Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1978 )

The Attorney General of Texas October 11, 1978 JOHN L. HILL Attorney General able W. K. Harvey, Jr. Opinion No. H- 12 5 5 !ommissioner ‘exas Rehabilitation Commission Re: Authority of the Comptroller of 118 East Riverside Drive Public Accounts to implement a new Austin, Texas 78704 system of issuing warrants in payment of vouc.hers. Dear Mr. Harvey: You have asked our opinion on three questions relating to a new system which was ,recently implemented by the Comptroller for the payment of vouchers submitted to him by state agencies. Specifically you ask: Does the Comptroller have authority to refuse. to pay a claimant because the claim does not include a “Comptroller’s Sales Tax Permit Number” or a “Comptroller’s Vendor Number”? The procedure requires state agencies to submit a unique numerical identifier for each payee. This vendor identification number is based on the tax identification number used by that payee. It includes a social security number for individuals and a federal employer identification number for corporations and partnerships. The Comptroller informs us the system is designed to (1) assist in the enforcement of article 4350, V.T.C.S., which prohibits the issuance of warrants to persons indebted to the state, (2) permit more efficient and expeditious preparation of state warrants and (3) provide a data base to facilitate the assembly of financial and accounting information. A major category of persons indebted to the state includes individuals and corpor- ations who are delinquent in paying sales taxes due the state. The Comptroller has several relevant sources of statutory authority. Article 4344, V.T.C.S., provides in part: Among other duties the Comptroller shalh . . . . p. 4978 Honorable W. IS. Harvey, Jr. - Page 2 (R-1255) 3. Superintend the fiscal concerns of the State, as the sole accounting officer thereof, and manage the same in the manner required by law. 4. Require all accounts presented to him for settlement not otherwise provided for by law to be made on forms prescribed by him, all such accounts to be verified by affidavit as to their correctness, and he may administer the oath himself in any case in which he may deem it necessary. . . . . 10. Examine and settle the accounts of all persons indebted to the State and certify the amount or balance to the Treasurer, and direct and superintend, .the collection of all moneys due the State. lL Audit the claims of all persons against the State in cases where provision for the payment thereof has been made by law, unless the audit of any such claim is otherwise specially provided for. Article 4355, V.T.C.S., provides in part: AR claims and accounts against the State shall be submitted on forms prescribed by the Comptroller. Article 4344b, V.T.C.S., provides in part: (2) The Comptroller of Public Accounts is authorized to establish and operate a central electronic computing and data processing center to be used to maintain the central accounting records of the state, to prepare payrolls and other warrants, to audit tax reports, and to perform such other accounting and data processing activities as may be economically and practically adapted to the use of this equipment. In order to provide for the orderly and economical use of this equipment the Comptroller is further authorized to prescribe and revise claim forms, registers, warrants, and other documents submitted in support of payroll or other claims or to support tax or any other payments to the state. -See Attorney General Opinion H-245 (1974). We believe these statutes provide the Comptroller with adequate authority to require state agencies to include a vendor identification number on vouchers submitted to him for payment. p. 4979 1 ’ -. , Honorable W. K. Harvey, Jr. - Page 3 (H-12551 You also ask: Is this new system requiring the use of social security numbers as a universal identifier in violation of Section 7 of the Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579)? Section 7 of the Privacy Act (codified at 5 U.S.C. S 552a note) provides in part: (al(l) It shall be unlawful for any Federal, State or local government agency to deny to any individual any right, benefit, or privilege provided by law because of such individual’s refusal to disclose his social security account number. While section 7 arguably might prohibit the use of the social security number, it must be read in conjunction with section 1211 of the Tax Reform Act of 1976 (codified at 42 U.S.C. S 405(cX2XC)) which provides: (i) It is the policy of the United States that any State (or political subdivision thereof) may, in the administration of any tax, general public assistance, driver’s license, or motor vehicle registration law within its jurisdiction, utilize the social security account numbers issued by the Secretary for the purpose of establishing the identification of individuals affected by such law, and may require any individual who is or appears to be so affected to furnish to such State (or political subdivision thereof) or any agency thereof having administrative responsibility for the law involved, the social security account number (or numbers, if he has more than one such number) issued to him by the Secretary. (ii) If and to the extent that any provision of Federal law heretofore enacted is inconsistent with the policy set forth in clause (il of this subparagraph, such provision shall, on and after . . . [the date of the enactment of this subparagraph,] be null, void, and of no effect. Since the vendor identification number system is largely designed as a program of collection of delinquent taxes we believe it is covered by the exemption provided by section 1211. See Mayer, Privacy and the Social Security Number: Section 1211of the Tax Reform Act of 1976, 6 Rutgers Journal of Computers and the Law 221, 239-241 (1978); Privacy Protection Study Commission, Personal Privacy in an Information Society 613 (19’77); H.R. Rep. No. 658, 94th Cong., 2nd Sess., reprinted in 119761U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News 2897, 3821. p. 4980 .. . Honorable W. K. Harvey, Jr. - Page 4 (H-1255) Your final question is Does the Comptroller of Public Accounts have the authority to make a warrant payable to any other name or at any other address than the one shown on the face of the claim signed by the claimant and approved by the agency? The Comptroller’s duty is to insure that any warrant is issued to the correct person. Information you have furnished us suggests that the vendor identification number system is contrary to this aim, while information submitted by the Comptroller suggests the system promotes the aim. In either event, we believe the question raises administrative rather than legal issues and is accordingly inappropriate for consideration in the opinion process. We note, however, that the Comptroller’s brief indicates that he stands ready to issue a warrant to the name and address desired by the vendor when there is a dispute concerning the proper name. SUMMARY The Comptroller is authorized to require vouchers submitted to him by state agencies to include a vendor identification number. The Tax Reform Act of 1976 specifically permits the use of social security numbers in this type of vendor identification system. DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee jsn p. 4981