Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                              ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    GREG        ABBOTT
    December 10, 2010
    Mr. Rod Bordelon                                         Opinion No. GA-0828
    Commissioner of Workers' Compensation
    Texas Department of Insurance                            Re: Whether a workers' compensation carrier
    7551 Metro Center Drive, Suite 100                       may pay for a prescription drug at a rate lower
    Austin, Texas 78744-1609                                 than the fee rate allowed under the guidelines of
    the Division of Workers' Compensation of the
    Department of Insurance (RQ-0890-GA)
    Dear Commissioner Bordelon:
    You ask two questions about the fee rates that workers' compensation insurance carriers must
    pay to reimburse health care providers for prescription drugs and other remedies delivered to injured
    workers under Texas workers' compensation laws.' First, you ask whether insurers may contract
    with providers after January 1, 2011, to pay for prescriptions at rates lower than the rates that might
    be allowed under the fee guidelines established by the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of
    Workers' Compensation (the "Division"). Request Letter at I. If the answer to that question is
    "yes," you want to know whether insurers may contract with informal or voluntary networks to
    obtain such contracts. 
    Id. I. Whether
    Insurers May Pay Rates Lower than the Guidelines Allow
    In presenting your first question, you discuss whether sections 408.027 ,408.028, and413.0 11
    of the Labor Code prohibit insurers from contracting for a reimbursement rate that is lower than the
    rates that the guidelines allow. 
    Id. at 1-3.
    We begin our answer by noting that none of those statutes
    refers to a minimum fee rate at which insurers may reimburse providers for prescriptions. See
    generally TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. §§ 408.027 (West Supp. 2010), 408.028 (West 2006), 413.011
    (West Supp. 2010). This suggests that the statutes you discuss do not establish a minimum rate. See
    State v. Shumake, 199 S.W.3d 279,284 (Tex. 2006) (holding that courts determine the Legislature's
    intent from the plain meaning of the words it chose); see also Cameron v. Terrel & Garrett, Inc., 
    618 S.W.2d 535
    , 540 (Tex. 1981) (holding that courts must presume that every word excluded from a
    statute was excluded for a purpose). The lack of a reference to a minimum rate contrasts with the
    express grant of permission in section 413.011 to insurers to contract "for fees that exceed the fees
    adopted by the division under this section." TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 413.011(d-4) (West Supp.
    lRequest Letter at 1 (available at http://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov).
    Mr. Rod Bordelon - Page 2                             (GA-0828)
    20 I 0) (effective January I, 20 II). This is further indication that the statutes you discuss do not
    establish a minimum rate. See Mid-Century Ins. Co. o/Tex. v. Kidd, 
    997 S.W.2d 265
    , 273-74 (Tex.
    1999) (explaining that a law's express inclusion of a thing generally excludes a thing not expressly
    included). We have not found any statute that mentions a minimum rate for prescriptions under the
    Texas workers' compensation system, nor did any of the many briefs we received in this matter
    purport to identify such a law. Because we are unaware of a statute that identifies a minimum
    allowable rate, we must interpret the guidelines in order to determine whether there is a minimum
    allowable rate.
    The guidelines refer to a maximum allowable rate, but they do not refer to a minimum
    allowable rate. 28 TEx. ADMIN. CODE § 134.503(a) (2010) (Tex. Dep't ofIns., Reimbursement
    Methodology).2 This suggests that the guidelines do not provide a minimum allowable rate. See
    Kidd, 997 S. W .2d at 273-74 (noting thatthe express inclusion of something excludes something not
    expressly included); see also Rodriguez v. Servo Lloyd's Ins. Co., 
    997 S.W.2d 248
    , 254 (Tex. 1999)
    (providing that courts interpret administrative rules as they interpret statutes). Therefore, we
    conclude that there is not a minimum allowable rate under the guidelines.
    II.      Whether Insnrers May Contract for Discounted Rates
    You also ask "whether insurance carriers may contract with informal or voluntary networks"
    to obtain a' contractual agreement with health care providers to pay for prescriptions at rates lower
    than the rates allowed under the guidelines after January 1,2011. Request Letter at 1. Because there
    could not be a rate lower than the rates the guidelines allow, we will discuss the more basic question
    of whether insurance carriers may enter into contracts with informal or voluntary networks to obtain
    contracts with health care providers to pay for prescriptions at negotiated rates. Under Insurance
    Code chapter 1305, every informal or voluntary network must be certified as a workers'
    compensation health care network ("WCHCN") by January I, 2011. TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. §
    413.0115(b) (West Supp. 2010). Chapter 1305 provides that "prescription medication or services,
    as defined by section 401.0 II (19)(E), Labor Code, may not be delivered through" a WCHCN. TEx.
    INS. CODE ANN. § 1305.101(c) (West 2009). Section 40 1.0 11 (19)(E) ofthe Labor Code provides
    that a "prescription drug, medicine, or other remedy" is a form of "[hJealth care," the definition of
    which includes "all reasonable and necessary medical aid, medical examinations, medical treatments,
    medical diagnoses, medical evaluation, and medical services." TEx. LAB. CODE ANN. §
    413.011(19)(E) (West Supp. 2010). Thus, "prescription medication or services" under chapter
    1305.101 are medications or services that provide medical aid to injured workers.
    Neither the Labor Code nor Insurance Code defines the adjective "medical," but both codes
    use it to define other terms in a way that indicates it describes a physical treatment or condition. See
    
    id. § 401.011(31)
    (defming the term "medical benefit" as payment for health care intended to treat
    an injury or disease); TEx.lNs. CODE ANN. § 1305.004(13) (West Supp. 2010) (defining the term
    "medical emergency" as the sudden onset of a condition manifested by severe pain or serious bodily
    2See E-mail from Dirk Johnson, the Division's General Counsel, to Jason Boatright, Assistant Attorney General
    (Sept. 16,2010) (indicating that the guidelines are section 134.503) (on file with the Opinion Committee).
    Mr. Rod Bordelon - Page 3                             (GA-0828)
    dysfunction). Because entering into a contract would not physically treat an injured worker, entering
    into a contract could not be a prescription medication or service. See TEx. INs. CODE ANN. §
    1305.101(c) (West 2009) (prohibiting a WCHCN from providing a prescription medication or
    service). Therefore, although a WCHCN must not provide prescription medication or services, an
    insurance carrier may enter into a contract with a WCHCN to obtain a contract with a health care
    provider to pay for prescriptions at a negotiated rate after January I, 2011. 3
    3We express no opinion on whether any particular contract between a WCHCN and an insurer would be legally
    pennissible. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0302 (2005) (stating that this office does not review or construe contracts).
    Mr. Rod Bordelon - Page 4                    (GA-0828)
    ,
    SUMMARY
    Sections 408.027, 408.028, and 413.011 of the Texas Labor
    Code do not establish a minimum allowable rate at which workers'
    compensation insurance carriers may pay for a prescription drug,
    medicine, or other remedy. A workers' compensation insurance
    carrier may contract with a workers' compensation health care
    network to obtain a contract with a health care provider to pay for a
    prescription drug, medicine, or other remedy at negotiated rates that
    are permitted by law.
    DANIEL T. HODGE
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DAVID 1,. SCHENCK
    Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
    NANCY S. FULLER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Jason Boatright
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: GA-0828

Judges: Greg Abbott

Filed Date: 7/2/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017