Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1982 )


Menu:
  •     ..      *-a
    ..
    The Attorney          General of Texas
    January 28, 1982
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Bill Presnal                 Opinion No. WI-434
    Supreme Cawl Sulldlng
    P. 0. Sox 12548               Chairman
    Austin. TX. 78711             Committee on Appropriations            Re: Minimum salaries of fire-
    51214752501                   House of Representatives               men   under  article   1269q.
    Telex 910@74-1387             Austin, Texas   78769                  V.T.C.S.
    Telecopier 512f475JJ266
    Dear Representative Presnal:
    IS07 MaIn St.. suite 1400
    DalIa% TX. 75201                   You have sought our opinion with respect to the following
    21411428044                   question: Is a probationary firemen's trainee "a member of the fire
    department" within the meaning of article.1269q. V.T.C.S.. so as to be
    4S24.Afberla Ah, Suite 190
    entitled to minimum compensation as established under the statute?
    ElPaso.TX. 7OBC6
    W32M4S4                            Article 1269q provides that certain qualifying cities may submit
    a referendum to'its voters establishing minimum rates of compensation
    for its firemen and policemen. Pursuant to this statute the voters of
    1220Oallas
    Ave., Sulte
    202
    Houston,
    TX.77ow                the city of Victoria approved a minimum salary of $1,050.00 per month
    713m5oaSS                     for firemen.
    -Subsequent to the election, the city established a training and
    SOSsrmdwiy. Sum 312
    probationary program whereby a new employee in its fire department is
    Lubbock, TX. ~79401
    806/7476238                   required to finish a course of instruction at the city's firefighting
    academy in addition to completing one year of service with the
    department before the employee is paid the minimum salary established
    4202 N. Tenth, Suite S        by the voters. The issue presented is whether the city can withhold
    McAllal. TX. 18501
    5121(182-4547
    the minimum salary from an employee because he is a probationary
    non-certified fireman within the meaning of article 1269m, V.T.C.S..
    the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service'Act.
    MO MaIn Plaza, suite 400
    San Antonio, TX. 78205             Article 1269q. establishing minimum rates of pay, makes no
    512l225.4191
    reference to an employee's status as determined by article 1269m. but
    simply provides that the minimum salary as approved by the voters
    An Equal Opporlunllyl         shall be paid to "each member of the fire department." The operative
    Afflnnative ActIon Employec   language "each member of the fire department" finds no further
    elaboration in     the   statute and    has  never   been   construed
    authdritatively by Texas -courts.
    Bowever, in Attorney General Opinion 'O-4859 (1942) it was
    determined that "rookie policemen" and "jail matrons" were "members
    of" the police department within the meaning of article 1583 of the
    former Texas Penal Code, the predecessor to article 1269q. The
    ..                                                                                .
    -
    .
    .I
    Honorable Bill Presnal~- Page 2     (MW-434)
    opinion relied on a number of decisions from other jurisdictions that
    had construed the words "member of the department" in similar statutes
    to include all employees whether or not commissioned law enforcement
    officers.
    Also, in City of Wichita Falls v. Cox. 
    300 S.W.2d 317
    (Tex. Civ.
    APP. - Fort Worth 1957). the Court of Civil Appeals ruled that
    non-commissioned employees of a police department were "members of a
    police department" within the meaning of article 1269m and thus
    entitled to civil service protection under the statute. Subsequent to
    this opinion the legislature amended article 1269m to restrict its
    coverage to commissioned peace officers and firefighters and exclude
    all other department employees from civil service protection. See
    City of San Antonio v. Carr, 
    338 S.W.2d 122
    (Tex. 1960). It is-z
    some significance that the legislature did not, however, choose to
    amend former article 1583 of the Texas Penal Code [present article
    1269q1. It left intact the nearly identical language, "each member,"
    and one can reasonably infer therefrom that the legislature intended
    the minimum wage to cover all departmental employees while restricting
    civil service protection to firemen and policemen.
    Given the plain meaning of the words "each
    member". and the legislature's conduct in this
    matter, we reaffirm the opinion of this office on
    O-4859 (1942) and hold that, when a minimum wage
    is adopted pursuant to article 1269q. it must be
    applied to all employees of a police or fire
    department. Thus, in the instant case, it would
    be a violation of article 1269q not to pay
    probationary employees of the Victoria Fire
    Department the minimum amount set by the voters in
    the most recent referendum.
    Very truly yours,   'A
    MARK      WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER. JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICUARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    p. 1494
    Honorable Bill Presnal - Page 3   (Mw-434)
    Prepared by William 0. Goodman
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpin
    William 0. Goodman
    Jim Moellinger
    p. 1495
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-434

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1982

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017