Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1969 )


Menu:
  •                  THE      AITTBRNEY            GENEECAL
    OP    a’lEXAS
    Col. Wilson E. Speir, Director               Opinion No..M~~07
    Texas Department   of Public Safety
    5805 North Lamar                             Rc:   Construction   pf S.Bb
    Austin, Texas    78751                             No. 743, Act6 616t
    WT. I R.S. 1969, re-
    lating to hours of
    operation   under &i
    occupational    drivers'
    Dear   Colonel   Speir:                        ..- license.
    You have requested   an opinion from this office concerning
    occupational   drivers'  licenses under the provision6   of'
    Senate Bill No. 743, Acts 616t Leg., R.S. ,1969, Chapter
    612, page 1821, and particularly     ask whether *the actual
    hours to be driven during each specific period of time
    must be definitely    set out so that an enforcement   officer
    examining   the license, which must contain the restrictions.,
    wi.11 know by looking at his watch whether the driver is
    violating   the terms of the order and license."
    your letter states that the department  ha6 received
    some orders wherein the restricted   hours of vehicle operation
    are Stated as "Any Ten (10) hour period between sunrise
    alId SUIlSet,' and "Any Ten (10) hour period between 7:30
    a.m. and 6:00 ~.rn.~* and that you can imagine other terms
    which would tend to allow flexible use of the permit by
    not stating definite   hours.
    Senate Bill 743 amends      Article 668713, Vernon's .Civil
    Statutes,   by adding Section     23A, pertinent ~portione-of.
    which read a6 follows:
    "(a)   Any person whose license has been
    suspended   for other than physical or mental
    disability   or impairment   may file'with   the
    judge of the district ~court having juris-
    diction with the.county     of hi6 residence,
    a verified petitiqn    setting forth in detail
    an essential   need for'operatinq    a motor
    vehicle in the performance     of his occupa-
    tion or trade, o 0 o In the event the judge
    enters the order findinq,an     easentiql~need,'
    ,-2430-
    COl.   Wilson   E. Speir,   Page   2,   (U-97   )
    a6 set out herein, he Shall also, as part
    of such finding, determine       the actual need
    of the petitioner    in operating    a motor
    vehicle in his occupation      or trade and
    shall restrict the use of the motor vehicle
    to the petitioner06     actual occupation    or
    trade and the right to drive to-and from
    the olace of emolovment      of the oetitioner.
    0   .'. Such res&i&ions      Shall b: definite
    as to the hOUr6 of the day0 days of the
    week, type of occupation      and areas or
    routes of travel to be permitted,       except
    that in any event the petitioner       shall
    not be allowed to operate a motor vehicle
    more than ten (10) hOUr6 in any twenty-
    four (24) consecutive     hours. o o o A
    certified   copy of the petition and the
    court order setting out the judge's find-
    ing and the restrictions      Shall ,be for-
    warded to the Department.
    "(b) Upon receipt of the court order
    set out in (a) above o o . , the Departmant
    shall issue an occupational~licen6e~     show-
    ing on its face the restrictions     set ZiFin
    the order of the court.
    "(c)  Any person who violates the res-
    trictions   on his OCcUpatiOnal    license shall
    be.quilty   of a misdemeanor    and upon wn-
    viction~thereof   shall be punished in the
    same manner a6 one convicted of driving
    a motor vehicle while lioense is suspended,.
    and 6uCh occupational     license Shall be
    automatically   cancelled."     (Emphasis added..);
    By enactment  of Senate Bill 743 the Legislature    created
    a new right or privilege   which is an exception   to the general
    laws relating to the operation    of a motor vehicle after.
    the suspension  of a drivers'   license.
    It is an established   mle   of wnstruction   that a'
    statute constituting    an exception  to a qeneral,law
    will be strictly   construed   and not extended by judicial
    construction.    53 Tex. Jur.:Zd   309, Statutes,  Sec. ,201.
    Moreover,  when a right i6 solely and exclu6ively   of
    Legislative   creation, and does,not derive existence'. ftbm
    Cal. Wilson   E. Speir,   Page   3, (u-507   )
    the common law or principles  of equity, and create6 a new
    riqht by statute, the wurts  will not extend the application
    of the statute, but will limit it6 application  to the .exact
    words of the act,  Johnson v, Darr, 
    114 Tex. 516
    , 272 S.W.'
    1098 (1925);
    ._
    Senate Bill 743 requires    that upon finding an essential
    need for an occupational    drivers' license the court "shall
    restrict the use of the motor vehicle,.     and that '[sluch 're-
    strictions   shall be definite as to the hours of the day,- o a. .?
    Webster'6 Third New International     Dictionary   define6
    definite as having distinct or certain limits:         determinat6
    1n extent or character:      limited, fixed:   marked by absence
    of the ambiguous,   obscure,   doubtful, or tentative ana by
    certain clear statement or expression     by means of flat
    positive assertion,   careful statement of limitation.
    &    is defined as one indifferently  out of more      than
    two : one or scune indiscriminately  or whatever kind;       we
    or another:   this, that or the other.
    Rence , an order restricting  the use of a motor vehicle
    to "any ten (10) hour period" between sunrise and sunset,
    etc., 16 indefinite   and does not comply with the Act which
    require6 that Such restrictions    "shall be definite" a6'to
    the hOUr6 of the day.
    In view of our analysis above, it is our opinion
    that the order of a court finding an essential need for
    an occupational   drivers'  license under the provisions    of
    Senate Bill 143 must set forth the actual hour6 to be
    driven during each specific period of time with such def-
    initeness  and certainty   that violations   of the restrictions
    may be determined   by reference   to a timepiece.   Therefore,
    we answer your question    in the affirmative.
    SUMMARY
    A court order finding an essential     need ~for
    an occupational   drivers' license under the pro-
    visions of S,B, 743, Acts 61st Leg,, R.S. l9fi9,
    Ch, 612, pa 1821 (Art. 6687b, Set, 23A, V.C.S.)
    must set forth the'actual    hours a motor vehicle
    may be driven'durinq    each specific period with
    such definiteness   and certainty   that violations
    of the restrictions    may be determined  by reference
    to a timepiece.
    -2432-
    Cal.    Wilson   E. Speir,   Page   4,    (M-507    )
    AttorBey       General   of Texas
    Prepared by Monroe      Clayton
    Assistant Attorney      General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    George Kelton, Vice-Chairman
    Thomas Sedberry
    Jack Sparks
    Malcom Smith
    Alan Minter
    MEADE    F. GRIFFIN
    staff    Legal Assistant
    NOLA WRITE
    First AsSiStant
    -2’t33-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-507

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1969

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017