Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1963 )


Menu:
  •                                          September 24, 1963
    .,7   ,,,,,.    %*y\   ,i,C>   wa.‘LQ-
    Honorable Jules Damianl, Jr.                        Opinion No. C- 147         j.
    Criminal District Attorney
    Galveston County                                    Re : Expirationdate of
    Galveston, Texas                                         current term of the
    Judge of the Court
    of DomesticRela-
    tions for Galveston
    Dear Sir:                                                countyl
    You have requested an opinion of this office as to
    the expirationdate of the current term of the Judge of the
    Court of Domestic Relations for Galveston County. S clfically,
    you ask whether the term expires on December 31, 196ee
    , or on
    December 31, 1966.
    The Court of Domestic Relations for GalvestonCounty
    Has created by Chapter 64, Acts of the 57th Ieglslature,Third
    Zalled Session (cod:fledas Article 2338-16 In Vernon's Civil
    Statutes), which took effect on September 1, 1962. Section 7
    of the original act provided In part as follows:
    "Sec. 7. The term of office of the Judge of said
    Court of Domestic Relations shall be for a period of
    four (4) years, the first full term to commence on
    January 1, 1965. Immediately upon the effective date
    of this Act, the Governor of the State of Texas shall
    appoint a suitable person as Judge of said Court, who
    shall hold office until the next general election and
    until his successor shall be duly elected and quali-
    fied. Thereafter, said Judge shall be elected as
    provided by the Constitution and l,"",s;$f
    the state for
    the election of District Judges.
    Under these provisions,the judge elected at the general
    electiotiIn 1962 would have received a term expiring on
    December 31, 1964, Andyan election for a full term of four
    years would be held In 1964. However, we are of the opinion
    that these provisionsof the statute are contrary to Article XVI,
    Section 65 of the Constitution of Texas and must give way to
    -712-
    Hon. Jules Damlanl, Jr., page 2 (C-147 )
    the constitutionalprovisions.
    The Court of Domestic Relations for Galveston County
    IS a court of county-wide jurisdiction. Section  30 of Article TJ
    of the Constitutionfixes the length of the full term of offIce
    for the judge of the court at four years, In the following
    language:
    "Sec. 30. The Judges of all Courts of county-wide
    jurisdictionheretofore or hereafter created by the
    Legislatureof this State * * * shall be elected
    for a term of four years, and shall serve until
    their successors have qualified."
    If this were the only provision In the Constitutionrelating
    to the term of this particular office, the judge elected at
    the general election In 1962 would have received a full term
    of four years beginning on the date fixed by Article 17 of
    the Revised Civil Statutes for commencement oftthe term, 1. e.,
    on Sanua   1 1963.   In Eades v. Drake 
    160 Tex. 381
    332 S.W.Z?d
    553 (1963,  ihe Supreme Court held thai, under'% p&isions of
    the Constitutionfixing the term of office.for district judges
    at four years, the judge elected at the first general election
    after creation of a new district courtsreceived a four-year
    term, although the statute creating the court provided that
    'theflrst'electlonshould be for a term of two years. .Howe+er,
    we are of the opinion that the holding In Eades v. Dra& Is
    not controllingas to the office of judge of a court of domestic
    relations,but rather that the length and expiration of the
    initial term Is governed by Article XVI, Sectlon 65 of the
    ConstI$utIon.
    Under Artlcie XVI, Section 65 of the Constitution,
    .provIdIngfor transition from two-year to four-year terms for
    'countyand,precinct officers, certain officers received four-
    year terms at the general election in 1954 and others received
    two-year terms. The section provides that following the
    expiratlon of these terms, all the officers sre to be elected
    for full four-year terms. In Attorney  General's Opinion No.
    W-1292 (1962), It was held that under this section  of the
    Constitution,which gave tax assessors-collectorsa two-year
    term In 1954, the electlon.of an assessor and collector of
    taxes for a four-year term occurs at the general elections
    of 1956, 1960, 1964, etc., and that If the separate office of
    assessor and collector of:taxes was created In a county under
    10,000 population by a special election held In May of 1962,
    the person elected to the office at the general election of
    1962 would not be elected for 8 full four-year term but would
    -713-
    Hon. Jules Damlanl, Jr., page 3 (C- 147 )
    be elected only for a term expiring on December 31, 1964.
    Among those officers receiving four-year terms at
    the 1954 general election were judges of county domestic
    relations courts. Thus, these officers are to be elected
    for four-year terms in 1958, 1962, 1966, and every four years
    thereafter. The provision In Section 7 of Article 2338-16
    for commencement of the first full term on January 1, 1965,
    was therefore unconstitutional. The invalidity In this
    section at the time of the 1962 general election did not
    Invalidate other provisions of the act, and the judge was
    elected for a term of four years as provided In the Constl-
    At Its regular session In 1963, the Legislature
    amended Section 7 of Article 2338-16 to read as follows
    (Acts 58th Leg., R.S. 1963, ch. 454, p. 1168):
    "Sec. 7. The term of office of the judge of
    said Court of Domestic Relations shall be for a
    period of four (4) years. Said judge shall be
    elected as provided by the Constitution and laws
    of the state for the election of judges of Courts
    of Domestic Relations. * l *I'
    zhe caption of the amendatory act states that the act Is
    amending the term of office of the judge of said court to
    correspond with the Constitution of the State of Texas."
    It thus appears that the purpose of the amendment of Section 7
    was to remove the Invalid provision making the first full
    term commence on January 1, 1965. The statute as amended Is
    now In harmony with the Constitution, and the present judge
    Is holding office under an election to a four-year term which
    will expire on December 31, 1966.
    SUMMARY
    At the general election of 1962, the Judge of
    the Court of Domestic Relations for Galveston County
    was elected to a four-year term which will expire
    -714-
    Hon. Jules Damlanl, Jr., page 4 (C-147   )
    on December 31, 1966.  Article XVI, Section 65
    of the Constitutionof Texas fixes the dates
    for elections for full terms of judges of county
    domestic relations courts as the years 1954,
    1958, 1962, and every four years thereafter, and
    a provision In the original act creating the Court
    of Domestic Relations for Galveston County which
    fixed January 1, 1965, as the date for commencement
    of the first full term was Invalid.
    Yours very truly,
    WAGGONER CARR
    Attorney General of Texas
    Assistant
    MKW:sJ
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Ben Harrison
    Edward Moffett     ..
    Polk Shelton
    Scott Garrison
    APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GE,NERAL
    BY: Stanton Stone
    -715-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-147

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1963

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017