Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1978 )


Menu:
  •    The Attorney                 General of Texas
    June    5,    1978
    Honorable Ron Jackson                         Opinion No. H- 1172
    Executive Director
    Texas Youth Council                           Re: Payment   for return trans-
    8900 Shoal Creek Blvd.                        portation to Texas of juvenile
    Austin, Texas 78766                           runaways.
    Dear Mr. Jackson:
    You ask whether an appropriation    to the Texas Youth Council may be
    .     .
    used to pay travel expenses     incurred under Article IV of the Interstate
    Compact on Juveniles,    Family Code, chapter 25. The Executive Director of
    the Texas Youth Council serves as compact administrator      pursuant to section
    25.05 of the Family Code. Article IV of the Compact provides a procedure
    for returning a juvenile “who has not been adjudged delinquent       but who has
    run away. . . . ” Family Code 5 25.02, art. IV(a). Article IV(b) makes the state
    to which the juvenile is returned responsible     for payment of transportation
    costs. Section 25.07 of the Family Code provides as follows:
    The compact administrator      may make or arrange for
    the payments     necessary    to discharge   the financial
    obligations  imposed upon this state by the compact or
    by a supplementary      agreement   made under the com-
    pact, subject to legislative appropriations.
    You inform us that a nonadjudicated    juvenile runaway was recently
    taken into custody by South Carolina authorities.        The juvenile and her
    parents are residents of Texas. The compact administrator    generally requires
    the parents to pay the cost of the child’s return to Texas: however, in this
    case they could not afford to. The South Carolina compact administrator
    paid the costs of transportation and then requested    reimbursement    for this
    expense pursuant to article IV of the Compact.      You wish to know whether
    you may reimburse this travel expense from item 5d in the appropriation        to
    the Texas Youth Council.
    P.   4736
    Honorable     Ron Jackson         -   Page 2      (B-1172)
    5.        Community    Services:
    . . . .
    c. Residential    Contract Services
    d. Non-residential    Services
    e. Residential Services (Halfway      House Operation)
    . . . .
    General     Appropriation      Act, Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 872, at 2786.
    ln our opinion, the Compact provisions and section 25.07 provide preexisting
    law which would support            an appropriation      to pay the cost of returning          a
    nonadjudicated     runaway to Texas.       See Tex. Const. art. 3, § 44; Austin National
    Bank v. Sheppard,       
    71 S.W.2d 242
    (TX 1934); Attorney            General Opinion WW-340
    (1957). However, we do not believe you are authorized              to pay these transportation
    costs from the item for “[nlon-residential          services.”    Your budget request to the
    65th Legislature     stated that the expenditure       for nonresidential     services would aid
    the adjustment     of Texas Youth Council parolees.          Budget Estimates - Fiscal Years
    1978 and 1979 at 101. Like the items for residential                 services     with which the
    appropriation    groups the nonresidential      services item, it appears to be directed at
    persons already under the supervision of TYC. -See Attorney General Opinion H-822
    (1976). The TYC appropriation          specifically    authorizes    you to pay the costs of
    deporting nonresident      patients or students and returning Texas patients or students
    from other states.      General Appropriations      Act, Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 872, art.
    II, 5 2e, at 2798. These provisions apply to persons under state supervision and not
    to nonadjudicated     juveniles.   See Attorney General Opinion H-521 (1975).
    We find no indication       that the Legislature      intended   the nonresidential
    services item to be used to pay the cost of returning nonadjudicated           runaways: all
    indications    of legislative intent are to the contrary.     Since you have generally not
    paid such costs, we cannot draw any inferences            from legislative   acquiesence    in
    administrative     practice.  In our opinion, the proper course for South Carolina would
    be to seek reimbursement        under the Miscellaneous     Claims Act. -See V.T.C.S. art.
    4351b.
    SUMMARY
    The administrator       of the Interstate   Compact on Juveniles
    may not use the appropriation         to the Texas Youth Council
    for nonresidential      services to pay the cost of returning    a
    nonadjudicated     juvenile runaway to Texas.
    P.   4737
    Honorable   Ron Jackson   -   Page 3    (H-1172)
    Attorney   General   of Texas
    APPROVED:
    7iii4
    &y&?&d
    C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman
    Opinion Committee
    P.   4738
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-1172

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1978

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017