Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    GREG        ABBOTT
    August 8, 2014
    The Honorable Robert F. Deuell, M.D.                         Opinion No. GA-1074
    Chair, Committee on Economic Development
    Texas State Senate                                           Re: Whether Texas Triple Chance, a game
    Post Office Box 12068                                        proposed by the Lottery Commission, violates
    Austin, Texas 78711-2068                                     the Texas Constitution (RQ-1185-GA)
    Dear Senator Deuell:
    You ask whether a new game, Texas Triple Chance, created by the Texas Lottery
    Commission (the "Commission") violates the Texas Constitution. 1 Article III, subsection 47(e)
    of the Texas Constitution provides that "[t]he Legislature by general law may authorize the State
    to operate lotteries." TEX. CONST. art. III, § 47(e). Pursuant to this authority, the Legislature has
    enacted chapter 466 of the Government Code, titled the State Lottery Act ("the Act"). TEX.
    Gov'T CODE ANN. § 466.001 (West 2012); see generally 
    id. §§ 466.002-.453
    (West 2012 &
    Supp. 2013). Under section 466.015 ofthe Act, the Commission "may adopt rules governing the
    establishment and operation of the lottery, including rules governing ... the type of lottery
    games to be conducted." !d.§ 466.015(c)(1) (West 2012).
    Pursuant to its rulemaking authority, the Commission has adopted a new administrative
    rule explaining the game design, operation, and prize structure for Texas Triple Chance. See 16
    TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 401.322 (West 2014) (Tex. Lottery Comm'n). For each $2 play, "the
    player gets three sets of7 numbers, or three Chances to win." !d. § 401.322(d), (e)(2). Each set
    is selected from a field of 55 (numbered 1-55)." !d. § 401.322(d). Drawings for Texas Triple
    Chance will be held daily, Monday through Saturday, at which time "[t]en (10) different
    numbers from 1 through 55 shall be drawn." !d.§ 401.322(£)(1)-(2). "If the player matches all
    7 numbers in any one chance to the numbers drawn in the drawing, the player wins the top prize"
    of $100,000, subject to certain exceptions. 2 !d. § 401.322(d), (h)(l)(A). If a player matches 6
    numbers in any one chance to the numbers drawn in the drawing, the player wins $500, and
    'Letter from Senator Robert F. Deuel!, M.D., Chair, Comm. on Econ. Dev., to Honorable Greg Abbott,
    Tex. Att'y Gen. (Feb. 10, 2014), http://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opin ("Request Letter").
    2
    "[I]n any drawing where the number of top prize-winning Chances is greater than ten (I 0), the top prize
    shall be paid on a pari-mutuel rather than fixed prize basis and a liability cap of $1 million will be divided equally
    by the number of top prize-winning Chances." 16 TEX. ADMIN. CODE§ 401.322(h)(l)(A) (West 2014).
    The Honorable Robert F. Deuell, M.D. - Page 2               (GA-1074)
    smaller prizes exist for a match of 5, 4 or 3 numbers. ld. § 401.322(h)(l)(A) (table). In
    describing Texas Triple Chance, you state that the game "contains a preset prize amount" and
    that "[i]n the event there is not a jackpot winner, the Texas Lottery will retain the jackpot prize
    money." Request Letter at 1. Based on these aspects of the game, you question whether it
    "qualifies as a 'lottery' under the guidelines set by the Texas Constitution." 
    Id. In reviewing
    the constitutionality of an administrative rule, courts begin with the
    presumption that the rule is constitutional. See Tex. Liquor Control Bd. v. Attic Club, Inc., 
    457 S.W.2d 41
    , 45 (Tex. 1970) (explaining that statutes are presumed constitutional and that agency
    rules should be reviewed under the same principles as statutes). The Texas Constitution does not
    define the term "lottery," but the term is defined in the Act to mean "the procedures operated by
    the state under [chapter 466 of the Government Code] through which prizes are awarded or
    distributed by chance among persons who have paid, or unconditionally agreed to pay, for a
    chance or other opportunity to receive a prize." TEX. Gov'T CODE ANN. § 466.002(5) (West
    2012). This legislative definition of lottery is in accord with the Texas Supreme Court's
    articulation of the three elements necessary to constitute a lottery: "[1] the offering of a prize, [2]
    the award of the prize by chance, and [3] the giving of a consideration for an opportunity to win
    the prize." City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co., 
    100 S.W.2d 695
    , 701 (Tex. 1936). We will
    therefore analyze the Texas Triple Chance game in light of these elements. The Commission
    offers prizes for the game in the. amount of $100,000, $500, $25, $5 or $2, depending on the
    number of correct number matches in a given play. 16 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 401.322(h)(l)(A)
    (West 2014) (table). The award of the prize is contingent on matching a set of numbers to those
    drawn, which is decided by chance. 
    Id. Each play
    requires $2 in consideration for an
    opportunity to win a prize. 
    Id. § 401.322(e)(2).
    The Texas Triple Chance game therefore
    satisfies the three elements required to qualify as a lottery under Texas law.
    The Commission is charged with administering the provisions of the State Lottery Act.
    TEX. Gov'T CODE ANN. § 466.015(a) (West 2012). The Legislature has given the Commission
    broad discretion to adopt rules governing the establishment and operation of the lottery so long
    as such rules do not conflict with state or federal law. 
    Id. § 466.015(c).
    With regard to your
    stated concerns about the game, we find nothing in the Texas Constitution or the Act that
    prohibits the Commission from offering a preset prize amount regardless of the number of tickets
    purchased. Nor does the Texas Constitution or the Act require the Commission to carry forward
    any unpaid prize money to be awarded to an ev(mtual winner. 3 If room for policy determinations
    exists in a statute, courts normally defer to the agency's interpretation unless it is plainly
    erroneous or inconsistent with the statute, regulation, or rule. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Co. v.
    Combs, 
    340 S.W.3d 432
    , 438 (Tex. 2011). The lack oflegislative directive on how lottery prizes
    are to be awarded suggests that the Legislature has given the Commission discretion to make
    3
    Multiple games currently offered through the Commission also involve preset prize amounts with the
    possibility of no jackpot winner. See, e.g., 
    id. §§ 401.307
    ('"Pick 3' On-Line Game Rule"), .316 ("'Daily 4' On-
    Line Game Rule"), .320 ('"All or Nothing' On-Line Game Rule").
    The Honorable Robert F. Deuell, M.D. - Page 3 (GA-1074)
    those policy determinations. Thus, a court is unlikely to conclude that the Commission's Texas
    Triple Chance game is unconstitutional merely because it awards a preset prize amount
    regardless of the number of tickets purchased or because it does not carry forward any unpaid
    prize money to be awarded to an eventual winner.
    The Honorable Robert F. Deuell, M.D. - Page 4      (GA-1074)
    SUMMARY
    A court is unlikely to conclude that the Texas Lottery
    Commission's Texas Triple Chance game is unconstitutional
    merely because it awards a preset prize amount regardless of the
    number of tickets purchased or because it does not carry forward
    any unpaid prize money to be awarded to an eventual winner.
    Very truly yours,
    Attorney General ofTexas
    DANIEL T. HODGE
    First Assistant Attorney General
    JAMES D. BLACKLOCK
    Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
    VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Virginia K. Hoelscher
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: GA-1074

Judges: Greg Abbott

Filed Date: 7/2/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017