Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1978 )

The Attorney General of Texas December 29, 1978 Honorable Richard D. Latham Opinion No. H- 13 2 1 Securities Commissioner State Securities Board Re: Whether an amendment of a 709 Lyndon Baines Johnson Building limited partnership certificate re- Austin, Texas 707ll quires unanimous approval of all partners. Dear Commissioner Latham: Attorney General Opinion H-1229 (1978) indicates that the Texas Limited Partnership Act requires that partners in a limited partnership be unanimous in certain actions such as amending the partnership certificate. You ask if a unanimous vote of all members is required or if all members must merely sign any amendment to a certificate. Your question and our response are directed to the North American Securities Administrators Association voting rights discussed in Attorney General Opinion H-1229 (1978). The relevant language in Attorney General Opinion H-l229 was based on section 26 ‘of article 6132a, V.T.C.S., the Texas Uniform Limited Partnership Act. Section 26 provides in part: Sec. 26. (a) The writing to amend a certificate shalh (l) Conform to the requirements of Section 3(a)(l) as far as necessary to set forth clearly the change in the certificate which it is desired to make, and (2) Be signed and sworn to by all members, and an amendment substituting a limited partner or adding a limited or general partner shall be signed slso by the member to be substituted or added, and when a limited partner is to be substituted, the amendment shall also be signed by the assigning limited partner. (b) The writing to cancel a certificate shall be signed by all members. (c) A person desiring the cancellation or amendment of a certificate, if any person desig- nated in paragraphs (a) and (b) as a person who P. 5191 Honorable Richard D. Latham - Page 2 (H-1321) must execute the writing refuses to do so, may petition the district court of the judicial district wherein he resides, to direct a cancellation or amendment thereof. (d) If the court finds that the petitioner has a right to have the writing executed by a person who refuses to do so it shall order the Secretary of State to record the cancellation or amendment of the certificate; and where the certificate is to be amended, the court shall also cause to be filed for record in said office a certified copy of its decree setting forth the amendment. This statute clearly requires that any amendment of the certificate be signed and sworn to by all members. A limited partner often signs through his attorney in fact. Sec. 33. The Act does not, however, require that all members agree to any particular amendment of the partnership certificate. The Act provides that certain types of certificate amendments require unanimous action. See % sections 10(a)(5), 10(a)(6), 10(A)(?). Other provisions of the Act specifically requir~ancellation or amendment when certain non-unanimous action is taken. See e. sections 3(a)(l)(J); 20(d) and ZS(bX2); 3(a)(l)(K); lO(aX6) and 25(b)(3); 3(a)(l)(M); lm7 + ; 21(a) and 25(b)(5). Additionally, the Limited Partnership Act contemplates that amendment or cancellation of the certificate may be undertaken even though a member refuses to sign the amendment. Section 28(c) provides a means by which an individual may obtain a court order requiring an amendment or cancellation to be filed even though one or more partners refuse to sign. Thus, while all members of a limited partnership are required to sign any writing which would amend or cancel the certificate, a unanimous vote is not necessarily required to take such action. SUMMARY The amendment or cancellation of a limited partnership certificate &es not necessarily require a unanimous vote. Attorney General of Texas p. 5192 . . Honorable Richard D. Latham - Page 3 (H-1321) APPROVED: Opinion Committee . p. 5193