Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1991 )


Menu:
  •                             QMficeof the Bttornep Q3eneral
    Otate of Qexag
    DAN MORAL=
    ATmwEy
    GENERAL                             May 17,199l
    Honorable Erwin W. Barton              Opinion No.     DM-SA (Clarification)
    chairman
    Human Services Committee               Re: Whether section 102.51 of the Alcoholic
    Texas House of Representatives         Beverage Code imposes a territorial limita-
    P.O. Box 2910                          tion on the resale of beer by local distri-
    Austin, Texas 78769-2910               butors (RQ-2151)
    Dear Representative Barton:
    You ask about the territory in which a local beer distributor may resell beer.
    Your question requires an interpretation of both section 102.51 and section 102.52
    of the Alcoholic Beverage Code. Section 102.51 provides in part:
    (a) Each holder of a marmfacturer’s or nonresident
    mamrfacturer’s license shall designate territorial limits in this
    state within which the brands of beer the licensee mamrfactures
    may be sold by general, local, or branch distributor’s licensees.
    (b) Each holder of a general, local, or branch distributor’s
    license shall enter into a written agreement with each
    manufacturer from which the distributor purchases beer for
    distribution and sale in this state setting forth the sales territory
    within which each brand of beer purchased by that distributor
    may be distributed and sold. No holder of a general, local, or
    branch distributor’s license shag make any sales of any brand of
    beer outside the sales territory specified in the written
    agreement.
    Section 102.52 provides as follows:
    (a) Nothing in Section 10251 of this code limits or alters the
    right of a holder of a general, local, or branch distributor’s
    p.   21A
    Honorable Erwin W. Barton - Page 2        (DM-5A)
    license to sell beer to any other holder of a general, local, or
    branch distributor’s license, except that a distributor who has
    purchased beer from another distributor may distribute and sell
    the beer only within a territory for which the mamtfacturer of
    the brand has designated that it may be sold by a distributor.
    (b) A holder of a general, local, or branch distributor’s
    license may not purchase, possess, transport, or sell any brand of
    beer outside of the county in which the distributor’s licensed
    premises are located unless the distributor has a written
    assigned territory from the holder of a manufacturer’s or
    nonresident manufacturer’s license covering that brand of beer.
    You interpret sections 102.51 and 102.52 to mean that local distributors are
    required to limit beer distribution to the territories in which general distributors
    may resell beer. See genenrlly Alto. Bev. Code 5%64.01. 66.01 (holder of general
    distributor’s license or branch distriiutor’s license may sell beer to and receive beer
    from general, local, or branch distributors). You also inform us that some local
    distributors have taken the position that those provisions permit them to resell a
    particular brand in any part of the state in which the manufacturer permits the sale
    of that brand. Neither of these interpretations is entirely correct. The correct
    interpretation depends on whether the local distributor purchased beer directly
    from a manufacturer or from a general distributor. When the local distributor
    purchases beer directly from the manufacturer, the statutes make clear that the
    distributor may distribute a particular brand of beer only in the territory assigned to
    the local distriiutor by the manufacturer. When a local distributor purchases beer
    from another distributor, sections 102.51 and 102.52 limit the territory where the
    local distributor may resell the beer to the territory assigned to the general
    distributor by the manutkturer from whom the general distrib.utor originally
    purchased the beer.
    In response to your suggestion that a local distributor may resell a brand of
    beer purchased from a general distriiutor in the territory assigned to the general
    distributor, we note that subsection (b) of section 102.51 states that a holder of a
    local distributor’s license may not “make any sales of any brand of beer outside the
    sales territory specified in the written agreement.” Nothing in that language
    suggests that the territorial limitation applies only to beer a general distributor
    purchases directly from a manufacturer. Further, subsection (b) of section 102.52
    p. 22A
    Honorable Erwin W. Barton - Page 3         (DM-5A)
    states that a holder of a local distributor’s license may not sell any brand of beer
    outside the county of the distributor’s licensed premises “unless the distributor has a
    written assigned territory from the holder of a manufacturer’s or nonresident
    mamtfacturer’s license covering that brand of beer.” Those provisions clearly
    disallow the possibility that a local distributor can expand his assigned territory or a
    territory assigned to a general distributor by purchasing beer from the general
    distributor rather than from the manufacturer.
    Those provisions negate the local distributors’ suggestion that a local
    distributor who purchases a brand of beer from a general distributor, rather than a
    manufacturer, may sell that beer in any territoty in which that brand may be sold by
    my distributor. Subsection (a) of section 102.52 does contain a clause stating that “a
    distriiutor who has purchased beer from another distributor may distribute and sell
    the beer only within a territory for which the manufacturer of the brand has
    designated that it may be sold by a distributor.” Standing alone, that language might
    support the local distributors’ suggestion. That interpretation is, however, in direct
    conflict with subsection (b) of section 102.51 and subsection (b) of section 102.52,
    both of which limit a local distributor’s authority to sell beer to the territory assigned
    to the general distributor by the manufacturer when the local distributor purchases
    from the general distributor. Since subsection (b) of section 102.51 and subsection
    (b) of section 10252 were both enacted later than subsection (a) of section 102.52,
    those provisions prevail. Taas State Board of Pharmacy v. K&man, 
    550 S.W.2d 104
    (Tex. Civ. App.--Tyler 1977, no writ) (when statutes conflict, later-enacted prevails);
    see Acts 1983,6&h Leg., ch. 959, 0 1, at 5229 (amending subsection (b) of section
    102.51); Acts 1979, 66th Leg., ch. 33, $ 9, at 55 (adding subsection (b) to section
    102.52); Acts 1975.64th Leg., ch. 20,s 1, at 41 (adding substance and basic language
    of section 102.52(a)). In conclusion, a local distributor who purchases beer from a
    general distributor may sell a brand of beer only in the territoty assigned to the
    general distributor by the manufacturer of that brand.
    SUMMARY
    A local beer distributor may resell a particular brand of
    beer that he purchases from a general distributor only in the
    territory in which the general distributor is authorized by the
    mamtfacturer to sell that brand. When a local distributor
    purchases beer from a manufacturer, the local distributor may
    p. 23A
    Honorable Erwin W. Barton - Page 4        (DM-SA)
    only resell the beer in the territory specified in his written
    agreement with the manufacturer.
    DAN MORALES
    Attorney General of Texas
    WlLL PRYOR
    First Assistant Attorney General
    MARY KELLER
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    RENEAHICKS
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    MADEJXINE B. JOHNSON
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Sarah Woelk
    Assistant Attorney General
    p.   24~
    

Document Info

Docket Number: DM-5a

Judges: Dan Morales

Filed Date: 7/2/1991

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017