Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1959 )


Menu:
  •                          February 6,. 1959
    Honorable Charles 3. Lieck, Jr.
    Criminal District Attorneys
    Bexar County
    San Antonio 5,~Texas
    Opinion No. WW-550
    Re: Whether the office of’Dis-
    trict Judge should be filled
    by appointmentor by special
    election under the stated
    Dear Mr. Lieck:                    faote.
    You have requested an opinion on the proper method
    for filling the offiae of District Judge under the,facts set
    out In the following letter addressed to you by the County Av-
    dltor of Bexar County:
    “Judge Raymond Gerhardt was re-elected
    In ‘theNovember, 1958 Qeneral Election, to
    the bench of the 45th Judicial District Court
    of Bexar County, Texas, to a ne* four year term,
    beginning January lst, 1959. However, Judge Qer-
    hardt passed away on December 3lst, 1958, be-
    fore.the start of the mew term to whloh he had
    been elected.
    “On January 5th, 1959, the Hon. Priae Daniel,
    Covernor of the State of Texas, appointed the
    Hon. Charles W. Barrow to fill the vacancy in the
    45th Judicial District Court. Judge Darrow took
    his oath oi’offlae on January 6th, 1959, at nhioh
    time he assumed the duties of Judge of the 45th
    Judlaial Distriat Court.
    “In view of the ?a& that one oi the County
    Judges of Bexar County made a publlt  statement
    that, in his opinion, the Qeveruor did not have
    the right to make the above appooiutment, but that
    a SpecialEleation should have been held to elect
    Hon. Charles J. Lleck, Jr., Page 2 (WW-5%)
    a judge to the 45th Judicial District Court,
    I would like for you to furnish me with an
    opinion as to the legality of the Qovernorls
    action in thia appointment.Please advise as
    to whether or not the Governor has the right
    to ~makcsuch'an appointmentor should a Special
    Election have been called to fill this vacancy.
    "I would appreciateyour prompt action In
    this matter, as I will be aempelled to hold up
    payment of Judge Barrow's salary as a member of
    the Juvenile Board."
    The questions which you present are:
    1. Under the circumstancesoutlined, was there a
    vacancy in the office of Judge of the 45th Dlstriot Court?
    2. If there was a vaaancy, should the vacancy be
    filled by appointmentby the Governor under the provisions of
    Artiale V, Section 28 of the Constitutionof Texas, or would
    he have to call a special election under the provisions of Ar-
    ticle 4.09 of the Eleation Code of the State of Texas?
    In the brief accompanyingyour request, you have
    expressed the opinion that the office was vaaant and would have
    to be filled by the Governor under the provisions of Article V,
    Section 28 of the Constitution.We agree with these conclusions.
    In support of our conclusion that there uas a va-
    cancy in the office we cite the folloulng authorities:State
    Cocke, 
    54 Tex. 462
    (1881); Maddox v. York, 
    54 S.W. 2Am
    .
    Clv.App. 1899, affirmed 
    93 Tex. 2
    '(> 55 S W 1137); TEE,;; Eep-
    er, 
    172 S.W. 721
    (Tex.Clv.App.19li, err&'ref. ; Do
    ate ex rel. Reece, 
    19 S.W.2d 574
    (Tex.Clv.App.1929).
    i-i-
    In answer to your second qua&ion, ue are of the
    opinion that the vaoancy was to be filled by appointment of
    the Governor rather than by a special election. Article V, Sec-
    tion 28 of the Constitutionprovides:
    "VacanciesIn the office of ,judgesof the
    Supreme Court, the Court of Criminal Appeals, the
    Court of Civil Appeals and the District Courts shall
    be filled by,the Qovernor until the next sucoeedlng
    General Election; . . ."
    This constitutionalprovision for appointmentby the Governor
    would control over a statute attempting to provide for a special
    election to fill the vacancy. However, we are of the opinion that
    Artlole A.09 of the Election Code does not purport to apply to
    Hon. Charles J. Lleck, Jr., Page 3 (WW-550)             2au
    the office of District Judge. It does not undertake to provide
    the rules for determiningwhether an office, ora vacancy in
    an office, Is to be filled by election; It .merelyprovldes the
    time and manner for ordering and holding the election where an
    election is required. Whether a particular offl.ce~lsto be
    filled by election mustbe Sound elsewhere in the law.
    Article 4.09, popularly called the "Qarner Amend-
    ment," was orIgInaLly enacted in 1933 to replace former Article
    2952 of the .RevlsedCivil Statutes. Upon the death or reslgna-
    tlon of an offloer-elect,the vacancy In the new term does not
    occur until the beginning of the term, and under the former law
    It had been held that an election to fill a vacancy could not
    be called until the vacancy actually occurred. The purpose of
    the amendment was to enable a special election to be ordered
    and held In ant~iclpatlonof a vacancy before the vacancy actual-
    ly occurred. In Sections 2 through 6, the statute sets out five
    different situations under which an election Is to be ordered
    immediately.Section 6 reads:
    "Section 6. Election on death of offlcer-
    an offlae which
    elect. When the offloer-elec.t'to~
    must be filled by election dies or becomes ln-
    eligible to qualify for the offlae to which he
    was elected, the proper officer shall lmmedlately
    order an election to elect a successor toestheln-
    cumbent of the offICe."
    Unlike Seations 2 through 5, this se&Ion refers to an "offise
    which must be filled by eleotion" rather than "anoffice a va-
    cancy In which" is to be or mu~stbe filled by election. Whether
    this variance In lsnguage was .lntentlonalor Inadvertent,the
    result Is the same as IS it had referred to a vacancy In-~
    office.
    There are some offices which must be filled by election; ex-
    amples of such offices being State Senator, State Representa-
    tive and United States Representative.There Is totally lacking
    any power to make an appointment to fill either of those of-
    fices. But where an offiae Is to be Sllled by appointmentupon
    the occurrence of a vacancy, It Is not an office whioh must be
    filled by election. This was the holding in Attorney qeneral's
    Opinions O-2965 (l*O), O-5093 (1943),~ and 0-6300 (1944). We
    conaur In these ,holdlngs.
    SUMMARY
    Where a Dlstrlot Judge who had been re-
    elected to a new term died before the beginning
    of the term, there was a vaaancy In the new
    term upon the commenoement~ofthe term. The va-
    cancy was to be fllled~by appointment by ~the
    Governor until the next general.electlon,under
    Hon. Charles 3. Lleck, Jr., page 4 (WW-550)
    Article V, Section 28 of the Constitution.
    Article 4;Og of the Election Code, relating
    to special elections to Sill vacancies, does
    not apply to the office of District Judge.
    Yours very   truly,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney Qeneral of Texas
    Assistant
    MKW:bh
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COIYHITTEE
    Oeo. P. Blackburn,,Chairman
    Charles D; Cablness
    Morgan Nesbltt    't
    REVIEWEDFORTHE ATTORNEYGENERAL
    BY:
    ,W.V.Qeppert
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-550

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1959

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017