Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                               KEN PAXTON
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    May 11, 2015
    Mr. Kim C. Wyatt                                             Opinion No.      KP-0020
    President and Chairman, Board of Directors
    Trinity River Authority of Texas                            Re: Whether the Open Meetings Act prohibits a
    Post Office Box 60                                          governmental body from holding a meeting at
    Arlington, Texas 76004                                      a location that requires the presentation of
    photo identification (RQ-1232-GA)
    Dear Mr. Wyatt:
    You ask whether the Open Meetings Act prohibits a governmental body from holding open
    meetings at a location that requires the presentation of government-issued photo identification for
    admittance. 1 You explain that the Trinity River Authority ("the Authority") would like to hold
    regular meetings at its Central Regional Wastewater System Plant ("System Plant"). Request
    Letter at 1- 2. You further explain that "in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
    the Authority began requiring visitors to the [System] Plant to furnish security personnel with
    government-issued photo identification." 
    Id. at 1.
    The Open Meetings Act (the "Act") requires that "[e]very regular, special, or called
    meeting of a governmental body shall be open to the public," with limited exceptions articulated
    in the Act. TEX. Gov'T CODE ANN. § 551.002 (West 2012). The Act further defines "open" to
    mean "open to the public." 
    Id. § 551.001(5)
    (West Supp. 2014). No language in the Act, however,
    addresses whether an identification requirement at a meeting location would violate the statutory
    requirement of openness. 2
    1
    See Letter from Mr. Kim C. Wyatt, President & Chairman, Bd. of Dirs., Trinity River Auth., to Honorable
    Greg Abbott, Tex. Att'y Gen. at 1 (Nov. 20, 2014), https://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-
    opinion-rqs ("Request Letter").
    2 In contrast, other states' open meetings laws expressly prohibit governmental bodies from requiring
    identification in order to attend an open meeting. See, e.g., KY. REV. STAT. ANN. § 61.840 (West, Westlaw through
    2015 reg. sess.) ("No person may be required to identify himself in order to attend any" meeting ofa public agency.);
    MICH. COMP. LAWS ANN.§ 15.263(4) (West, Westlaw through 2015 reg. sess.) ("A person shall not be required as a
    condition of attendance at a meeting of a public body to register or otherwise provide his or her name or other
    Mr. Kim C. Wyatt - Page 2                          (KP-0020)
    Prior opinions from this office have construed the Act to mean that an open meeting must
    be "physically accessible to the public." Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. GA-1079 (2014) at 2, JC-0487
    (2002) at 2-3, JC-0053 (1999) at 5. Those opinions conclude that meetings held in New York
    City or Mexico would likely violate the Act due to the difficulty that members of the public would
    face in attempting to access the meeting locations. No Texas court cases or attorney general
    opinions directly address the legality of an identification requirement under the Act, although
    Opinion JC-0487 suggests that requiring identification for admittance to a meeting "could have a
    chilling effect on the public's willingness to attend." Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0487 (2002) at
    4 (quotation marks omitted).
    However, a number of facilities that are open to the public now require photo identification
    for security purposes. Most federal courthouses require visitors to produce photo identification
    before entry. 3 See United States v. Smith, 
    426 F.3d 567
    , 572-74 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that a
    photo identification requirement for access to a courthouse did not violate a defendant's right to a
    public trial). Adult passengers must provide identification at an airport in order to travel. 4 These
    identification requirements are likely intended as a security measure to provide protection to the
    general public and not to otherwise limit the public's access to these venues.
    A court addressing your question would likely weigh the need for the identification
    requirement as a security measure against the public's right of access guaranteed under the Act.
    Absent direct language from the Legislature prohibiting identification requirements, a court is
    unlikely to conclude as a matter of law that the Act prohibits a governmental body from holding
    open meetings at a location that requires the presentation of government-issued photo
    identification for admittance. Whether a specific meeting location is accessible to the public for
    purposes of the Act is ultimately a question of fact, however, and may depend upon, for example,
    the type of governmental body, the nature of the interested public, the available alternative meeting
    locations, and the specific procedures used in requiring photo identification. See Tex. Att' y Gen.
    Op. Nos. GA-1079 (2014) at 2, JC-0053 (1999) at 6. Such fact-intensive determinations are not
    appropriate for the opinion process of this office. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0756 (2010) at 4.
    information ...."); NEB. REV. STAT. ANN.§ 84-1412(3) (West, Westlaw through 2014 reg. sess.) ("No public body
    shall require members of the public to identify themselves as a condition for admission to the meeting .... ").
    3
    See, e.g. , U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT, Visitors Guide to the Historic John Minor Wisdom Court
    of Appeals Building at 1, http://www.lb5.uscourts.gov/Documents/VisitorsGuide.pdf.
    4
    U.S. DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TRANSP. SEC. ADMIN., Acceptable IDs, http://www.tsa.gov/traveler-
    information/acceptable-ids#main-content.
    Mr. Kim C. Wyatt - Page 3                   (KP-0020)
    SUMMARY
    A court is unlikely to conclude as a matter of law that the
    Open Meetings Act prohibits a governmental body from holding
    meetings at a location that requires the presentation of photo
    identification for admittance. Whether a specific meeting location
    is accessible to the public for purposes of the Act, however, is a
    question of fact and is not a determination appropriate for the
    attorney general opinion process.
    Very truly yours,
    IL~AJJ
    KEN PAXTON
    Attorney General of Texas
    CHARLES E. ROY
    First Assistant Attorney General
    BRANTLEY STARR
    Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
    VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Assistant Attorney General
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KP-0020

Judges: Ken Paxton

Filed Date: 7/2/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/10/2017