Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1978 )


Menu:
  •                r   .
    The Attorney                General       of Texas
    March 30, 1978
    JOHN L. HILL
    Attorney General
    Honorable John Wilson                         Opinion No. H- 114 7
    Chairman, Committee on
    Health & Welfare                            Re: Forfeiture       of   teacher
    House of Representatives                      retirement   benefits by county
    Austin, Texas 70769                           judge acting as ex officio super-
    intendent.
    Dear Representative   Wilson:
    You ask whether a county judge serving as ex officio county school
    superintendent pursuant to section 17.47 of the Education Code may at the
    same time receive teacher retirement benefits.       You inform us that the
    county judge of Fayette County is otherwise entitled to benefits from the
    Teacher Retirement System and ask whether section 3.37 of the Education
    Code requires him to forfeit these benefits. Section 3.37(d) provides in part:
    A person receiving a service retirement       benefit
    from the retirement system who is employed in any
    position in the public schools of Texas except as
    provided in this section, shall forfeit all retirement
    benefits for any month in which such employment
    occurs.
    The exception permits a limited amount of substitute teaching by a retired
    person. The county judge must forfeit his benefits if he “is employed in any
    position in the public schools” by reason of his ex officio service as county
    school superinteddent.
    ‘Public school” is defined by section 3.02(a)(2) of the Education Code as
    any educational institution or organization in this state
    which under the laws of Texas is entitled to be
    supported wholly or partly by state, county, school
    district, or other municipal corporation funds.
    This broad definition has been held to include Regional Education Media
    Centers established pursuant to section Il.32 of the Education Code to provide
    p.   4658
    Honorable John Wilson     -   Page 2        (H-1147)
    educational services for school districts.      See Attorney General Opinion C-749
    (1966). In our opinion, this definition of’“pub~schoo1”    is broad enough to include
    the county school administration,      which provides a variety of services to school
    districts and has authority to “perform any other act consistent with law for the
    promotion of education in the county.” Educ. Code S 17.31. The county school
    administration of course receives the requisite public funding. See Educ. Code SS
    17.09, 17.51, 17.52, 18.30. We believe the county judge who is periorming the duties
    of the county school superintendent is employed in a position in a public school so
    that section 3.37(d) requires him to forfeit his retirement        benefits.  To hold
    otherwise would reverse many years of consistent administrative interpretation    and
    would cause the disallowance of Teacher Retirement System credit earned by
    numerous individuals who served as county school personnel.               The Teacher
    Retirement System has come to the same conclusion with regard to this provision,
    and as the agency responsible for administering the statute its interpretation      is
    entitled to weight. .&e Attorney General Opinion H-671 (1976).
    You next ask whether the passage of Senate Bill 1327 by the 65th Legislature
    makes section 3.37(d) inapplicable to the county judge of Fayette County. Acts
    1977, 65th Leg., ch. 544. Senate Bill 1327 abolishes the board of county school
    trustees in Fayette County and provides that
    [il n serving as ex officio county school superintendent, the
    county judge of Fayette County shall perform the duties of
    that office without additional compensation.
    Sec. 2. In our opinion, Senate Bill 1327 is unconstitutional as a local law regulating
    the affairs of a county and the management of school districts. Tex. Const. art. 3,
    S 56. See Culberson County v. Holmes, 
    513 S.W.2d 126
    (Tex. Civ. App. - Rl Paso
    1974, no writ); Attorney General Opinions H-641, H-545 (1975); H-52 (1973).
    Consequently, Senate Bill 1327 is void and has no effect.
    SUMMARY
    A county judge serving as ex officio school superintendent is
    barred by section 3.37(d) of the Education Code from
    receiving teacher retirement    benefits during his service.
    Senate Bill 1327 enacted by the 65th Legislature is unconsti-
    tutional as a local law.
    ~-Wry     truly YOU=,
    p.     4659
    .    .
    Honorable John Wilson   -   Page 3        (H-1147)
    APPROVED:
    Opinion Committee
    jst
    p.     4660
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-1147

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1978

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017