Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1967 )


Menu:
  •                            $DIb- TRCXAS
    .~,,rrTns.
    ?a-Icx.\n
    fW7nII
    January 12, 1967
    Honorable Henry Wade              Opinion No. hi-6
    District Attorney
    Dallas, Texas                     Re: Whether under the stated
    facta, a contest known as
    "Let'8 Go To The Races"
    Dear Sir:                             constitutesa lottery?
    You have requested an opinion of thle office a8 to
    whether a conteat known as "Let'8 Go To The Racea", con-
    .   ducted under the following clrcumetanceaconstitutesa
    lottery:
    "An Individual presents hlmeelf at a
    certain business address and receives a card
    such as that enclosed and marked 'ExhibitA.’
    As stated on.the card, no purchase 1s neceesary
    to obtain such a,card. The individual then In
    accordance with the rules compares the numbere
    on hle card with numbers flashed upon a TV
    Bcreen or numbers poeted at the business address
    to ascertain the winner of amounts ranging from
    $5.00 to $1,000.00."
    We are In agreement with you that a contest conducted in
    accordancewith the aboye fact8 would not constitute a lottery
    within the meaning of Article 654, Vernon's Penal Code.
    In State v. Socony Mobil 011 Company, Inc., 
    386 S.W.2d 169
    ~(Tex. CI   A    lyb4          f        ) the Court held
    that a Lotte;; l~Po,,o,;de~T":hf~e'e:;~;~is~
    "(1) A prize or prizes; (2) the award or
    dletrlb.utlonof the prize or prizes by chance;
    (3) the payment either directly or indirectly
    by the partlclpants of the considerationfor the
    right or privilege of participating:"
    In mice V- State Of Texas, 
    156 Tex. Crim. 372
    , 
    242 S.W.2d 433
    , (1%1), the public was permitted to reglater for prizes
    - 20 -
    -1   _.
    Honorable Henry Wade, page 2 (M-6)
    to be glven away on a certain day; no charge was made for the
    privilege of registering; anyone could register; he was not
    required to be a customer; and no consideration was charged
    to be present at the drawing for the prize winners. The Court
    held that this was not a lottery In that the participants in
    the prize drawing did not pay, directly or lndlrectly, any
    consideration for participating in the drawing, a necessary
    element of a lottery. The Court of Civil Appeals In State of
    Texas v. Socony Mobil 011 
    Cornpane supra
    , cited the Brlce
    case with approval in holding thai the payment of a considera-
    tion, either directly or Indirectly, for the privilege of
    participating lnth2 contest Is an Indispensable element to
    constitute such a contest a lottery.
    SUMMARY
    The contest known as "Let's Go To The
    Races" conducted In accordance
    .       with the. facts
    _..          .
    stated, does not constrture a lortery m vio-
    latlon OS Article 654, V.P.C., In that no con-
    sideration was paid, directly or indirectly,
    by the partlclpants for the privilege of partl-
    cipating in the contest.
    RWN:lk
    Prepared by Robert W. Norris
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman
    W. V. Geppert, Co-Chairman
    ,,.._Tom Keever
    Thomas Mack
    Wade Anderson
    R. L. Lattlmore
    Staff Legal Assistant
    A. J. Carubbl, Jr.
    - 21 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-6

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1967

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017