Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1977 )


Menu:
  • Honorable Harvey Davis               Opinion No. H-1013
    Texas State Soil & Water
    Conservation Board                 Re: Deposit of Soil and
    Temple, Texas 76501                  Water Conservation District
    funds in interest-bearing
    accounts.
    Dear Mr. Davis:
    You have requested our opinion regarding whether a soil
    and water conservation district may deposit its funds in
    interest-bearing time accounts or purchase certificates of
    deposit at banks and savings and loan associations.
    Section 2 of article 165a-10, V.T.C.S., which deals with
    the "deposit and withdrawal of funds" of soil and water con-
    servation districts, provides:
    The Soil and Conservation Funds . . .
    appropriated to Conservation Districts
    shall be deposited in State or National
    Banks and shall be withdrawn upon ap-
    proval of the Board of Supervisors of
    a District by checks or orders signed
    by the Chairman and Secretary of the
    Board of Supervisors of the District.
    Although soil and water conservation districts are not sub-
    ject to most of the general statutes governing depositories,
    V.T.C.S. arts. 2525-2569, those statutes do provide a basis
    for defining "deposit" as used in article 165a-10, 9 2. They
    clearly employ the word "deposit" to mean both time and demand
    deposits, w,    arts. 2525, 2546. In Shaw v. McBre,    
    9 S.W.2d 410
    (Tex. Civ. App. -- Texarkana 1928)~ff"~~~
    -_~       S.W.Zd 121
    (Tex. Comm'n App. 1930, jdgmt adopted), the court, construing
    provisions regulating the banking industry, stated that the
    meaning of "depositors" in then-articles 475 and 475a, was as
    broad as "deposit" in then-article 523, defined therein to in-
    clude both demand and time deposits.  Shaw v. McBride, guxa
    at 411.
    P. 4183
    Honorable Harvey Davis - page 2    (H-1013)
    Furthermore, the courts of numerous other jurisdictions
    have held that the meaninq of "deposit" or "depositor" embraces
    both time and demand deposits. --L&nus Cotton Gin Co. v~.Walker.
    70 so. 754, 756 (Ala. 1916): _---
    Isenhartv * Monty, 423zEx,-
    837-38 (Coio. 1967); Bassett-.v West Haven Bank & Trust.o.,
    
    165 A. 895
    , 897 (Conn. 1933); Bennett .v.-'American Bax'& Trust
    co., 
    134 S.E. 781
    , 786 (Ga. 19m- ---McCormicZ.~ins~122-
    -_-
    N.E. 151, 154 (Ill. 19191: State ex rel.~ Carroll v. Corning
    State Savings Bank, 113 N;WT-500, 502(Iowa 1907); State ex
    rel. Davis v.                      
    201 N.W. 901
    904 (Neb. 1924) ;
    Jones v. O'Bri~~~~-~F~F"6~~;;59       (S. Dak. 1431). On the basis
    of these aluthorities. it is our-opinion that the command of sec-
    tion 2 of article 165a-10, that funds of soil and water conser-
    vation districts be "deposited" in state or national banks, would
    permit the deposit of such funds in interest-bearing time accounts.
    A "certificate of deposit," however, ordinarily signifies
    a deposit payable at some future date. In effect, it repre-
    sents the issuing bank's promissory note to the depositor.
    Thompson v. Thompson, 
    236 S.W.2d 779
    (Tex. 1951). A certificate
    of deposit is denominated an "investment" by article 6252-5a,
    V.T.C.S.  See -.
    _    First~National Bank in Grand Prairie v. Lone Star
    Life Insurance Co., 
    524 S.W.2d 525
    (Tex. CiviTpp. --mGr'
    writ ref'd n.r.e., 
    529 S.W.2d 67
    (Tex. 1975). We believe, there-
    fore,that   article 165a-10 does not authorize soil and water con-
    servation districts to purchase certificates of deposit.
    Neither article 165a-10 nor any other statute, permits
    the deposit of district funds in savings and loan associa-
    tions. In Attorney General Opinion H-723 (19751, we held
    that section 6.14 of article 852a, V.T.C.S., does not in it-
    self affirmatively authorize any political subdivision to
    place,its funds in a savings and loan association unless that
    political subdivis.ion is authorized to do so by other law.
    Since we are aware of no other law with regard to soil and
    water conservation districts, it is our opinion that such a
    district is not at present authorized to deposit its funds
    in a savings and loan association.
    SUMMARY
    --, ----
    A soil and water conservation district may
    deposit its funds in interest-bearing time
    accounts in a state or national bank, but it
    may not purchase certificates of deposit, nor
    may it deposit its funds in a savings and
    loan association.
    p. 4184
    Honorable Harvey Davis - page 3     (H-1013)
    Very truly yours,
    Attorney General of Texas
    AWROVED:
    Opinion Committee
    klw
    p. 4185