Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1947 )


Menu:
  •          THSATTORNEYGENERZAL
    .;         OF TEXAS
    \                      Ootobsr   13, 1947
    1
    Hone ~BaSOcinGiles,        Chairman,      oplaion No,, v- 405
    School Lend Board
    Austin, Texas                             Re:   Constitutio&ility     oi
    Art. 921r, V;P.C.,    and
    related qusdtions aon-
    cqdng     Oily explora*
    tion work $n the mf
    of ,Mexioo*
    ..
    Dear Sir!
    “-. ,‘The Board hab requested our opinion on aavswl
    quretiohs Loonoejming ‘geophysioal    expl.orations within the
    ~SCate’s bt-+nd+‘ise’ iii the ‘~G4.f of Mexico, as ~followsr
    “l*  Is Artiole 92&, V, Pm c, pr@ibit-
    ~lng ‘the     02 dynatiits and explosives
    use                            -in tha
    waters 0i the St&&a, a’pplicable    tQ tha,~Qulf ’ .‘I ’
    of Idexioo, and 3.f~so, la th6 lrtatuta oonstl-.. ~.. :
    ~Dutlonal?      ~        .
    “2, Doss the Land Commissioner ol! ~tbe ’
    school Lana .Board 4~8 ‘authority to make ~. “~; 7
    ,rulea, -pertnit.ting anfl regulating geophysisal,    z_
    exploration    work ,on State lands wl~thin t-h& ‘2,’ in
    oulf   ~of-~yerlrol
    ., *&, :
    "34 IS the State ‘&nti,tled t0 OOmp8n-   22.
    aation for the rlvllega    of geophyaloal   ex-
    ploration  of GuPt lands c~onduoted by those
    who do not ‘halve leases thereon?W
    Your ftrst. question obviously relates ‘to Wood, supra
    ;
    It has tclen contended in briefs    filed with this
    M'Pice that the present exploration      work is in connection
    with oanstruotfonobsing    neabasay    in order for 011 opera-
    tors to know how ond where to build derricks,        sink piper
    and drill   for oil a2d other mlneraliu     HcwsverI as we
    understand the Saats. the use& of dynhmite in exploFatfons
    about whPah yotu inquire ar6 on landa not now under mineral
    lease freon the ditate-   The primary purpose of such woFk is
    to Qettrrlline what lands private conc6rns will seek to lease
    or bid upon wh6n sales are laad6.      ThereSoore 9 aeismio ex-
    plorations   by private concerns on ffulf lands not now held
    by them under lease cannot be rsaaonablg classified        as
    "neceaaary in constmoticn      work'" 60 as to c80!neviihln the
    exception contained In the etatute        Wltkk respect to such
    unleased lands.    It is unlawful   tc u&e dynsmlie ln the
    waters covering sam9
    ROIL    BSSCO~        Giles,     Page 7,       VL405c
    Obviously a different    rule applies to lands
    which have been leased or which may be leased hereafter
    from the State.        When the lessee in good faith decides
    he must determine how and where to construct a derrick,
    drilling     rig, etc.,   upon such lands and shows that use
    of dynamite is necessary in connection with such work,
    the County Judge of the proper County may permit such
    use under the previso in Article         92L, V. ,P, C. It is
    commonly known that detail work must be accomplished
    by exploratory       methods which sometimes require use of
    explosives      before a lessee.can   determine how and where
    to conduct actual construction        and development opera-
    tions on the lease he has purchased.          Any of such opera-
    tions reasonably necessary ia canneotion with good faith
    construction      work could be p0rdttea     by the County Judge
    of the County in which the submerged land is located.
    By the use of the terms "in any of the waters
    of the State" we believe the Legislature    fully intended
    that the placing of dynamite or mother explosives     in the
    waters of-the Gulf should be as unlavlful as in inland
    waters of the State.     In the prior Act the Legislature
    specifically    said:
    1,
    0   *   in any of the salt or fresh
    waters,'lakes             or streams in the State s s e1(
    In amending the Act, the l+&th Legislature
    rather than enumerate the various kinds of waters, sim-
    ply covered all waters by the term "in any waters of
    this State".    The Legislature  has in many other Acts
    recognized   its property rights in the submerged lands
    of the Gulf of Mexico,     With specific  reference  to fish
    and other aquatic animal life,    the Legislature   passed
    Article  4026, V. C, s,, which among other things, pro-
    vided:
    *All of the publia rivers,  bayous,
    lagoons,  creeks, lakes, bays and inlets
    in this State, and all that part of the
    Gulf of Mexico within the jurisdiction
    of this State, together with their beds
    and bottoms, and all of the products
    thereof,  shall continue and remain the
    property of the State of Texas, except
    in so far as the State shall permit the
    use of said waters and bottoms, or per-
    nit the taking of the products of such
    bottoms or waters, and in so far as this
    .
    Hon. B8soom Giles,     Page 8,    V- .405*
    use shell relate to or affeot the taking
    and conservation       of fish,   oysters,   shrimp,
    crabs,    clams s turtle,   terrapin,   musselsp
    lobsters,      and all other kinds and forms of
    marine life,      e 0 -If
    :s
    %A view of this Act, it is manifest that by the use of
    the terms "in any of the waters of this State" the Leg-
    ielsture      intended that the waters of the Gulf or ~exioo
    ever which the State has jurisdiction              be included there-
    in.     Those waters and the lands thereunder are just as
    moh a part of the State of Texas as the Capitol grounds,
    and bUV0 b&an since 1836 when the Cowress of the Repub-
    110 ffrst       bet the boundaries of Texas three merinr leagues
    irem ahore in the Gulf of Merioa.              The salt water rrrarinr
    Itie rit?l&a those water8 era just brr much the property of
    fke ': aoe es fresh watrr bass or perch.              The Legislature
    inte 3 'ed in Article       92.4 to proteot the salt water fish
    just BP mUoh as the fresh water fish.
    dur second question e concerning the euthor-
    iby sf the Lana Commissioner or School Land Board to
    Per&t aad regulate exploration     work on the lends In
    que@tien, should be considered first with respect to
    laa$ect leads.   It is iclear that an oil and gas lease
    &ld to the. highest bidder by the School Land Board,
    u.ndnr:the paovisfons   or Articls 5421~~ as amended,
    cer&euith,it     the ri&ht to make geophysical    explora-
    b&oae 88 well a8 other explcmtions     end development for
    oil and gas onthe leased property.       No rurther permit
    18 nece$sery ror such operations    so long as they do not
    eonfliat   with other laws, suoh aa Article   92L, Vc P, C,
    It is also clear that the Land Commissioner,
    with   respect   to leased landsI may make rules and regu-
    lotions    asneerning the exploration    and other operations
    ewQaet,ea on submerged lands, so long as they do not oon-
    fliot   with Legislative   Aote,  Arti.cle 5366, V, C- SC,
    carried forward by reference     in Article 51,21c-5, V:C,S.,
    provides:
    ‘“The development of wells and the de-
    velopment and operation upon the areas in-
    cluded herein shall be done so far as pract-
    icable in such manner as to prevent Such
    pollution   of the water as will destroy fish,
    oysters and other sea food,     The Game, Fish
    and Oyster Commissioner shall enforce such
    rules aa the Commissioner of the General
    Land office   may prescribe for that purposei"
    Hon. Bsscom Gilea,   Page 9,   V-40g0
    Therefore,    as to leased land, the Commissioner
    of the Goneral Land Office may make rules and regulations
    which restrict    seismic operations so as to eliminste      many
    of the practices     injurious   to the marine life of the Gulf.
    Any rules aa to use of:dynamite and explosives         must be
    subject to Article      924., V. P. C., which means that the
    lessee may use the same on the leased property only when
    necessary in connection with construction         work, and after
    obtaining a permit from the-County Judge as provided there-
    In order to properly protect fish and marine life        in
    iF;rations   under such a permit      the County Judge should
    grant 8-e    under the condition'that      the lessee will abide
    by the rules and regulations       made by the Land Commissioner
    regarding use or explosives       on State leases.
    As to unleased Gulf lands, it is our opinion
    that the Land Commissioner and the School Land Board have
    no authority   to grant a permit or make rules which would
    permitcnd    regulate geophysical   explorations   thereon.
    When a private concern enters upon public school lands,
    whether upland or submerged, and makes geophysical        sur-
    veys, which revealto     some extent the possibilities      of
    the land producing oil, a valuable right has been enjoy-
    ed and valuable information    has b.een gained,    Aronow v.
    Bishop, lo?M&t.      317, 86 P. (2) ~644;-Ohio Oil Co. v.
    Sharp, 
    135 F. 12
    .) 303*
    The scientific    information   obtained by geo-
    physical methods is itsalr      a valuable property right,
    . and private landowners usually receive compensation for
    the valuable privilege    given a private concern to ob-
    tain.such  inf’ormation.   Layne La, Co, v, Superio.: Oil
    co., 209 IA, 1014, 26 So. (2) 206
    Such geophysical    rights are an incident   of
    the miners1 atvtata, and this, in Gulf lands, has bean
    set apart to the Public School Fund. Their sale or dis-
    position is, therefore,    within the exclusive   province
    of the Legislature,   and aan ‘never be given away. Arm-
    strong v. Walker, 73 S.,H. (2) 520,
    Any lease or sale of rights in those State
    l&as which are held in trust for the whole people, as
    is the bed of the sea! must be expressly authorized    by
    the Legislature,    Lormo v. Crawrord Packing Co., 142
    Tax. 51, 175 S. W. (2) 410. Grayburg Oil Co, v. Giles,
    
    143 Tex. 490
    , 186 S, i/c (21 680; Dolan v, i'lalker, 
    121 Tex. 361
    , 49 S. W, (2) 695; Landry v, Robison, 
    110 Tex. 295
    , 219 S. w. 817; DeMeritt v, Robison, 102 Tex= 358,
    116 8. w. 7960
    Han, Bascom Giles,    Page 10,   V-405,
    The Legislature     has authorized the &rant of such
    valuable rights with respeat to oil and gas only as an in-
    aident to oil ana gas exploration       ana development under
    leases,   for which the purchaser must pay the highest bid,
    There is no other authority under which the School Land
    Board or Commissioner may permit the gathering of thia
    valuable iarormation,        This has been the consistent   hold-
    ing of this office      under this and past administrations~
    Opinion No. O-1172, September 15- 1939. made the same de-
    termination with respeat to Texas Prison lands, and a sub-
    Sequent LsgisUtture passed s statute acthorizing         such ex-
    ploration   permits On Prison lands for a valuable consid-
    eration.    Article   6203aa, V: C, S-
    For the same reasons9 you would not have the au-
    thority to WI&~ rules and regulations  which would permit
    such exploration  on unleased Gulf lands,
    We realize    that It would be of great advantage
    to the School Pund in much higher bonus payments for leases
    if permits could be made (vrith 6d6qUEit6       compensation) for
    the continuation   of geophysical     exploration   of Gulf lands,
    We also realize    that enforcement of our laws on this sub-
    &et will hereafter     restrict    Gulf exploration   work to
    ~,smQs now leased or which will be leased at the next sale
    on November I.     However, under our system of Government,
    we must operate in accordance wlth the law until the Leg-
    i,,eloture changesthe    law,    All of these matters are with-
    in the proviaae or the Legislaturec          The School Lana Board
    toresew the need for a new law on this subject betora the
    50th Legislature    convened and recommended the passage or
    a Bill which would allow exploration         permits after pay-
    smnt or due compensation therefore,          The Legislature   did
    at see fit to Provide such Ed Aat, and the proposal
    9&ouse Bill 50) died in oomaittee.
    Our answer to your second question partially
    answers your thire inquiry, whether private concerns owe
    the State compensation for information already gained
    without a permit or lease on Gulf lands+     It is our opin-
    ion thet the Stats is justly due compensation in the form
    of damages for the reasonable value of the privilege     ex-
    ercised by those companies which have alreaay explored
    the land8 without leases thereon,     It is air view that
    the &ate,   far the Public School Fund. has the aame cause
    of action in this regard as a private owner VJhOS6land
    has been explored geophyaicollg   prithout permission-   In
    this connection see Layne La: Co v Superior Oil Co ;
    -   .
    .   .,
    
    209 La. 1014
    ,       26 So, (2) 20; Angelloz vr Humble 011 Oo.,
    196 x.a, 604,      
    199 So. 656
    ; and Shell v. Scullg (C,C.A. ,La.) ,
    71 fed.      (2) 772. With your approval,       this    orrioe   will   in-
    atituta      proceedings r0r such recovery.
    SUbWRY
    1. Articls    924, V. P. C., prohibiting
    the usa 0r dynamitr in the watera 0r Texas,
    except ror conatruotion      purposes, applies to
    the waters or the mar       0r Mexioo   within the
    State’s   boundaries,   and is oonatltutional.
    The uaa or explorlvss     in coahrption with
    geophysical   sxplo~t~iona    in such watrr8 0r
    ths Gull   ie unlawful,   except on lands lsasad
    rrom the State and then only in aacordancs
    with the exception In Article        924 when MO-
    sssary in oonneotion with construotioa        work
    ‘on said leases.
    2.   Thr Land Comnleaioner has authority
    to make rules and regulations       for explora-
    tion work only on leaeed lands, and then eub-
    j%ot to Article    9241 V. P. C. There is no
    authority    for granting a permit or mak%u
    rules which would permit and rsgulats such
    explorations    on unlearned lands.
    3* Private oonoorm which have obtain-
    ed geophyeioal iniormatlon on odr lands
    without permit or lease are liable to the
    State in damages iOr the valve Or the prlV-
    ile$e so exercised.
    Yours vary truly
    APPROVBD:                    ATTCRNBY
    GENERALO;lFTEXAS
    ltiiiiy&                       By ‘~BtbY/’           ~
    Aeaiat
    otc : Jmo
    r/         Lip7
    Ron a. Noa,      III
    Aaeirtant'
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-405

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1947

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017