Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1973 )


Menu:
  •              THE         ATTORNEY              GENERAL
    OFTEXAS
    Arrsnnr.T~~~~        78711
    November 12, 1973
    The Honorable Joe Resweber.                            Opinion No. H-   146
    County Attorney
    Harris County Courthouse                               Re:   Is the County Clerk
    Houston, Texas 77002                                         required to record a
    certified copy of a
    Limited Partnership
    Certificate recorded
    in the office of the
    Secretary of State of
    Dear Mr.     Resweber:                                       Rhode Island?
    Your   opinion request advises that the County Clerk of Harris County
    was requested to file a certificate of limited partnership executed and filed
    in the State of Rhode Island under that state’s Uniform Limited Partnership
    Act.   The subject partnership expects to do business in Texas as a limited
    partnership, but does not plan to qualify with the Texas Secretary of State
    as a Texas Limited partnership.    Article 6132a, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes,
    The Uniform Limited Partnership Act.
    The county clerk desires an opinion as to whether he is required to
    record a certified copy of the certificate filed in Rhode Island.
    Article   6591, V. T. C.S.,    provides as follows:
    “County clerks shall be the recorders for their
    respective counties; they shall provide and keep in
    their offices well bound booka in which they shall record
    all instruments of writing authorized or required to be
    recorded in the county clerkls  office in the mannerhere-
    inafter provided. ”
    The instruments subject to recording are listed in various statutes   com-
    piled in Chapter 3 of Title 115, Articlea 6624 through 6646, V. T. C.S.    None of
    p. 687
    The Honorable Joe Resweber,      page 2     (H-146)
    these statutes authorizes   or requires the county clerk to record limited
    partnership agreements;
    No cases are directly in point, but the holdings of related cases
    militate against recording instruments not mentioned in these statutes. In
    Pegram v. Owens, 
    64 Tex. 475
    (1885), the Supreme Court construed an
    informal partnership dissolution agreement wherein Pegram first gave to
    Owens all claims belonging to the partnership.      The Supreme Court allowed
    the recording of the instrument because    of its last provision, but expressed
    doubt that the first provision alone would have been recordable.
    In Farmers and Merchants’ State Bank of Ranger vi Tullos, 
    211 S.W. 847
    (Tex. Civ. App., El Paso, 1919, no writ), the court stated that an assign-
    ment of lease money rentals is “not a deed, conveyance, or instrument con-
    cerning lands or tenements, wi thin the meaning of the registration statute. I’
    Even if the County Clerk did file the agreement, we doubt that its
    recording would constitute notice to the public of its contents or effect.
    Accordingly, we believe that the clerk     is not required to file the out-
    of-state limited partnership agreemht.
    SUMMARY
    The County Clerk of Harris County is not required
    to record a certified copy of a limited partnership agree-
    ment recorded in the office of the Secretary of State of
    another state.
    /\Very truly yours,
    u        Attorney General of Texas
    p. 688
    The Honorable Joe Resweber,   page 3   (H-146)
    APPRO,VED:
    I\
    DAVID M. KENDALL,     Chairman
    Opinion Committee          .,
    p. 689
    -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-146

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1973

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017