion H-235 (1974). Cf. Attorney General Opinion MU-452
    (1982) (county clerk effecting service of citation by publication must
    charge same fees as the sheriff or constable is authorized to charge).
    Other fees about which you have asked are the sheriff's fee
    authorized by article 3926a, V.T.C.S., and the law library fee
    authorized by article 1702h. V.T.C.S. The law library "fee" is one
    "taxed, collected and paid as other costs" in civil cases. V.T.C.S.
    art. 1702h, 54. It is not to be collected where no case or suit has
    been initiated. Article 3926a, V.T.C.S.. allows the commissioners
    court of each county to set reasonable fees to be charged for services
    by the offices of sheriffs and constables. If fees have been properly
    established for the services of sheriffs in connection with the
    enforcement of judgments of the courts of this state, such fees may
    also be collected for services of sheriffs in connection with the
    enforcement of foreign judgments.
    SUMMARY
    The fee to be collected by a county clerk for
    filing a foreign judgment is $10. The title of
    the act establishing the fee is constitutionally
    sufficient for that purpose.      Fees for other
    enforcement   proceedings    respecting   foreign
    judgments are the same as those provided by law
    for the enforcement of judgments of the courts of
    this state.                      1
    L-l-J&
    -
    Very truly your ,
    JIM
    .
    MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    TOM GREEN
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    p. 47
    .   .
    HonorableMike Driscoll- Page 4   a-11)
    Preparedby Bruce Youngblood
    AssistantAttorneyGaneral
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison,Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpin
    George Gray
    Jim Moellinger
    Bruce Youngblood
    p. 48