Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1980 )


Menu:
  •                        The Attorney                General of Texas
    March     14,     1980
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Mr. Kenneth E. Graeber                        Opinion No.   m-147
    Executive Director
    School Tax Assessment Practices               Re: Assesment and collection of
    Board                                       state   ad valorem  tax     after
    3301 Northland Drive, Suite 500               January 1,198O.
    Austin, Texas 78731
    Dear Mr. Graeber:
    Under the provisions of the new Property Tax Code, your agency will
    become   the State Property Tax Board on January 1,198O. Property Tax Code
    S 8, Acts 1979, 66th Leg., ch. 841, at 2331 In this capacity it will be the
    state’s agent in the collection of the state ad valorem tax. Property Tax
    Code S 3LO9. Effective January 1, 1980, the assessment ratio for calculating
    taxes for state purposes will be .OOOlpercent. Property Tax Code S 26.03.
    Since the tax rate for state ad valorem purposes is 10 cents per $100 of
    valuation, the state ad valorem tax will yield only one dollar per every one
    billion dollars in property value on the county tax rolL This will generate
    less than $200 per year statewide, or on the average, less than one dollar per
    county. Yet the cost of administering this tax could exceed $l,OOO,OOO     per
    year. You inquire as to the responsibilities county tax assessors will have
    with regard to this tax starting next year when the .OOOl%assessment ratio
    becomes effective.
    All provisions of a code will be read together and harmonized if
    possible. Parshall v. State-, 
    138 S.W. 759
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1911). In construing
    legislation, the courts will not adopt a construction that will lead to absurd
    consequences.       Dovalina v. Albert, 
    409 S.W.2d 616
    (Tex. Civ. App. -
    Amarillo 1966, writ rePd n.r.e.1; City of Nacogdoches v. McLeroy, 
    371 S.W.2d 61
    (Tex. Civ. App. - Beaumont 1963, no writ).
    The legislature enacted provisions in the Property Tax Code which
    contemplate that the county tax assessor-collector  will collect the state ad
    valorem tax.      See Property Tax Code SS 31.03, 31.07(b). However, the
    legislature  also-&acted     the .OOOl% assessment ratio which makes it
    impossible to raise any revenue by collecting the tax, once the cost of
    collection is taken into consideration. Moreover, the tax would be virtually
    impossible to collect.   The amount collected from each taxpayer would in
    P.      470
    Mr. Kenneth E. Graeber       -   Page Two @9+‘-147)
    most cases be a small fraction of one cent. Once exemptions        are granted, -see Property
    Tax Code SS ll.ll - ll.26, many taxpayers would owe nothing.
    Section 31.07 contemplates that separate bills may be sent for the state and local
    taxes. Section 31.01(f) permits the governing body of a taxing unit to choose not to send a
    tax bill until the total amount of unpaid taxes is five dollars or more. We construe these
    provisions to authorize county tax assessors to defer sending separate bills for state ad
    valorem taxes until the total amount of unpaid taxes is five dollars or more. We believe
    this construction is necessary to render the provisions on state ad valorem tax workable.
    The State Property Tax Board is required to adopt rules prescribing methods of accounting
    for and remitting state property taxes. Property Tax Code S 31.09. We believe it can
    prescribe a procedure that authorizes the county tax assessol-collector     to defer assessing
    and collecting the state tax until it amounts to five dollars per unit of property.
    We also believe the board may authorize counties to advance to it each year the
    amount of uncollected state ad valorem tax for the county. Cf. Nassau County VI City of
    Lon Beach, 
    9 N.E.2d 50
    (N.Y. 1937) (statute made city liable to county for amount of
    --g-T.
    taxes certi led whether collected or not). We believe the countv mav reasonablv assume
    the small burden of paying less than cne dollar to the state in li’eu o? annually collecting
    that minute amount of tax at a far greater expenditure in collection costs. In this way the
    state will receive its ad valorem tax revenue and the counties will not have to collect it
    until the amount of revenue garnered will be more commensurate with collection costs.
    SUMMARY
    The State Property Tax Board may adopt a rule authorizing the
    county tax assessor-collector to defer assessing and collecting the
    state ad valorem tax until it amounts to five dollars per unit of
    property. The board may also authorize counties to advance to it
    annually the amount of uncollected state ad valorem tax for the
    county.
    -   MARK     WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    TED L. HARTLEY
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Susan Garrison
    Assistant Attorney General
    p.   471
    Mr. Kenneth E. Graeber      -   Page Three   (MW-147)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    C. Robert Heath, Chairman
    Bob Gammage
    Susan Garrison
    Rick Gilpin
    Myra McDaniel
    p.   472
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-147

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1980

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017